Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
1000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-02-01
2035-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Sarcopenia and Systemic Therapy in HCC
NCT06805552
Ultrasound Assessment of Sarcopenia in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease: the SARCOLIVER Study
NCT06101758
Building of Prognosis Model for Patients With Cirrhosis Based on Sarcopenia Assessed by Deep Learning
NCT06531200
A Cross Sectional Study for Determining Prevalence of Sarcopenia and Myosteatosis in Cirrhotic Patients and to Study the Association Between Imaging and Clinical Parameters
NCT05157308
Protocol for Muscle Attenuation Cut-offs in Cirrhosis
NCT06593015
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Despite the high prevalence of sarcopenia among the aging and diseased populations, its diagnosis remains challenging as generally accepted international standards are lacking. Combined with the low agreement of available diagnosis criteria, this further complicates diagnostic methods. (8) To date, the diagnosis of sarcopenia relies on the quantification of muscle mass and a clinical assessment of muscle strength. For the estimation of muscle mass, costly computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the methods of choice to quantify the muscled area of a cross section on the level of the L3 vertebra- these methods also require skilled personnel and specialized software solutions for image evaluation. Methods used to assess muscle function, such as hand grip strength, gait speed and knee flexion/extension also require skilled personnel and present an additional layer of complexity to the overall diagnosis as they are difficult to standardize and heavily dependent patient compliance. Furthermore, the interpretation of the outlined diagnostic measures remains ambiguous, since different consensus definitions show conflicting results in different patient populations. Biomarker of muscle function and inflammation, as well as hormone assessments have been considered as useful diagnostic alternatives, however they are not part of clinical routine yet. Taken together, current diagnostic options for sarcopenia remain grossly insufficient which, often, allows this detrimental condition to be missed in clinical practice thereby hindering adequate and timely intervention.
In addition, currently there is no medical treatment available for sarcopenia. The current recommendation therefore is to improve nutrition, especially regarding the protein content, and physical activity.
Acquiring large enough datasets is of utmost importance to validate diagnostic tools or develop novel biomarker and therapies.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sarcopenia
Diagnosed with sarcopenia according to EWGSOP (European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People)
No interventions assigned to this group
no sarcopenia
Not fulfilling sarcopenia criteria according to EWGSOP
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Informed consent
* CT/MRI scan as part of routine care within +/-2 month of the study visit
Exclusion Criteria
* Hepatocellular carcinoma stage BCLC C or D
* Any other condition or circumstance, which, in the opinion of the investigator, would affect the patient's ability to participate in the protocol
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medical University of Graz
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Medical University of Graz
Graz, , Austria
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Lavra Celcer, MSc
Role: CONTACT
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Lavra Celcer, MSc
Role: backup
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
34-294 ex 21/22
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.