Optimizing Behavioral Health Homes for Adults With Serious Mental Illness

NCT ID: NCT02318797

Last Updated: 2018-02-22

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1229 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-10-31

Study Completion Date

2017-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Adults with serious mental illness (SMI) frequently have unmet medical needs which place them at risk for adverse health outcomes. While there are proven ways to manage and/or prevent serious medical conditions common among this population, information is needed to understand their impact on outcomes that matter most for patients, particularly in community mental health centers (CMHCs) where most adults with SMI receive their care and rural areas where locating and receiving health care services can be challenging.

The investigators will test two promising ways for promoting the health, wellness, and recovery of adults with SMI. One way will help patients manage their health and health care through self-management strategies, including the use of a web portal, and peer support (patient self-directed care) and the other through interactions with nurses during clinic visits (provider-supported integrated care).

The investigators will compare the two interventions on three primary patient-centered outcomes (i.e. patient activation in care, health status, engagement in primary/specialty care). The investigators hypothesize that:

1. Patient self-directed care will result in improvement in patient activation.
2. Provider-supported integrated care will result in greater improvement in frequency in primary/specialty care visits.
3. Both interventions will result in significant improvements in the three primary outcomes.

The investigators will collect information from patients, caregivers, and clinic staff at different points in time during the study. Patients will be asked to complete questionnaires and additional data on their service use will be gathered. Some patients and providers will also be interviewed about their experiences with care. The investigators will examine these data to learn if, how, and why the new services improve outcomes over time. This information will help us understand patient and other stakeholder views about the services and, if appropriate, ensure their continued and/or expanded availability.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The combination of high medical need with difficulty accessing quality medical care makes adults with serious mental illness (SMI) one of our nation's most medically vulnerable populations. While evidence-based interventions exist for managing and/or preventing high rates of chronic medical conditions in this population, information is needed to understand their impact on outcomes that matter most for patients, particularly in community mental health centers (CMHCs) where most adults with SMI receive their care and rural areas where availability of and access to health care services is limited.

Building on the work of a multi-stakeholder collaboration in rural Pennsylvania, the UPMC Center for High-Value Health Care and our patient, provider, and payer partners will evaluate two promising interventions-patient self-directed care and provider-supported integrated care-for promoting the health, wellness, and recovery of adults with SMI. We will address four questions that patients have identified as important to them:

1. Given my mental and physical conditions, what should I expect will happen to my overall health, wellness, and recovery when I engage in the new services offered by my CMHC?
2. If I choose to participate in these services, what are the potential advantages or disadvantages to me?
3. In what ways can I become more active in managing my own health and health care?
4. Which of the services that my CMHC could make available to me will impact outcomes that I care about and help me make the best decisions about my health and care? Our aims compare the effectiveness of the interventions on patient-centered outcomes and explore the moderating role of patient characteristics and the mediating role of engagement in the interventions. By demonstrating which interventions improve outcomes for whom under what circumstances, we will inform positive patient heath choices and key stakeholder decision making to support these choices, thereby advancing health system improvement efforts to avoid early mortality and comorbidity in this population.

We have enrolled 1,229 Medicaid-enrolled adults who have or are at risk for chronic medical conditions and receive care at rural and suburban CMHCs. Using a cluster randomized design with a mixed-methods approach, we randomly assigned 11 CMHCs to one of the two interventions. Quantitative (self-report, claims, process) and qualitative (interviews) data will be gathered across multiple time points from baseline through the end of the two-year intervention. Descriptive and multivariate analyses will be used to examine the impact of the interventions on outcomes over time and explore the roles of moderating and mediating variables. Qualitative results will be used to understand patient and other stakeholder perspectives and promote dissemination and sustainability.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Disease Mental Health Behavioral Health Cardiovascular Disease Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 Substance-related Disorders Vascular Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patient Self-Directed Care

See intervention description

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Patient Self-Directed Care

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Patient self-management toolkits, web portal with information on health conditions, personal health care use data, health tracking tools and wellness programs

Provider-Supported Integrated Care

See intervention description

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Provider-Supported Integrated Care

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Registered nurse on staff at community mental health centers with access to patient-level physical health information to: 1) work with patients on coordinating their care, 2) enhance communication between providers and payer, and 3) provide patient wellness support and education

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Patient Self-Directed Care

Patient self-management toolkits, web portal with information on health conditions, personal health care use data, health tracking tools and wellness programs

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Provider-Supported Integrated Care

Registered nurse on staff at community mental health centers with access to patient-level physical health information to: 1) work with patients on coordinating their care, 2) enhance communication between providers and payer, and 3) provide patient wellness support and education

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults age 18 and older
* Serious mental illness (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression)
* Receive services at one of the 11 participating community mental health centers
* At least one claim for outpatient case management or peer specialist services

Exclusion Criteria

* Not willing to provide informed consent
* Assessed by clinicians as being too ill to be treated on an outpatient basis
* Unable to speak, read, or understand English at the minimum required level
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

UPMC Center for High-Value Health Care

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic of UPMC

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Community Care Behavioral Health Organization

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Columbia Montour Snyder Union Mental Health

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Behavioral Health Alliance of Rural Pennsylvania

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Pittsburgh

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Charles Reynolds

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Charles F. Reynolds, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Pittsburgh; UPMC Center for High-Value Health Care

James M. Schuster, MD, MBA

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Community Care Behavioral Health; UPMC Center for High-Value Health Care

Tracy A. Carney, AAS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Recovery Central Clubhouse, Columbia Montour Snyder Union Mental Health

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Community Care Behavioral Health Organizations

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PCORI 271

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Bringing Health Home
NCT05160701 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Improving Functioning Among Aging Women Veterans
NCT06580470 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Testing the Efficacy of ACT for Life
NCT04829682 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA