Effectiveness and Safety of Two Vitamin D3 Supplementation Regimens in Adults with Early-stage COVID-19
NCT ID: NCT06585995
Last Updated: 2024-09-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
216 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-04-29
2024-05-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study hypothesized that an accelerated vitamin D3 supplementation regimen in adult patients with COVID-19 would achieve the ideal serum calcidiol level (40-60 ng/ml) during the active phase of the disease. This was a randomized controlled clinical trial with two parallel groups. The first group, the accelerated supplementation group, received a single monthly dose of vitamin D3, while the second group, the daily supplementation group, received a daily dose of vitamin D3 during their hospital stay. A total of 216 patients were included in the study and were randomly assigned to one of the two groups.
Key procedures and measurements included the collection of three blood samples from each patient during their hospital stay-at admission (day 1), on day 7, and on day 14. Biomarker analysis measured serum levels of vitamin D3, Von Willebrand Factor, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and glutathione peroxidase. Clinical monitoring was conducted to track the development of critical COVID-19, the need for mechanical ventilation, and overall clinical outcomes, such as recovery or death.
The importance of this study lay in the role of vitamin D3 in immune regulation, as it had been identified as a protective factor against severe respiratory infections. By determining the optimal supplementation strategy, this study hoped to improve clinical outcomes for COVID-19 patients, reduce mortality rates, and prevent the progression to critical illness.
Inclusion criteria for the study were adult patients aged 18-65 years with early-stage severe COVID-19, who had signed informed consent and had no contraindications for vitamin D3 supplementation. Exclusion criteria included patients with other severe comorbidities, those who were pregnant, those requiring immediate intensive care, and patients with a history of conditions that affect vitamin D metabolism.
Safety and efficacy monitoring tracked the vitamin D3 levels and correlated them with inflammation markers, oxidative stress, and thrombotic status to evaluate the impact of supplementation. Clinical progression was also monitored to assess the safety and efficacy of the vitamin D3 regimens.
Outcome measures included changes in serum calcidiol levels, correlation of calcidiol levels with biomarkers (IL-6, glutathione peroxidase, Von Willebrand Factor), duration and intensity of COVID-19 symptoms, incidence of critical COVID-19, need for mechanical ventilation, and overall clinical outcomes (recovery or death). This study aimed to provide valuable insights into the role of vitamin D3 in managing severe COVID-19, potentially informing treatment guidelines and improving patient outcomes.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of Vitamin D Supplementation to Prevent the Risk of Acquiring COVID-19 in Healthcare Workers
NCT04535791
Vitamine D3 Supplementation in Patients With Serum Values +/- 20ng/ml
NCT04810949
Vitamin D and COVID-19 Management
NCT04385940
Oral 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and COVID-19
NCT04386850
A Single Wintertime Dose of Vitamin D3 to Prevent Winter Decline in Vitamin D Status in Healthy Adults
NCT01924910
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study included 216 adult patients who were diagnosed with early-stage severe COVID-19. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The first group, the accelerated supplementation group, received a single monthly dose of vitamin D3, while the second group, the daily supplementation group, received a daily dose of vitamin D3 during their hospital stay.
Each patient had three blood samples taken during their hospital stay to monitor the effects of vitamin D3 supplementation. The blood samples were collected at admission (day 1), on day 7, and on day 14. Each sample consisted of 7 ml of blood, with 2.5 ml used for serum analysis and 4.5 ml for plasma analysis. Biomarker measurements included serum levels of vitamin D3, Von Willebrand Factor, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and glutathione peroxidase. These biomarkers were measured using ELISA kits and analyzed via spectrophotometry. The vitamin D3 levels were quantified using the Vitros 5600 analyzer. The initial vitamin D3 measurement guided the calculation of the required dose for each patient.
Patients were closely monitored for the development of critical COVID-19, defined by severe respiratory distress requiring intensive care. Clinical monitoring included tracking the need for mechanical ventilation, defined by parameters such as PaO2 \<60 mmHg, SpO2 \<88%, and PaCO2 \>50 mmHg with pH \<7.32. The overall clinical outcomes, including recovery or death, were recorded. Any adverse events related to vitamin D3 supplementation were documented.
