Alternative Care to the Accompaniment Called "Place of Respite" in the Resolution of the Psychotic Crises of Homeless People With Severe Mental Pathology

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-10-01

Study Completion Date

2020-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Document the effectiveness of the "Respite Site" program in relation to the current health system. Document in particular the number and type of constraints, lengths of hospitalization and mode of exit, as well as the exit destination of psychotic homeless people.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Optimizing Behavioral Health Homes for Adults With Serious Mental Illness

NCT02318797

Chronic Disease Mental Health Behavioral Health +4 more

COMPLETED NA

Recovery Bridge: Peer Intervention to Bridge Transition Post Discharge

NCT05758376

Mental Illness

COMPLETED NA

Optimizing Mental Health for Young People at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis (CHR)

NCT05757128

Psychosis Psychosocial Functioning

COMPLETED NA

At-risk Intervention and Mentoring Evaluation

NCT02174224

Violence

COMPLETED NA

Helping Families Pilot of a Family Resilience Program for Families Experiencing Homelessness

NCT04273126

Family Relationship Coping Skills

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Between 2012 and 2015, the practice of "stress-related care" related to crisis situations increased by 15%, with about 90,000 people under duress making France one of the European countries where practice most under stress. Being homeless, from a visible ethnic minority, combined with the lack of alternatives in the territory are well-documented risk factors for being hospitalized under duress. A review of the 2015 literature has shown that out-of-hospital crisis sites achieve results equivalent to those of conventional hospitalization in terms of reduced symptomatology and would have better outcomes in terms of increase in remission and recovery times of professional activity and social inclusion, with greater efficiency. In Marseille, an experimental device has shown its capacity to propose an alternative to hospitalization, for this type of population.Running the lessons of this experiment and inspired by the experimentation Parachute, a new device experimental, called "Place of respite", This place proposes a model of resolution of the psychotic crisis where the person decides the type of care that she wish to receive. It is a device that is therefore an alternative to conventional psychiatric care under duress. The investigators formulate the hypothesis that alternative support to the resolution of the crisis by using the skills of people with disorders severe psychiatric conditions in the experimental "Respite site" decreases in the short term the number of hospitalizations and their duration, as well as the experience of the constraint in the course of care of these people, compared to the subjects who did not benefit from this device and could represent a model of crisis management / psychiatric emergency efficient with regard to the current offer.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mental Health

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

historical cohort

150 homeless patients in crisis, identified from an extraction of the database of psychiatric emergencies of the same territory, and matched for age, sex, and main diagnosis.

Group Type OTHER

prospective cohort

Intervention Type OTHER

topics included openly in the "Respite Site", made up of the first 50 subjects followed prospectively

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

prospective cohort

topics included openly in the "Respite Site", made up of the first 50 subjects followed prospectively

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Over 18 years old Diagnosed with schizophrenia, bipolar I disorder, or schizoaffective disorder according to the DSMIV classification Homeless "ETHOS 1 or 2" (FEANTSA classification) In a crisis situation: psychiatric crisis (PANSS increase of more than 20%), social crisis (significant alteration of social relations) Affiliated to a social protection scheme Accepting to participate in the study An HCAT score greater than or equal to 3

Exclusion Criteria

Under 18 years old Participant in another study simultaneously in accordance with Article L112112 of the public health code Refusing to participate in the study, or whose legal representative refuses to participate in the study in the case of a person under guardianship or curatorship A score on the HCAT scale (decision-making competence) strictly less than 3

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No