Investigating the Meaning and (Cost-)Effectiveness of Dutch Recovery Colleges

NCT ID: NCT05620212

Last Updated: 2025-08-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

142 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-03-17

Study Completion Date

2025-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Recovery colleges (RC) aim to promote the recovery of people who experience mental vulnerabilities. Rather than facilitating treatment of illness (as regular mental health care services \[MHCS\] do), RCs are learning environments, with a special focus on peer support and co-creation. While MHCS are founded on scientific and professional knowledge, RCs value the knowledge and abilities of those with lived experiences as such. By sharing experiences, RC attendees can inspire and support each other (hence 'peer support') and they can use their experiences to contribute to the educational program (hence 'co-creation'). In the Netherlands RCs are 100% peer run, meaning that no mental health care workers are involved.

Despite promising premature findings on the effectiveness of RC attendance (e.g., positive impacts on MHCS use, mental wellbeing and functioning, quality of life, empowerment and more), large, controlled studies are extremely scarce. Furthermore, the way RCs are managed in the Netherlands seems to differ from the RCs that have been studied before. While RCs in some countries are a coproduction of peers and mental health practitioners, RCs in the Netherlands are 100% peer run, although they are usually hosted by MHCS. In turn, this research project aims to investigate the (cost-)effectiveness of RCs in the Netherlands. In terms of effectiveness, we expect that RC attendance improves feelings of empowerment. Besides, we investigate impacts on quality of life, mental health, loneliness, satisfaction with treatment and support and self-stigma. We also determine the cost-effectiveness of Dutch RCs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This quantitative study is part of a larger research project that entails qualitative analysis of:

* the meaning of Enik RC for its partakers (the first RC established in the Netherlands in 2015);
* the position that RCs can and should have in the Dutch MHCS landscape;
* a fidelity measure to define the core elements of Dutch RCs and to obtain an overview of the available initiatives in the Netherlands

The research project is executed in close collaboration with co-researchers who are partakers of Enik RC. The findings of the pre-registered quantitative study will be evaluated and contextualized in co-creation as such.

NOTE: The Observational Study Model is both Cohort (monitoring for a period of 2 years) and Case-Control (comparing RC partakers with non-partakers).

NOTE: Enik Recovery College has 7 established locations in the region of Utrecht at the time of our recruitment. All are included.

NOTE: Fameus has 4 established locations (Breda 2x, Tilburg, Roosendaal). All are included.

NOTE: This study is conducted both by Tilburg University (Department Tranzo) and Trimbos-institute (Department of Reintegration and Community Care) as primary organizations. The PI is also affiliated with both.

NOTE. The aimed sample size at t0 is N=120 in the RC condition. So 120 partakers of RCs will be matched with members from the PPG.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Severe Mental Illness Mental Vulnerabilities

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

RC Group

Recovery College partakers in any way (see description of intervention).

Recovery College participation

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Recovery College participation in any way (visitors, course/retreat participants, volunteers, employees).

Control Group

Participants with similar mental health profile as RC group, but do not participate in an RC. These participants are sampled from the Panel Psychisch Gezien (PPG), monitored by the Trimbos-institute.

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Recovery College participation

Recovery College participation in any way (visitors, course/retreat participants, volunteers, employees).

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* For RC group: needs to attend one of the four participating RCs regularly, at least more than once.
* Needs to experience severe mental illness/psychological vulnerabilities (both self-reported or officially diagnosed).
* Needs to master the Dutch language to sufficient extent to understand the surveys.
* Is 18 years or older.

Exclusion Criteria

* For the RC group: does not attend one of the four participating RCs regularly.
* Does not experience severe mental illness/psychological vulnerabilities.
* Does not master the Dutch language to a sufficient extent.
* Is younger than 18 years old.
* For the control group (PPG): attends an RC regularly, but not one of the four participating RCs. If an existing PPG member attends one of the four participating RCs regularly, they are allocated to the RC group.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Trimbos-institute (also primary organization conducting the study)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Lister

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Gemeente Utrecht

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Stichting tot steun VCVGZ

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Tilburg University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hans Kroon

PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Korak

Apeldoorn, , Netherlands

Site Status

Herstelacademie Haarlem en Meer

Haarlem, , Netherlands

Site Status

Fameus

Tilburg, , Netherlands

Site Status

Enik Recovery College

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

van Wezel MMC, Muusse C, van de Mheen D, Wijnen B, den Hollander W, Kroon H. What do we not know (yet) about recovery colleges? A study protocol on their (cost-)effectiveness, mechanisms of action, fidelity and positioning. BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 8;23(1):816. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05293-8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37940915 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TSB_RP390

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Intensive Support Teams Study
NCT03586375 COMPLETED