Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
366 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-08-01
2026-07-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Ciprofol is a new intravenous anesthetic agent transformed from propofol, and has a similar sedative effect of propofol in previous study.
Whether ciprofol is safe and effective similar with propofol for sedation in ICU patients with mechanical ventilation? Therefor, a multi-center, double-blind, randomized control trial was conducted with a noninferiority design, to compared the rate of successful sedation without hypotension of sedation by ciprofol or propofol in ICU patients with mechanical ventilation.
A Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial will be launched to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol for sedation in ICU patients with mechanical ventilation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing Ciprofol and Propofol for Sedation in Hypotensive ICU Patients: a Single Center Prospective Cohort Study
NCT05971121
The Effect of Ciprofol on Breathing Patterns, Respiratory Drive, and Inspiratory Effort in Mechanically Ventilated Patients
NCT06287138
Ciprofol Versus Propofol for Tracheal Intubation in ICU
NCT06344949
Comparison of Ciprofol and Propofol Under IoC1 and IoC2 Monitoring for Adenotonsillectomy
NCT06882980
Ciprofol Versus Propofol for Anesthesia Induction in Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Double-blind Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT06312345
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ciprofol
Sedation with Ciprofol
During the drug administration period, ciprofol were IV infused at loading doses of 0.1 mg/kg, respectively, over 4 minutes ± 30 seconds depending on the physical condition of each patient. Ciprofol were then immediately administered at an initial maintenance dose of 0.3 mg/kg/hr, with a target sedation depth of RASS +1 to -2, based on the Pain, Agitation/sedation, Delirium, Immobility (rehabilitation/mobilization), and Sleep (disruption) guideline.
Propofol
Sedation with Propofol
During the drug administration period, propofol were IV infused at loading doses of 0.5 mg/kg, respectively, over 4 minutes ± 30 seconds depending on the physical condition of each patient. Propofol were then immediately administered at an initial maintenance dose of 1.5 mg/kg/hr, with a target sedation depth of RASS +1 to -2, based on the Pain, Agitation/sedation, Delirium, Immobility (rehabilitation/mobilization), and Sleep (disruption) guideline.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sedation with Ciprofol
During the drug administration period, ciprofol were IV infused at loading doses of 0.1 mg/kg, respectively, over 4 minutes ± 30 seconds depending on the physical condition of each patient. Ciprofol were then immediately administered at an initial maintenance dose of 0.3 mg/kg/hr, with a target sedation depth of RASS +1 to -2, based on the Pain, Agitation/sedation, Delirium, Immobility (rehabilitation/mobilization), and Sleep (disruption) guideline.
Sedation with Propofol
During the drug administration period, propofol were IV infused at loading doses of 0.5 mg/kg, respectively, over 4 minutes ± 30 seconds depending on the physical condition of each patient. Propofol were then immediately administered at an initial maintenance dose of 1.5 mg/kg/hr, with a target sedation depth of RASS +1 to -2, based on the Pain, Agitation/sedation, Delirium, Immobility (rehabilitation/mobilization), and Sleep (disruption) guideline.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years old, with no gender requirement;
3. The patients or their family members fully understood the objectives and significance of this study and voluntarily participated and signed informed consent forms.
Exclusion Criteria
4\. Patients have the following medical history or evidence of any of the following conditions at screening, which may increase the sedation/anesthesia risk:
1. Cardiovascular system: New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III and IV heart failure, Adams-stokes syndrome; patients who required vasopressor (equivalent norepinephrine ≥ 1μg/kg/min) to maintain a normal blood pressure.
2. Patients with hepatic and renal failure (liver function: refer to Child-Pugh grade C; renal function: eGFR ≤ 30 mL/(min·1.73 m2) \[eGFR was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation: eGFR = 175 × serum creatinine (SCr) - 1.234 × age - 0.179 × 0.79 (females)\]; patients undergoing dialysis.
3. Patients with grand mal epilepsy and convulsion; a Glasgow coma scale (GCS) ≤ 12 points.
5\. Patients with an expected survival of ≤ 24 h. 6. Pregnant or lactating females. 7. Patients participated in other drug clinical trials before screening. 8. Other conditions that patients were judged by the investigator to be unsuitable for inclusion in the study.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medicial University
OTHER
First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
OTHER
Zhongnan University Xiangya Second Hospital
UNKNOWN
Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
OTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou Medical College
OTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
OTHER
The Third Bethune Hospital of Jilin University
UNKNOWN
Zhongnan Hospital
OTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China (Anhui Provincial Hospital)
UNKNOWN
First Affiliated Hospital of the Xi'an Jiaotong University
UNKNOWN
First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University
OTHER
Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences
OTHER
Anhui provincial chest hospital
UNKNOWN
The Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region People's Hospital
UNKNOWN
Second Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University
OTHER
The Ninth People's Hospital of Suzhou
UNKNOWN
Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University
OTHER
Xuzhou Medical University Hospital
UNKNOWN
First People's Hospital of Hangzhou
OTHER
Hebei Medical University Fourth Hospital
OTHER
Huai'an First People's Hospital
OTHER
Jinan City People's Hospital
UNKNOWN
The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang
OTHER
Jiangsu Subei People's Hospital
UNKNOWN
Suqian First Hospital
OTHER
Tai'an City Central Hospital
UNKNOWN
Xuzhou Central Hospital
OTHER
The first People's Hospital of Yancheng City
UNKNOWN
The First People's Hospital of Zunyi
OTHER
Jiangxi Provincial People's Hopital
OTHER
Henan Provincial People's Hospital
OTHER
Zhongda Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Fei Peng
Principal Investigator
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SAME study
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.