Evaluation of a Collaborative Mental Health Care System
NCT ID: NCT06581874
Last Updated: 2025-11-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
478 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-03-03
2026-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This is the context in which the 'med@psy' system was set up in the Toulon-Provence-Mediterranean metropolitan area by a private psychiatrist. It facilitates access to psychiatric second referral for General Practitioners (GPs) by pooling the 48-hour supply of psychiatric consultations in real time. It is assumed that this system will facilitate access to outpatient psychiatric care and help to optimize the organisation of patient care and follow-up. The aim of this study is to evaluate the med@psy system in the care pathway for patients with psychiatric disorders.
This study main objective is to compare the proportion of patients with a psychiatric disorder who will receive outpatient follow-up 1 month after a visit to a psychiatric emergency department without hospitalization (Group 1) versus 1 month after a consultation with a psychiatrist within 48 hours via the med@psy system (Group 2).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Mental Health Care Coordination for Transition Aged Youth
NCT03336892
Psychiatry and Individual Liberties: a Study of Institutions Characterized by a Reduced Use of Coercion
NCT05136989
Descriptive Study of Mental Activity
NCT02615925
Collaborative Nursing Care-based Intervention in Mental Health Day Hospital Users
NCT04814576
Alternative Care to the Accompaniment Called "Place of Respite" in the Resolution of the Psychotic Crises of Homeless People With Severe Mental Pathology
NCT03992105
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In the absence of easy access to second-line ambulatory care, the number of 'inappropriate' psychiatric emergency visits is increasing, with emergency departments becoming the gateway to mental health care. It is recognized that the deployment of earlier and more graduated care reduces the intensity of disorders, prescriptions for time off work and psychotropic drugs, and hospitalizations.
A new, more preventive, efficient and cost-effective approach to mental health is emerging, with psychiatrists working closely with GPs. This is the context in which the 'med@psy' system was set up in the Toulon-Provence-Mediterranean metropolitan area by a private psychiatrist. It facilitates access to psychiatric second referral for GPs by pooling the 48-hour supply of psychiatric consultations in real time. We assume that this system will facilitate access to outpatient psychiatric care and help to optimize the organisation of patient care and follow-up. The aim of this study is to evaluate the med@psy system in the care pathway for patients with psychiatric disorders.
This study main objective is to compare the proportion of patients with a psychiatric disorder who will received outpatient follow-up 1 month after a visit to a psychiatric emergency department without hospitalization (Group 1) versus 1 month after a consultation with a psychiatrist within 48 hours via the med@psy system (Group 2).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Emergency
Adult patients presenting to the emergency department of the Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer, whether or not referred by their general practitioner.
Clinical assessment by emergency psychiatrist
After a clinical assessment by the emergency department psychiatrist which does not lead to hospitalization, the patient will be given a psychiatric interview and sent home.
Med@Psy Platform
Adult patients referred by their general practioner for a psychiatric consultation via the med@psy system.
Psychiatric consultation booked through Med@Psy platform
The patient will be seen within 48 hours after the consultation with his or her general practitioner by a psychiatrist taking part in the study.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Clinical assessment by emergency psychiatrist
After a clinical assessment by the emergency department psychiatrist which does not lead to hospitalization, the patient will be given a psychiatric interview and sent home.
Psychiatric consultation booked through Med@Psy platform
The patient will be seen within 48 hours after the consultation with his or her general practitioner by a psychiatrist taking part in the study.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient presenting to the Centre hospitalier de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer emergency department, with or without referral, and receiving psychiatric advice with discharge without hospitalization after clinical assessment (Group 1) or patients referred for psychiatric consultation via the Med@psy system (Group 2).
* Patient with indication for outpatient follow-up
* Patient with open social security rights
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient currently being followed by a psychiatrist. Psychiatric follow-up is defined as at least one consultation with a psychiatrist in the last 3 months, outside an unscheduled care consultation or in an emergency department;
* Patients referred for a suicide attempt, violent or non-violent, serious or non-serious;
* Patients without a declared general practioner;
* Patients already included in the study;
* Patients who do not speak French;
* Patients under judicial protection (guardianship, curatorship, etc.) or safeguard of justice;
* Patient under compulsory care, under a care order or deprived of liberty.
* Any other reason which, in the investigator's opinion, could interfere
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Fabien Korrichi, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cabinet médical Korrichi (Med@psy program linked to this office)
Toulon, Var, France
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Toulon La Seyne sur Mer emergency reception service
Toulon, Var, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Truelove S, Ng V, Kates N, Alloo J, Sunderji N, Patriquin MJ. Les soins de sante mentale en collaboration: Mobiliser les systemes de sante pour soutenir une approche d'equipe. Can Fam Physician. 2023 Feb;69(2):86-88. doi: 10.46747/cfp.690286. No abstract available. French.
Jones SH, Thornicroft G, Coffey M, Dunn G. A brief mental health outcome scale-reliability and validity of the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). Br J Psychiatry. 1995 May;166(5):654-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.166.5.654.
Kates N, Arroll B, Currie E, Hanlon C, Gask L, Klasen H, Meadows G, Rukundo G, Sunderji N, Ruud T, Williams M. Improving collaboration between primary care and mental health services. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Dec;20(10):748-765. doi: 10.1080/15622975.2018.1471218. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2024-A01115-42
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2024-CHITS-005
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.