Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
COMPLETED
Total Enrollment
43 participants
Study Classification
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Start Date
2021-05-10
Study Completion Date
2022-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Background:
Patient safety incidents are a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. So far, existing safety improvement work has largely focused on physical healthcare. Only a small body of research has studied safety as it applies to mental healthcare, with these studies concentrating primarily on psychiatric inpatient units. However, mental healthcare is increasingly delivered in community settings, through primary care and secondary care mental health provision, rather than in hospitals. Less is known about the safety problems service users experience in community-based mental healthcare. It is important that safety problems in community-based mental health services are better understood, so that care can be improved.
Objective:
This research will aim to understand the nature of the safety problems experienced by adult users of community-based mental healthcare, from the perspective of service users, carers, and healthcare providers. The study will also aim to identify priority areas and effective practices to improve safety in these settings.
Method:
Individual in-depth interviews or focus groups will be held with service users, carers, and frontline healthcare providers employed within appropriate community-based mental healthcare settings. Interviews or focus groups will last for approximately one hour and will be carried out face-to-face or via secure videoconferencing technology (e.g. Microsoft Teams or Zoom), depending on up-to-date guidance relating to the Covid-19 pandemic. With participant consent, interviews and focus groups will be audio-recorded and transcribed. Transcripts will be analysed using thematic analysis, with themes developed, defined, and revised throughout the analysis process.
Discussion:
Study findings will help to fill key evidence gaps concerning safety in community-based mental healthcare. More broadly, the results may lead to the development of evidence-informed interventions to address the safety issues which are raised in participant discussions.
Patient safety incidents are a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. So far, existing safety improvement work has largely focused on physical healthcare. Only a small body of research has studied safety as it applies to mental healthcare, with these studies concentrating primarily on psychiatric inpatient units. However, mental healthcare is increasingly delivered in community settings, through primary care and secondary care mental health provision, rather than in hospitals. Less is known about the safety problems service users experience in community-based mental healthcare. It is important that safety problems in community-based mental health services are better understood, so that care can be improved.
Objective:
This research will aim to understand the nature of the safety problems experienced by adult users of community-based mental healthcare, from the perspective of service users, carers, and healthcare providers. The study will also aim to identify priority areas and effective practices to improve safety in these settings.
Method:
Individual in-depth interviews or focus groups will be held with service users, carers, and frontline healthcare providers employed within appropriate community-based mental healthcare settings. Interviews or focus groups will last for approximately one hour and will be carried out face-to-face or via secure videoconferencing technology (e.g. Microsoft Teams or Zoom), depending on up-to-date guidance relating to the Covid-19 pandemic. With participant consent, interviews and focus groups will be audio-recorded and transcribed. Transcripts will be analysed using thematic analysis, with themes developed, defined, and revised throughout the analysis process.
Discussion:
Study findings will help to fill key evidence gaps concerning safety in community-based mental healthcare. More broadly, the results may lead to the development of evidence-informed interventions to address the safety issues which are raised in participant discussions.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The (Cost-) Effectiveness of Mindfulness-training and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy in Adolescents and Young Adults With Deliberate Self Harm
NCT00694668
Self-Injurious Behavior
UNKNOWN
PHASE2/PHASE3
A Qualitative Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation of Safety Planning
NCT05878743
Risk Behavior, Health
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Suicide Prevention for Substance Using Youth Experiencing Homelessness
NCT05994612
Suicide Prevention
RECRUITING
NA
Mental Health Care Coordination for Transition Aged Youth
NCT03336892
Mental Health
COMPLETED
NA
Evaluation of the Quality of Telephone Calls to a Suicide Prevention Helpline
NCT06130943
Suicide Prevention
Suicidal Ideation
COMPLETED
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Background:
Patient safety problems are widespread. Research suggests that around 10% of inpatients experience an adverse event during their hospital admission, with almost half of these incidents judged to be preventable. There have been considerable advancements in initiatives to improve patient safety in medical settings in the past 20 years. However, safety in mental healthcare remains an under-researched and poorly understood issue, with only a limited amount of research having explored safety as it uniquely applies to this population. Self-harm, suicide, and coercive interventions (such as physical restraint) are some of the specific risks which may affect mental health service users.
The small body of research focusing on safety in mental healthcare has primarily concentrated on hospital-based inpatient care. This is problematic for improving mental healthcare safety and quality, as only a minority of mental healthcare episodes take place within psychiatric inpatient services. As such, research into the types of safety problem experienced by users of community-based mental healthcare is of great importance to improving care and reducing harm.
