Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
150 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-02-09
2025-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Family Planning Counseling for Women With Chronic Medical Conditions in an Inpatient Setting
NCT05859087
Mental Health Care Coordination for Transition Aged Youth
NCT03336892
Reproductive Life Planning for Women With Mental Illness
NCT03969589
Shared Mental Health Care Linking Mental Health Services With Family Medicine Groups
NCT00212966
Addressing Intimate Partner Violence, Mental Health, and HIV in Antenatal Care
NCT05389358
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Women can experience significant reproductive health problems including reduced fertility due to pharmacology use, high rates of unplanned pregnancies, safeguarding processes and increased rate of malformations in their offspring.
NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) guidelines recommend discussing with women of childbearing potential who have or had mental health problems the use of contraception and any plans of pregnancy, how pregnancy and childbirth might affect a mental health problem and how mental health problem and its treatment might affect the women, the foetus or baby. Although international and national legislation clearly acknowledges equal rights for women with disabilities with regards to family planning, they continue to face challenges in accessing these SRH.
Women who experience severe and persistent mental health issues are more likely to experience unplanned pregnancy, maybe likely to engage in sexual risk taking behaviour and are at a higher risk of sexually transmitted diseases. A recent systematic review estimates that in the UK, at any given time, 9-10% of women will be parents with mental disorder. There are well-established links between parental mental disorder and poor outcomes in children, although not all children are at risk. Throughout the period of foetal development, infancy and toddlerhood the brain of a baby is growing and developing.) These first 1001 days are critical because of optimal brain development and also gives the baby the best possible start in life. People who lack nurture from one or more caring adults in the first 1001 days of their lives achieve less in education and in the world of work; are more likely to behave anti-socially, and are less healthy, physically as well as mentally, than individuals who were given a better start. Furthermore, the harm done to them is likely to be perpetuated in an inter-generational cycle when they have children of their own .
The investigators also looked at some more scientific evidence from the point of view of mental health professionals. Mental health professionals are poor at collecting information regarding the parenting status of their patients and tend not to enquire about children's welfare and needs. In addition, mental health professionals report patients' lack of insight regarding the illness and its impact on children, insufficient knowledge and skills and concerns that discussing parenting and child-related issues might impair the relationship they have with their patient. A research study has found that 16% of childbearing age women were prescribed teratogens. For women with mental health conditions who want to avoid unintended pregnancy, effective contraceptive use can be an important strategy to maintain and even improve health and wellbeing. Barriers in the provision of appropriate reproductive advice includes difficulties in determining "best interests", feeling ill-equipped to discuss sexual and reproductive health due to perceived boundaries and embarrassment, and ethical challenges.
Study Design An observational quantitative cross-sectional design study will be utilised. The investigators will not intervene in any way but simply record the answers to questionnaire of the study participants. All the measurements for the participants will be obtained at a single point in time, although recruitment may take place across a longer period. This is the most suitable method for this study as it minimises loss to follow up, obtrusiveness and response bias and will allow for future replicability and comparisons across other NHS Trusts.
Participants / Population This will be a two-armed study sampling service user of childbearing age receiving SABP mental health care services and mental health care professionals. The study will seek to recruit patients from inpatient units and community mental health teams from Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (SABP) and Mental health care professionals from the Trust.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Female service users of childbearing age
Contraception Advice Experiences Survey - using a self-report questionnaire of female service users.
No interventions assigned to this group
Mental health care professionals
Contraception in Mental Health Survey - self-report questionnaire of professionals' current practices, attitude and knowledge
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Female aged between 18 and 50 years of age.
* Under SABP mental health services
* Diagnosed DSM IV mental health condition.
* Capacity to give informed consent.
Professionals
* Doctors, nursing staff Band 6 or above, non-medical prescribers and care- coordinators.
* Employed by Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation
Exclusion Criteria
* Service users under specialist services such as eating disorders, perinatal services, substance misuse services.
* Service users under Child and Adolescent Mental Health services and Learning Disability Mental Health Services.
* Lacking capacity to consent.
* Under 18 or over 50 years of age
* Service users detained under the Mental Health Act in the inpatient unit or under community treatment order(CTO) in the community.
Professionals
* Mental health professionals not employed by Surrey \& Borders Partnership Foundation NHS Trust
* Mental health professionals not working in Working Age Adult Services.
18 Years
50 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Josie Jenkinson, MRCPsych
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Surrey and Borders NHS Foundation Trust
Leatherhead, Surrey, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Arain M, Campbell MJ, Cooper CL, Lancaster GA. What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Jul 16;10:67. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-67.
Gee B, Notley C, Byrne R, Clarke T, Hodgekins J, French P, Fowler D. Young people's experiences of Social Recovery Cognitive Behavioural Therapy and treatment as usual in the PRODIGY trial. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;12(5):879-885. doi: 10.1111/eip.12381. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
Haslegrave M. Ensuring the inclusion of sexual and reproductive health and rights under a sustainable development goal on health in the post-2015 human rights framework for development. Reprod Health Matters. 2013 Nov;21(42):61-73. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(13)42742-8.
Henshaw, C & Protti, C (2010) Addressing the sexual and reproductive health needs of women who use mental health services, and Advances in psychiatric treatment Vol 16, 272 - 278.
Howard LM, Megnin-Viggars O, Symington I, Pilling S; Guideline Development Group. Antenatal and postnatal mental health: summary of updated NICE guidance. BMJ. 2014 Dec 18;349:g7394. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7394. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRAS 284443
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.