The Study of Ciprofol for the Suppression of Cardiovascular Responses to Tracheal Intubation

NCT ID: NCT06095570

Last Updated: 2023-10-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-07-23

Study Completion Date

2023-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Preliminary studies have illuminated the promising nature of ciprofol, indicating its enhanced safety spectrum, superior potency, and a diminished likelihood of experiencing injection-related discomfort. Venturing deeper, this research embarked on an ambitious quest to measure the 95% effective volume of ciprofol for induction of general anesthesia by a modified sequential method and juxtapose the 95% effective volume dosage of ciprofol against a corresponding dose of remimazolam during the initiation of general anesthesia. The study delved into diverse anesthetic protocols, meticulously scrutinizing the safety and efficacy credentials of ciprofol. The ultimate vision was to pave a robust foundation for the sophisticated and judicious utilization of ciprofol in clinical landscapes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

During general anesthesia induction, tracheal intubation is a significant procedure that can cause cardiovascular fluctuations due to the stimulation of tracheal receptors. This can lead to complications such as imbalances in vital organ oxygen supply, especially in patients with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disorders, potentially resulting in cardiac arrest. As the demand for anesthetics rises in clinical settings, some, due to extreme side effects, have been phased out, reducing the available options.

Propofol, a common anesthetic, is effective and quick but has drawbacks like injection pain and risks associated with long-term use. In contrast, ciprofol, a new class I intravenous anesthetic, is emerging as a potentially better alternative. Early research indicates that ciprofol might have a broader safety margin than propofol and offers benefits like rapid recovery and lower chances of injection pain.

Exhaustive studies on the precise dosage of ciprofol for surgical applications are scarce and comparisons between ciprofol and remimazolam are rarely reported in the literature. This research aims to bridge this knowledge gap, exploring the best dosage for tracheal intubation sedation, and ensuring patients get the most effective and safest anesthetic care.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intubation, Intratracheal Adverse Effects

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Group C: Ciprofol + sufentanil + rocuronium bromide Group R: Remimazolam+ sufentanil + rocuronium bromide
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
People who were unaware of the experiment helped to randomize the groups and inject the test drug according to the groups, and the patients who participated in the experiment as well as the doctors were unaware of the groups.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group C

Ciprofol + sufentanil + rocuronium bromide

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ciprofol

Intervention Type DRUG

For induction of anesthesia, an experimental dose of ciprofol was given, and when the patient lost consciousness and the Modified Observer's Alertness/Sedation scale(MOAA/S score) was less than 1, then intravenous sufentanil and rocuronium bromide were administered, and tracheal intubation was performed 3 minutes later

Group R

Remimazolam+ sufentanil + rocuronium bromide

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Remimazolam

Intervention Type DRUG

For induction of anesthesia, an experimental dose of remimazolam was given, and when the patient lost consciousness and the Modified Observer's Alertness/Sedation scale(MOAA/S score) was less than 1, then intravenous sufentanil and rocuronium bromide were administered, and tracheal intubation was performed 3 minutes later

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ciprofol

For induction of anesthesia, an experimental dose of ciprofol was given, and when the patient lost consciousness and the Modified Observer's Alertness/Sedation scale(MOAA/S score) was less than 1, then intravenous sufentanil and rocuronium bromide were administered, and tracheal intubation was performed 3 minutes later

Intervention Type DRUG

Remimazolam

For induction of anesthesia, an experimental dose of remimazolam was given, and when the patient lost consciousness and the Modified Observer's Alertness/Sedation scale(MOAA/S score) was less than 1, then intravenous sufentanil and rocuronium bromide were administered, and tracheal intubation was performed 3 minutes later

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Ciprofol injection Remimazolam Tosylate for Injection