Despite a willingness to share their perspectives, mental health service users and carers have reported barriers to raising their safety concerns with professionals. These include feeling as if their concerns were not listened to, as well as challenges associated with the process of raising a complaint whilst unwell. Likewise, frontline care providers and service managers within mental health services can also provide different yet complementary professional insights into safety.
Community-based mental healthcare provision is diverse, often involving complex relationships between and joint responsibly of multiple agencies. Because of this, the safety problems associated with different care pathways are likely to be varied in nature. In order to fully understand safety and broader quality of care problems, it is important to draw upon the perspectives of mental health service users, carers, and healthcare providers from a range of community settings. Using qualitative research methods, this research will begin to address this evidence gap, focusing on services for working-aged adults.
Aims:
The primary aim of this study is to gain a deeper understanding of the safety problems which occur in the context of community-based mental healthcare. Specifically, drawing upon the perspectives of multiple stakeholder groups, including service users, carers and frontline care providers, the objectives are to investigate the following:
1. To explore perspectives on the meaning of 'safety' in mental healthcare;
2. To understand the nature of the safety problems faced by people accessing community-based mental health services;
3. To learn about experiences of good practice in the delivery of safe mental healthcare;
4. To identify priority areas and strategies for intervention to improve care safety.
Study design:
The study design will comprise in-depth qualitative interviews or focus groups, with three participant groups: (a) working-age adult service users, (b) carers, (c) staff within community-based mental health services (frontline providers and service managers). The research team consulted with service users and carers about the study design, and received positive feedback about the proposal to conduct either individual qualitative interviews or focus groups.
Data analysis:
Interviews and focus groups will be audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim by a professional transcription company from King's College London's list of approved suppliers. Prior to analysis, any interview or focus groups excerpts containing information which could potentially identify the participant, will be redacted. Interview and focus group data will be managed in NVivo and analysed using a reflexive approach to thematic analysis, according to the methodologies outlined by Braun and Clarke (2006). Themes will be developed and revised through an iterative process.
Paper consent forms will be stored in a locked filing cabinet within the university premises, to which only the research team will have access. Digital files, such as interview transcripts and electronically completed consent forms, will be stored on the researcher's secure university account server, which is password protected. Audio recordings will also be stored here up until the point of transcription, after which they will be securely deleted. Data will be stored anonymously and archived in line with King's College London's policy on data storage.
Study setting:
This study will focus on service users, carers, and staff members employed within general adult community-based mental health services. Community-based mental health services herein refers to non-institutional mental health services which deliver multidisciplinary care accessed by service users living independently, or in supported accommodation (excluding settings with 24-hour on-site care from qualified nurses, which resemble institutional care models). As such, participants associated with a range of settings may be recruited, including community mental health services within secondary care (e.g. Assertive Outreach Services) and mental health support available through primary care (e.g. from a general practitioner).
Sampling:
In order to capture a range of perspectives, participants will be purposively sampled according to several key characteristics. The recruitment strategy will aim to recruit service users, carers, and healthcare professionals who have experience of different types of community-based mental health services. To reflect the range of care contexts and professional roles, the investigators will seek to sample healthcare professionals from different disciplinary backgrounds. This will likely include clinical service managers, psychiatrists, occupational therapists, nurses, social workers, and psychologists. Efforts will be made to recruit people within each group who represent a range of sociodemographic characteristics, including participants of different sexes and from different ethnic groups.
Potential participants will be recruited via community-based mental health services and via an open recruitment call (e.g. via online advertisements, or existing service user and carer network newsletter mailings). Snowball sampling techniques may also be used to supplement the sample. As such, recruited participants may be asked to invite other people they know to contact the research team directly, if they are interested in taking part and meet the study eligibility criteria. These sampling approaches have been selected due to their appropriateness for qualitative research which seeks to capture the range and diversity of participant perspectives, rather than aiming to achieve a representative study sample.
Procedure:
Those who express interest in taking part will receive a participant information sheet at least 24 hours before taking part in a scheduled interview or focus group. Potential participants will have the opportunity to ask questions and receive further information about the study before deciding whether to take part and providing their informed consent. Interviews or focus groups will last for approximately one hour and be conducted in a private space. Interviews and focus groups will be primarily conducted remotely (due to COVID-19 safety considerations) via secure digital communications software (e.g. Microsoft Teams or Zoom). Where face-to-face interviews are held, these will be conducted in accordance with up-to-date safety guidance.