Clinical and laboratory data were collected systematically. Clinical data were gathered through collaboration with treating physicians and included detailed records of patient progression. Laboratory data were obtained from the hospital's pathology laboratory and stored securely. The blood samples were processed and stored in a biosecure environment, with serum and plasma components separated and stored in an ultracold freezer at -70°C until analysis.
Inclusion criteria for the study were adult patients aged 18-65 years with early-stage severe COVID-19, who had signed informed consent, and had no contraindications for vitamin D3 supplementation. Exclusion criteria included patients with severe comorbidities, such as terminal cancer or decompensated diabetes, pregnant or lactating women, patients requiring immediate intensive care, and patients with a history of conditions affecting vitamin D metabolism. Other exclusion criteria were recent use of high-dose vitamin D3 supplements, known intolerance to vitamin D3, and several other medical conditions that could interfere with the study.
Safety and efficacy were assessed by tracking serum vitamin D3 levels and correlating them with key biomarkers: inflammation (measured by IL-6 levels), oxidative stress (measured by glutathione peroxidase activity), and thrombotic status (measured by Von Willebrand Factor levels). Clinical outcomes and any adverse events were recorded throughout the study to determine whether vitamin D3 supplementation could positively influence these biomarkers and clinical outcomes.
The collected data were analyzed using a variety of statistical methods to ensure robustness. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data, including measures of central tendency (means, medians) and dispersion (standard deviations, ranges). The distribution of continuous variables was analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov or Shapiro Wilks tests to assess the normality of the data. Pearson or Spearman correlation tests were used to evaluate the relationships between vitamin D3 levels and other biomarkers. Chi-square tests and T-tests or Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare proportions and means between the two groups. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models to assess the impact of biomarkers on patient survival. All statistical analyses were conducted with a significance level of p \< 0.05, using PRISM v9.0 software.
Primary outcome measures included changes in serum calcidiol levels, correlations with biomarkers (IL-6, glutathione peroxidase, Von Willebrand Factor), and the duration and intensity of COVID-19 symptoms. Secondary outcome measures included the incidence of critical COVID-19, the need for mechanical ventilation, and overall clinical outcomes (recovery or death).
The study aimed to provide valuable insights into the role of vitamin D3 in managing severe COVID-19. By comparing two supplementation regimens, the study sought to identify the most effective strategy for achieving optimal vitamin D3 levels and improving patient outcomes. The findings could inform treatment guidelines and contribute to better clinical management of COVID-19, potentially reducing mortality rates and preventing the progression to critical illness.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Daily Vitamin D Supplementation Group
This arm of the study involves daily administration of vitamin D to participants, with the dosage adjusted based on body weight and initial vitamin D levels, aiming to to investigate the efficacy of this regimen in improving vitamin D levels and reducing COVID-19 symptoms and IL-6, GPx and Von Willebrand Factor concentration.
vitamin D (cholecalciferol) supplementation
This pilot clinical study administered and compared daily and bolus vitamin D dosing regimens to achieve and maintain optimal serum 25(OH)D levels in patients with COVID-19. The daily dose group received constant cholecalciferol supplementation (vitamin D supplementation), aimed at achieving more stable and non-peak 25(OH)D levels. In contrast, the bolus group received a one-month cumulative monthly dose, divided into 4 doses, administered on 4 consecutive days, which could result in rapid increases followed by gradual decreases in 25(OH)D levels. The daily dose of cholecalciferol was calculated using the following formula: Daily dose of cholecalciferol = \[Weight (kg) × desired increase in 25(OH)D (ng/ml) × 2.5\] - 10 .
