Efficacy of Vitamin D Treatment in Mortality Reduction Due to COVID-19.

NCT ID: NCT04621058

Last Updated: 2022-07-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

108 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-11-09

Study Completion Date

2021-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

HYPOTHESIS: The administration of vitamin D supplements to patients who have a positive diagnosis for SARS-Cov-2, acute pneumonia requiring hospital admission and vitamin D deficiency have a more favourable evolution than subjects not treated with vitamin D (placebo). This favourable evolution will translate into a reduction in mortality, fewer ICU admissions and fewer days of stay in hospital.

OBJECTIVES:

PRINCIPAL: To assess whether the group of patients receiving vitamin D supplements have a less severe evolution of their acute pneumonia, translated into lower mortality, than patients who do not receive that supplement.

SECONDARY: 1) To determine the number of intensive care admissions and the number of days of admission in both groups (control group and intervention group). 2) To estimate the prevalence of Vitamin D deficiency in the patients studied and the effectiveness of its supplementation. 3) To establish the degree of complexity of each study group and carry out a cost-effectiveness study.

METHODOLOGY: DESIGN: Clinical trial, randomized, placebo-controlled and double-blind, with two parallel groups The active treatment will be vitamin D (Hydroferol soft capsules of 0.266 mg). The placebo will consist of a tablet with the same external characteristics and with the same treatment scheme but which will not contain any vitamin D active ingredients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

HYPOTHESIS: The administration of vitamin D supplements to patients who have a positive diagnosis for SARS-Cov-2, acute pneumonia requiring hospital admission and vitamin D deficiency have a more favourable evolution than subjects not treated with vitamin D (placebo). This favourable evolution will translate into a reduction in mortality, fewer ICU admissions and fewer days of stay in hospital.

OBJECTIVES:

PRINCIPAL: To assess whether the group of patients receiving vitamin D supplements have a less severe evolution of their acute pneumonia, translated into lower mortality, than patients who do not receive that supplement.

SECONDARY: 1) To determine the number of intensive care admissions and the number of days of admission in both groups (control group and intervention group). 2) To estimate the prevalence of Vitamin D deficiency in the patients studied and the effectiveness of its supplementation. 3) To establish the degree of complexity of each study group and carry out a cost-effectiveness study.

METHODOLOGY: DESIGN: Clinical trial, randomized, placebo-controlled and double-blind, with two parallel groups The active treatment will be vitamin D (Hydroferol soft capsules of 0.266 mg). The placebo will consist of a tablet with the same external characteristics and with the same treatment scheme but which will not contain any vitamin D active ingredients.

Inclusion criteria: Adult patients admitted to the Respiratory/Internal Medicine Unit of Santiago hospital of the OSI Araba HUA for acute pneumonia and suffering from a vitamin D deficit (\< 30 ng/ml) and a RT-PCR, in nasopharyngeal exudate, positive for SARS-CoV-2.

Exclusion criteria: 1)Patients taking any type of vitamin D supplement. 2)Patients with hypoparathyroidism. 3) Patients in whom the administration of vitamin D is formally contraindicated. 4) Patients who cannot take vitamin D orally.

OUR SIZE: In order to answer to the main objective (mortality reduction 21% versus 50% intervention and control group respectively), we will need a total sample of 108 evaluable subjects-54 patients per group (J Crit Care. 2018;44:300-5).Statistical power 90%,95% statistical significance with possible loss of follow-up of 5% of patients.

A recruitment period of about 12 months is needed.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: In order to answer to the main and secondary objectives (mortality and ICU admission), the Chi-square test will be performed and in the event that any of the frequencies is less than 5, the exact Fisher test will be used.

Depending on the distribution of the quantitative variables, the Student t-test for independent samples or the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test will be used, respectively.

The analysis criterion will be "by intention to treat". In all cases. The statistical significance will be 95%.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

SAR SARS Pneumonia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized controlled clinical trial.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
Triple-blind study, neither the patients, nor the researchers, nor those responsible for the statistical analysis will know the treatment that the patient is undergoing.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

D VITAMIN GROUP

The administration of vitamin D will be carried out using the following treatment scheme:

If vitamin D deficiency (\< 30 ng/ml) treatment with 2 capsules of 0.266 mg If vitamin D deficiency (\< 40 ng/ml): treatment with 1 capsule of 0.266 mg

Blood levels of vitamin D will be determined on day 1, 4, 7 and 14. Based on the results from day 14, a new determination is recommended 4 weeks after starting treatment with the primary care physician who will decide whether to continue or interrupt the treatment. This phase will be carried out outside of the study.

In addition, the product should only be administered, if blood calcium and phosphorus levels are within normal limits, as well as if the creatinuria/calciuria ratio is within normal ranges.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Vitamin D

Intervention Type DRUG

In case of Vitamin D levels \<30 or 40ng/ml patients will take vitamin D supplements.

PLACEBO GROUP

The procedure will be the same as in the experimental group but instead of the active component, patients will take placebo capsules exactly the same as above but without the active component.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

PLACEBO

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo capsules exactly the same as the above, but without the active component.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Vitamin D

In case of Vitamin D levels \<30 or 40ng/ml patients will take vitamin D supplements.

Intervention Type DRUG

PLACEBO

Placebo capsules exactly the same as the above, but without the active component.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

D VITAMIN GROUP PLACEO GROUP

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Admitted to the Respiratory or Internal medicine Units of Santiago hospital (HUA) due to pneumonia.
* Vitamin D deficiency (25(OH) defined by blood levels below 30 mg/ml.
* Possibility for observation during the treatment period.
* Signing of written consent (oral informed consent exceptionally).
* Positive PCR for diagnosis of sars-cov2 infection

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients taking any type of vitamin D supplement.
* Patients with hypoparathyroidism.
* Pregnant or lactating women.
* Patients in whom the administration of vitamin D is formally contraindicated (see annex VI).
* Patients who at time of inclusion, cannot take vitamin D orally.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fundación Eduardo Anitua

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Bioaraba Health Research Institute

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Joaquín Durán Cantolla

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Bioaraba Health Research Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Joaquín Durán Cantolla

Vitoria-Gasteiz, Alava, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

VITD

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Vitamin D and COVID-19 Management
NCT04385940 COMPLETED PHASE3
Oral 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and COVID-19
NCT04386850 UNKNOWN PHASE2/PHASE3
Tele-health Enabled Clinical Trial for COVID-19
NCT04489628 WITHDRAWN PHASE1/PHASE2