Patient safety problems are widespread. Research suggests that around 10% of inpatients experience an adverse event during their hospital admission, with almost half of these incidents judged to be preventable. There have been considerable advancements in initiatives to improve patient safety in medical settings in the past 20 years. However, safety in mental healthcare remains an under-researched and poorly understood issue, with only a limited amount of research having explored safety as it uniquely applies to this population. Self-harm, suicide, and coercive interventions (such as physical restraint) are some of the specific risks which may affect mental health service users.
The small body of research focusing on safety in mental healthcare has primarily concentrated on hospital-based inpatient care. This is problematic for improving mental healthcare safety and quality, as only a minority of mental healthcare episodes take place within psychiatric inpatient services. As such, research into the types of safety problem experienced by users of community-based mental healthcare is of great importance to improving care and reducing harm.
Despite a willingness to share their perspectives, mental health service users and carers have reported barriers to raising their safety concerns with professionals. These include feeling as if their concerns were not listened to, as well as challenges associated with the process of raising a complaint whilst unwell. Likewise, frontline care providers and service managers within mental health services can also provide different yet complementary professional insights into safety.
Community-based mental healthcare provision is diverse, often involving complex relationships between and joint responsibly of multiple agencies. Because of this, the safety problems associated with different care pathways are likely to be varied in nature. In order to fully understand safety and broader quality of care problems, it is important to draw upon the perspectives of mental health service users, carers, and healthcare providers from a range of community settings. Using qualitative research methods, this research will begin to address this evidence gap, focusing on services for working-aged adults.
Aims:
The primary aim of this study is to gain a deeper understanding of the safety problems which occur in the context of community-based mental healthcare. Specifically, drawing upon the perspectives of multiple stakeholder groups, including service users, carers and frontline care providers, the objectives are to investigate the following:
1. To explore perspectives on the meaning of 'safety' in mental healthcare;
2. To understand the nature of the safety problems faced by people accessing community-based mental health services;
3. To learn about experiences of good practice in the delivery of safe mental healthcare;
4. To identify priority areas and strategies for intervention to improve care safety.
Study design:
The study design will comprise in-depth qualitative interviews or focus groups, with three participant groups: (a) working-age adult service users, (b) carers, (c) staff within community-based mental health services (frontline providers and service managers). The research team consulted with service users and carers about the study design, and received positive feedback about the proposal to conduct either individual qualitative interviews or focus groups.
Data analysis:
Interviews and focus groups will be audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim by a professional transcription company from King's College London's list of approved suppliers. Prior to analysis, any interview or focus groups excerpts containing information which could potentially identify the participant, will be redacted. Interview and focus group data will be managed in NVivo and analysed using a reflexive approach to thematic analysis, according to the methodologies outlined by Braun and Clarke (2006). Themes will be developed and revised through an iterative process.
Paper consent forms will be stored in a locked filing cabinet within the university premises, to which only the research team will have access. Digital files, such as interview transcripts and electronically completed consent forms, will be stored on the researcher's secure university account server, which is password protected. Audio recordings will also be stored here up until the point of transcription, after which they will be securely deleted. Data will be stored anonymously and archived in line with King's College London's policy on data storage.
Study setting:
This study will focus on service users, carers, and staff members employed within general adult community-based mental health services. Community-based mental health services herein refers to non-institutional mental health services which deliver multidisciplinary care accessed by service users living independently, or in supported accommodation (excluding settings with 24-hour on-site care from qualified nurses, which resemble institutional care models). As such, participants associated with a range of settings may be recruited, including community mental health services within secondary care (e.g. Assertive Outreach Services) and mental health support available through primary care (e.g. from a general practitioner).
Sampling:
In order to capture a range of perspectives, participants will be purposively sampled according to several key characteristics. The recruitment strategy will aim to recruit service users, carers, and healthcare professionals who have experience of different types of community-based mental health services. To reflect the range of care contexts and professional roles, the investigators will seek to sample healthcare professionals from different disciplinary backgrounds. This will likely include clinical service managers, psychiatrists, occupational therapists, nurses, social workers, and psychologists. Efforts will be made to recruit people within each group who represent a range of sociodemographic characteristics, including participants of different sexes and from different ethnic groups.