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients undergoing surgery with a single-lumen endotracheal tube placed under general anesthesia;
2. American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA grade) I or II;
3. Age 18\~65 years old;
4. Body mass index (BMI) 18 to 28 kg/m2;
5. Mallampati airway classification grade I or II;
6. Acceptance of this experiment and signing of informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with a history of alcoholism, allergy to any component of the product;
2. Patients with severe heart, lung and brain vital organ diseases, such as acute heart attack, cerebral infarction, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and other medical history;
3. Serious liver and kidney function abnormalities or combined serious endocrine dysfunction, such as hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥ 160 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mmHg, HR ≥ 110 beats/min), diabetes mellitus, hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism and so on;
4. Difficult airway (mouth opening less than 3 cross fingers, those with Mallampati score grade III or IV, difficulty in vocal valve exposure, difficulty in tracheal intubation, unsuccessful in one attempt); oropharyngeal and cervical deformities or history of previous tracheotomy;
5. Neuropsychiatric abnormalities, communication and comprehension deficits exist;
6. History of long-term sedative and analgesic medications, drug and opioid addiction, and heart rate control medications (e.g., beta blockers, alpha agonists, calcium channel blockers); and
7. Pregnancy.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hu Sun

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Hai Kou, China

Min Liao

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Hai Kou, China

Xiaoru Wu

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Hai Kou, China

Jianing Hu

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Hai Kou, China

Xingzhou Lin

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Hai Kou, China

Tangyuanmeng Zhao

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

West China Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Hai Kou, China

Haikou, Hainan, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Hu Sun

Role: CONTACT

13617518996

Min Liao

Role: CONTACT

13364015074

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

min liao, Master

Role: primary

13364015074

hu sun, Master

Role: backup

+86 136 1751 8996

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

El-Shmaa NS, El-Baradey GF. The efficacy of labetalol vs dexmedetomidine for attenuation of hemodynamic stress response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Jun;31:267-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.01.037. Epub 2016 Apr 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27185725 (View on PubMed)

Kayhan Z, Aldemir D, Mutlu H, Ogus E. Which is responsible for the haemodynamic response due to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation? Catecholamines, vasopressin or angiotensin? Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005 Oct;22(10):780-5. doi: 10.1017/s0265021505001298.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16211744 (View on PubMed)

Higgs A, McGrath BA, Goddard C, Rangasami J, Suntharalingam G, Gale R, Cook TM; Difficult Airway Society; Intensive Care Society; Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine; Royal College of Anaesthetists. Guidelines for the management of tracheal intubation in critically ill adults. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Feb;120(2):323-352. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.10.021. Epub 2017 Nov 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29406182 (View on PubMed)

Xue FS, Xu YC, Liu Y, Yang QY, Liao X, Liu HP, Zhang YM, Liu JH, Luo MP. Different small-dose sufentanil blunting cardiovascular responses to laryngoscopy and intubation in children: a randomized, double-blind comparison. Br J Anaesth. 2008 May;100(5):717-23. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen032. Epub 2008 Mar 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18325887 (View on PubMed)

Weisenberg M, Sessler DI, Tavdi M, Gleb M, Ezri T, Dalton JE, Protianov M, Zimlichmann R. Dose-dependent hemodynamic effects of propofol induction following brotizolam premedication in hypertensive patients taking angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. J Clin Anesth. 2010 May;22(3):190-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2009.07.008.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20400005 (View on PubMed)

Sneyd JR, Absalom AR, Barends CRM, Jones JB. Hypotension during propofol sedation for colonoscopy: a retrospective exploratory analysis and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2022 Apr;128(4):610-622. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.10.044. Epub 2021 Dec 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34916051 (View on PubMed)

Hemphill S, McMenamin L, Bellamy MC, Hopkins PM. Propofol infusion syndrome: a structured literature review and analysis of published case reports. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;122(4):448-459. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.12.025. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30857601 (View on PubMed)

Qin L, Ren L, Wan S, Liu G, Luo X, Liu Z, Li F, Yu Y, Liu J, Wei Y. Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Novel 2,6-Disubstituted Phenol Derivatives as General Anesthetics. J Med Chem. 2017 May 11;60(9):3606-3617. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00254. Epub 2017 Apr 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28430430 (View on PubMed)

Bian Y, Zhang H, Ma S, Jiao Y, Yan P, Liu X, Ma S, Xiong Y, Gu Z, Yu Z, Huang C, Miao L. Mass balance, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous HSK3486, a novel anaesthetic, administered to healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Jan;87(1):93-105. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14363. Epub 2020 Aug 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32415708 (View on PubMed)

Liao M, Wu XR, Hu JN, Lin XZ, Zhao TY, Sun H. Comparative effective dose of ciprofol and propofol in suppressing cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation. Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 13;15(1):1822. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85968-2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39805976 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RM20220701

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.