Qualitative Assessment of the Brief Contact Intervention "Stay in Contact" in Suicide Prevention
NCT ID: NCT03325478
Last Updated: 2017-10-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
60 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-05-18
2017-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Aim: Understand mechanisms of BCIs after suicide attempt, through patient's experience of a French BCI "Stay in contact" and assess its impact on seeking care during suicidal crisis.
Method:This is a single-center, non-interventional, prospective qualitative study using phone call interview on a BCI, 6 months after suicide attempt behavior.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using statistical software (Version 9.4, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA). Chi-squared test was used to assess qualitative variables and t-test to evaluate quantitative variables, with p\<.05 considered significant.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Over the phone interviews on the BCI "Stay in Contact"
This study used phone call interviews on a BCI "Stay in Contact", 6 months after suicide attempt behavior.The questionnaire used for the interview of included suicide attempters was pilot tested to assess acceptability and feasibility of the study. It included 24 questions, which were based on literature's data.They covered seeking care and help items and assess the subjective quality appreciation of medical care in the PED and on the BCI.Closed-ended and multiple-choice questions were mixed. Included patients were informed that the questionnaire was anonymous and that seeking their views and feedbacks would help adjusting the implementation of follow-up interventions closer to their needs.The baseline interviews were conducted on the phone, on weekdays, during a mean time of 10 to 15minutes by a trained resident in psychiatry as the only interviewer.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Central Hospital, Nancy, France
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Catherine Pichene
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Psychiatric Emergency Departement, Central Hospital, Nancy, France
Fabienne Ligier
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Psychiatric Emergency Departement, Central Hospital, Nancy, France
Sondos Abdalla
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Psychiatric Emergency Departement, Central Hospital, Nancy, France
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Central Hospital
Nancy, Lorraine, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cedereke M, Monti K, Ojehagen A. Telephone contact with patients in the year after a suicide attempt: does it affect treatment attendance and outcome? A randomised controlled study. Eur Psychiatry. 2002 Apr;17(2):82-91. doi: 10.1016/s0924-9338(02)00632-6.
Hawton K, van Heeringen K. Suicide. Lancet. 2009 Apr 18;373(9672):1372-81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60372-X.
Hawton K, Saunders K, Topiwala A, Haw C. Psychiatric disorders in patients presenting to hospital following self-harm: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2013 Dec;151(3):821-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.08.020. Epub 2013 Sep 7.
Gruat G, Cottencin O, Ducrocq F, Duhem S, Vaiva G. [Patient satisfaction regarding further telephone contact following attempted suicide]. Encephale. 2010 Jun;36 Suppl 2:D7-D13. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2009.10.009. Epub 2009 Dec 1. French.
Milner A, Spittal MJ, Kapur N, Witt K, Pirkis J, Carter G. Mechanisms of brief contact interventions in clinical populations: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Jun 8;16:194. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0896-4.
Castaigne E, Hardy P, Mouaffak F. [Follow-up interventions after suicide attempt. What tools, what effects and how to assess them?]. Encephale. 2017 Feb;43(1):75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Sep 28. French.
Kapur N, Cooper J, Bennewith O, Gunnell D, Hawton K. Postcards, green cards and telephone calls: therapeutic contact with individuals following self-harm. Br J Psychiatry. 2010 Jul;197(1):5-7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.072496.
Pirkis J, Burgess P, Meadows G, Dunt D. Self-reported needs for care among persons who have suicidal ideation or who have attempted suicide. Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Mar;52(3):381-3. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.3.381.
Burgess P, Pirkis J, Morton J, Croke E. Lessons from a comprehensive clinical audit of users of psychiatric services who committed suicide. Psychiatr Serv. 2000 Dec;51(12):1555-60. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.51.12.1555.
Appleby L, Shaw J, Amos T, McDonnell R, Harris C, McCann K, Kiernan K, Davies S, Bickley H, Parsons R. Suicide within 12 months of contact with mental health services: national clinical survey. BMJ. 1999 May 8;318(7193):1235-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7193.1235.
Motto JA, Bostrom AG. A randomized controlled trial of postcrisis suicide prevention. Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Jun;52(6):828-33. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.6.828.
Foster T, Gillespie K, McClelland R. Mental disorders and suicide in Northern Ireland. Br J Psychiatry. 1997 May;170:447-52. doi: 10.1192/bjp.170.5.447.
Hawton K et al. Attempted suicide : a practical Guide to its nature and management, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1987
Kerkhof A al. Repetition of attempted suicide: results from the WHO/EU Multicentre Study on Parasuicide, repetition-prediction part. 7th European Symposium on Suicide and Suicidal Behaviour. Ghent: University Press; 1998
Rygnestad T. [A 15-year follow-up study after deliberate self-poisoning]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1997 Sep 10;117(21):3065-9. Norwegian.
Schmidtke A, Bille-Brahe U, DeLeo D, Kerkhof A, Bjerke T, Crepet P, Haring C, Hawton K, Lonnqvist J, Michel K, Pommereau X, Querejeta I, Phillipe I, Salander-Renberg E, Temesvary B, Wasserman D, Fricke S, Weinacker B, Sampaio-Faria JG. Attempted suicide in Europe: rates, trends and sociodemographic characteristics of suicide attempters during the period 1989-1992. Results of the WHO/EURO Multicentre Study on Parasuicide. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1996 May;93(5):327-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1996.tb10656.x.
Gilbody S, House A, Owens D. The early repetition of deliberate self harm. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1997 Mar-Apr;31(2):171-2.
Lönnqvist J et al.Suicide following the first suicide attempt: a five-year follow-up using a survival analysis. Psychiatr Fenn 1991;22:1719
Van Heeringen K. The management of non-compliance with outpatient after-care in suicide attempters: a review. Ital J Suicidol 1992 ; 2 : 79-83
Evans MO, Morgan HG, Hayward A, Gunnell DJ. Crisis telephone consultation for deliberate self-harm patients: effects on repetition. Br J Psychiatry. 1999 Jul;175:23-7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.175.1.23.
Vaiva G, Vaiva G, Ducrocq F, Meyer P, Mathieu D, Philippe A, Libersa C, Goudemand M. Effect of telephone contact on further suicide attempts in patients discharged from an emergency department: randomised controlled study. BMJ. 2006 May 27;332(7552):1241-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7552.1241.
Lebow JL. Client satisfaction with mental health treat- ment: Methodological considerations in assessment. Eval Rev 1983; 7:729-52
Aoun S, Johnson L. A consumer's perspective of a suicide intervention programme. Aust N Z J Ment Health Nurs. 2001 Jun;10(2):97-104. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-0979.2001.00199.x.
Nguyen TD, Attkisson CC, Stegner BL. Assessment of patient satisfaction: development and refinement of a service evaluation questionnaire. Eval Program Plann. 1983;6(3-4):299-313. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(83)90010-1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2017-A01023-50
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id