Potential participants will be recruited via community-based mental health services and via an open recruitment call (e.g. via online advertisements, or existing service user and carer network newsletter mailings). Snowball sampling techniques may also be used to supplement the sample. As such, recruited participants may be asked to invite other people they know to contact the research team directly, if they are interested in taking part and meet the study eligibility criteria. These sampling approaches have been selected due to their appropriateness for qualitative research which seeks to capture the range and diversity of participant perspectives, rather than aiming to achieve a representative study sample.
Procedure:
Those who express interest in taking part will receive a participant information sheet at least 24 hours before taking part in a scheduled interview or focus group. Potential participants will have the opportunity to ask questions and receive further information about the study before deciding whether to take part and providing their informed consent. Interviews or focus groups will last for approximately one hour and be conducted in a private space. Interviews and focus groups will be primarily conducted remotely (due to COVID-19 safety considerations) via secure digital communications software (e.g. Microsoft Teams or Zoom). Where face-to-face interviews are held, these will be conducted in accordance with up-to-date safety guidance.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Mental Illness
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Observational Model Type
OTHER
Study Time Perspective
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Service users
Up to 20 people with current or recent experience of using community-based mental health services will be recruited to the study. Participants will take part in one in-depth interview or focus group discussion.
None - this is an exploratory qualitative study to understand patient safety problems in community-based mental healthcare.
Intervention Type
OTHER
Qualitative study
Carers
Up to 20 family members/ carers with experience of supporting another adult who is accessing community-based mental health services, will be recruited to the study. Participants will take part in one in-depth interview or focus group discussion.
None - this is an exploratory qualitative study to understand patient safety problems in community-based mental healthcare.
Intervention Type
OTHER
Qualitative study
Healthcare professionals
Up to 20 healthcare professionals from different disciplinary backgrounds and community-based mental health services will be recruited to the study. Participants will take part in one in-depth interview or focus group discussion.
None - this is an exploratory qualitative study to understand patient safety problems in community-based mental healthcare.
Intervention Type
OTHER
Qualitative study
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
None - this is an exploratory qualitative study to understand patient safety problems in community-based mental healthcare.
Qualitative study
Intervention Type
OTHER
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Over 18 years old.
* Able to speak sufficient English to provide informed consent to take part in an interview or focus group.
* Current or prior experience of using general adult community-based mental health services (within the past 12 months).
* Over 18 years old.
* Able to speak sufficient English to provide informed consent to take part in an interview or focus group.
* Current or prior experience of caring for an individual accessing general adult community-based mental health services (within the past 12 months).
* Over 18 years old.
* Able to speak sufficient English to provide informed consent to take part in an interview or focus group.
* Currently employed within a community-based service which provides general adult mental healthcare.
* Able to speak sufficient English to provide informed consent to take part in an interview or focus group.
* Current or prior experience of using general adult community-based mental health services (within the past 12 months).
* Over 18 years old.
* Able to speak sufficient English to provide informed consent to take part in an interview or focus group.
* Current or prior experience of caring for an individual accessing general adult community-based mental health services (within the past 12 months).
* Over 18 years old.
* Able to speak sufficient English to provide informed consent to take part in an interview or focus group.
* Currently employed within a community-based service which provides general adult mental healthcare.
Exclusion Criteria
* Unable to speak sufficient English to take part in an interview or focus group.
* Unable to give informed consent to take part in an interview or focus group.
* Currently receiving inpatient mental healthcare at a psychiatric hospital, or care from a service for older adults.
* Deemed by the researcher to be distressed or too unwell to take part in an interview or focus group.
* Their experience of services primarily falls outside of the remit of general adult mental health services, e.g. they have a primary diagnosis of Substance Use Disorder, or their care is provided by specialist tertiary care providers such as forensic mental health services.
Carers.
* Unable to speak sufficient English to take part in an interview or focus group.
* Unable to give informed consent to take part in an interview or focus group.
* Carers who have a caring responsibility for:
* A child (0-17 years),
* An individual using older adult mental health services,
* An adult using services which fall outside of the remit of general adult mental health services,
* Someone without a mental health problem.
Healthcare professionals.
* Unable to speak sufficient English to take part in an interview or focus group.
* Unable to give informed consent to take part in an interview or focus group.