Bolus dose = (daily dose)(30 days)/4 doses
Monthly Bolus Vitamin D Supplementation Group
This arm of the study consists of administering a monthly bolus dose of vitamin D, equivalent to the total daily dose accumulated over the month, divided into 4 daily doses on 4 consecutive days, to investigate the efficacy of this regimen in improving vitamin D levels and reducing COVID-19 symptoms and IL-6, GPx and Von Willebrand Factor concentration.
vitamin D (cholecalciferol) supplementation
This pilot clinical study administered and compared daily and bolus vitamin D dosing regimens to achieve and maintain optimal serum 25(OH)D levels in patients with COVID-19. The daily dose group received constant cholecalciferol supplementation (vitamin D supplementation), aimed at achieving more stable and non-peak 25(OH)D levels. In contrast, the bolus group received a one-month cumulative monthly dose, divided into 4 doses, administered on 4 consecutive days, which could result in rapid increases followed by gradual decreases in 25(OH)D levels. The daily dose of cholecalciferol was calculated using the following formula: Daily dose of cholecalciferol = \[Weight (kg) × desired increase in 25(OH)D (ng/ml) × 2.5\] - 10 .
Bolus dose = (daily dose)(30 days)/4 doses
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
vitamin D (cholecalciferol) supplementation
This pilot clinical study administered and compared daily and bolus vitamin D dosing regimens to achieve and maintain optimal serum 25(OH)D levels in patients with COVID-19. The daily dose group received constant cholecalciferol supplementation (vitamin D supplementation), aimed at achieving more stable and non-peak 25(OH)D levels. In contrast, the bolus group received a one-month cumulative monthly dose, divided into 4 doses, administered on 4 consecutive days, which could result in rapid increases followed by gradual decreases in 25(OH)D levels. The daily dose of cholecalciferol was calculated using the following formula: Daily dose of cholecalciferol = \[Weight (kg) × desired increase in 25(OH)D (ng/ml) × 2.5\] - 10 .
Bolus dose = (daily dose)(30 days)/4 doses
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients older than 18 years and younger than 65 years who have received at least 2 doses of the COVID-19 vaccine.
3. Patients who agree to participate at the time of hospitalization and sign the informed consent.
4. Patients with 25(OH)D levels below 40 ng/ml and without contraindications for Vitamin D3 supplementation.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Pregnant or breastfeeding patients.
3. Patients who have received Vitamin D3 supplements greater than 800 IU/day, 15 days before recruitment.
4. Patients with contraindications for Vitamin D3 supplementation, such as active granulomatous diseases (sarcoidosis, tuberculosis, lymphoma, Vitamin D3 metabolism disorders, hypercalcemia).
5. History of kidney stones.
6. Known Vitamin D3 hypervitaminosis or hypercalcemia.
7. Known intolerance to Vitamin D3.
8. Patients with extrapulmonary organ failure.
9. Patients with 25(OH)D levels equal to or greater than 40 ng/ml.
10. Patients who, at the time of recruitment, exhibit clear signs of "critical illness" due to COVID-19, such as organ failure requiring intensive care admission or who meet the criteria for mechanical ventilation due to oxygen desaturation: PaO2 \<60 mmHg (after supplemental oxygen), SpO2 \<88% (after supplemental oxygen), PaCO2 \>50 mmHg with pH \<7.32.
Elimination Criteria:
1. Patients who require major surgery after recruitment.
2. Patients who develop contraindications to standard COVID-19 treatment.
3. Patients who die before completing the three blood sample collections.
4. Patients who receive an IL-6 blocking drug.
5. Patients who develop clinical conditions that prevent blood sample collection or for whom medical recommendations advise against blood sample collection.
6. Patients who withdraw their consent to continue participating in the study.
7. Patients who develop adverse reactions secondary to Vitamin D3 administration, requiring the suspension of Vitamin D3, such as severe hypercalcemia.
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Escuela Militar de Graduados de Sanidad, SEDENA
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
IVÁN IGNACIO MEJÍA
Principal investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Instituto Nacional de Pediatría
Mexico City, , Mexico
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
No. 2022/C-015
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
No. 2022/C-015
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.