* Healthcare professionals who are currently working in a mental health service which:
* Is not based in a community setting (e.g. inpatient care),
* Falls outside of the remit of general adult mental health services,
* Provides services to children (0-17 years) or older adults.
* Unable to give informed consent to take part in an interview or focus group.
* Currently receiving inpatient mental healthcare at a psychiatric hospital, or care from a service for older adults.
* Deemed by the researcher to be distressed or too unwell to take part in an interview or focus group.
* Their experience of services primarily falls outside of the remit of general adult mental health services, e.g. they have a primary diagnosis of Substance Use Disorder, or their care is provided by specialist tertiary care providers such as forensic mental health services.
Carers.
* Unable to speak sufficient English to take part in an interview or focus group.
* Unable to give informed consent to take part in an interview or focus group.
* Carers who have a caring responsibility for:
* A child (0-17 years),
* An individual using older adult mental health services,
* An adult using services which fall outside of the remit of general adult mental health services,
* Someone without a mental health problem.
Healthcare professionals.
* Unable to speak sufficient English to take part in an interview or focus group.
* Unable to give informed consent to take part in an interview or focus group.
* Healthcare professionals who are currently working in a mental health service which:
* Is not based in a community setting (e.g. inpatient care),
* Falls outside of the remit of general adult mental health services,
* Provides services to children (0-17 years) or older adults.
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
King's College London
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Responsibility Role
SPONSOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Claire Henderson, FRCPsych
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
King's College London
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London
London, Greater London, United Kingdom
Site Status
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
United Kingdom
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
279409
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
Mental Health and Well-being of People Who Seek Help From Their Member of Parliament
NCT04203966
COMPLETED
Development of a Positive Psychology Intervention to Reduce Suicide Risk
NCT01398891
COMPLETED
NA
The ACCEPT Study: Improving the Process of Disclosing Adverse Childhood Experiences in Community Mental Health
NCT06477380
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
Safer Online Lives: Use of the Internet & Social Media by People With Intellectual Disabilities
NCT04919213
COMPLETED
Using Machine Learning to Detect Risky Behavior in Psychiatric Clinics
NCT06421480
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Mental Health and Sexuality in Adolescents and Young Adults
NCT05316948
RECRUITING
Effectiveness of Standard Emergency Department Psychiatric Treatment Associated With Treatment Delivery by a Suicide Prevention Center
NCT00641498
COMPLETED
NA
A Quality Improvement Process to Support Delivery of Cardiovascular Care in Community Mental Health Organizations
NCT04696653
COMPLETED
NA
Healthcare for Men with Suicidal Thoughts: Needs Assessment
NCT06375200
COMPLETED
Supplementing Brief Psychotherapy With a Mobile App
NCT05867316
COMPLETED
NA
Therapeutic Evaluative Conditioning to Reduce Adolescents' Self-injurious Thoughts and Behaviors During and After Psychiatric Inpatient Hospitalization
NCT05796531
RECRUITING
NA
A Brief Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Suicidal Ideation
NCT04099173
COMPLETED
NA
Online Suicide Prevention Campaign Aimed at Men
NCT05530941
COMPLETED
NA
The Integrated Care Model for Homeless Mothers
NCT02723058
COMPLETED
NA
Effectiveness of a Telephone Intervention to Improve the Mental Health of Abused Women
NCT01054898
COMPLETED
NA
Qualitative Assessment of the Brief Contact Intervention "Stay in Contact" in Suicide Prevention
NCT03325478
COMPLETED
Improving the Quality of Care in Nursing Homes
NCT00572221
COMPLETED
NA
Skills to Enhance Positive Affect in Suicidal Adolescents
NCT02130583
COMPLETED
NA
Effectiveness and Implementation of a Clinician Decision Support System to Prevent Suicidal Behaviors
NCT05671133
RECRUITING
NA
Improving Care Provided to Patients Treated in a Level 1 Trauma Center Post-suicide Attempt
NCT01355848
COMPLETED
PHASE1
Psychiatry and Individual Liberties: a Study of Institutions Characterized by a Reduced Use of Coercion
NCT05136989
RECRUITING
Contraception and Mental Health: Are we Doing Enough?
NCT05838859
UNKNOWN
Effectiveness of a Family-Based Intervention for Adolescent Suicide Attempters (The SAFETY Study)
NCT00692302
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
ACCeptation and Qualitative Evaluation of Phone-delivered Intervention
NCT02949453
COMPLETED
NA