The Performance of Posterior Partial Coverage Coronal Restorations Luted With Two Differrent Systems.
NCT ID: NCT06457737
Last Updated: 2025-03-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-05-01
2026-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The null hypothesis:
The use of preheated resin composite for cementing partial coverage restoration will not result in significantly superior clinical performance when compared to that after using dual-cure resin cement.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Color Stability and Wear Resistance of Direct Flowable and Preheated Composite Using the Injectable Technique
NCT06532916
Assessment Of Inlay Retained Bridge Designs In Missing Posterior Teeth Cases. (Randomized Clinical Trial)
NCT03139396
Post-retained Restorations for RPD Abutments
NCT03466437
Clinical Evaluation of Indirect Tooth-Colored Onlays With Cervical Margin Relocation
NCT07157410
Prosthetic Outcomes and Clinical Performance of Implant Supported Zirconia Crowns
NCT06417632
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study explores an alternative approach using a pre-heated restorative resin composite as a luting material of partial coverage restorations on upper and lower posterior teeth, aiming to address these drawbacks. It will follow a split-mouth design with 60 participants selected based on strict criteria. The preparation and delivery appointments follow specific guidelines, incorporating the Morphology Driven Preparation Technique (MDPT). Assessment at 6 months and 1 year post-delivery utilizes a modified model of USPHS criteria, evaluating retention, color match, marginal discoloration, secondary caries, anatomical form, marginal adaptation, and surface roughness.
The objectives of this clinical trial are to evaluate the clinical performance of posterior partial coverage coronal restorations utilizing two different luting systems (preheated resin-based composite versus conventional dual-cure resin cement) in a split-mouth study design.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Preheated resin composite (IPS Empress Direct) group
Endodontically treated teeth will be prepared to receive partial coverage ceramic restorations that will be luted with preheated composite.
IPS Empress Direct
Resin composite will be heated and used to lute a ceramic partial coverage restoration.
Dual-cure adhesive resin cement (Bisco Duo-Link Universal) group
Endodontically treated teeth will be prepared to receive partial coverage ceramic restorations that will be luted with dual-cure adhesive resin cement.
Bisco Duo-Link Universal
Dual cure adhesive resin cement will be used to lute a ceramic partial coverage restoration.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
IPS Empress Direct
Resin composite will be heated and used to lute a ceramic partial coverage restoration.
Bisco Duo-Link Universal
Dual cure adhesive resin cement will be used to lute a ceramic partial coverage restoration.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Individuals aged 18 years and above with no systemic diseases that will affect their participation.
* Teeth of healthy periodontium.
* Teeth to be restored in normal occlusion with natural antagonist and adjacent teeth.
* Acceptable oral hygiene characterized by no gingivitis, calculus deposit or active carious lesions.
* Non-vital teeth will be included
Exclusion Criteria
* Profound, chronic periodontitis
* Poor oral hygiene.
* Sustained dentin hypersensitivity.
* Systemic disease or severe medical complications or taking anti-inflammatory, analgesic, or psychotropic drugs.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
King Abdullah University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Zakereyya SM Albashaireh, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Jordan University of Science and Technology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Jordan University of Science and Technology
Irbid, , Jordan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Veneziani M. Posterior indirect adhesive restorations: updated indications and the Morphology Driven Preparation Technique. Int J Esthet Dent. 2017;12(2):204-230.
Rickman LJ, Padipatvuthikul P, Chee B. Clinical applications of preheated hybrid resin composite. Br Dent J. 2011 Jul 22;211(2):63-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.571.
Ayub KV, Santos GC Jr, Rizkalla AS, Bohay R, Pegoraro LF, Rubo JH, Santos MJ. Effect of preheating on microhardness and viscosity of 4 resin composites. J Can Dent Assoc. 2014;80:e12.
Mundim FM, Garcia Lda F, Cruvinel DR, Lima FA, Bachmann L, Pires-de-Souza Fde C. Color stability, opacity and degree of conversion of pre-heated composites. J Dent. 2011 Jul;39 Suppl 1:e25-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.12.001. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
da Costa JB, Hilton TJ, Swift EJ Jr. Critical appraisal: preheating composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011 Aug;23(4):269-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00461.x. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
Marcondes RL, Lima VP, Barbon FJ, Isolan CP, Carvalho MA, Salvador MV, Lima AF, Moraes RR. Viscosity and thermal kinetics of 10 preheated restorative resin composites and effect of ultrasound energy on film thickness. Dent Mater. 2020 Oct;36(10):1356-1364. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
Patussi AFC, Ramacciato JC, da Silva JGR, Nascimento VRP, Campos DES, de Araujo Ferreira Munizz I, de Souza GM, Lima RBW. Preheating of dental composite resins: A scoping review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023 Jun;35(4):646-656. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12991. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
Magne P, Razaghy M, Carvalho MA, Soares LM. Luting of inlays, onlays, and overlays with preheated restorative composite resin does not prevent seating accuracy. Int J Esthet Dent. 2018;13(3):318-332.
Coelho NF, Barbon FJ, Machado RG, Boscato N, Moraes RR. Response of composite resins to preheating and the resulting strengthening of luted feldspar ceramic. Dent Mater. 2019 Oct;35(10):1430-1438. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.07.021. Epub 2019 Aug 3.
Gresnigt MMM, Ozcan M, Carvalho M, Lazari P, Cune MS, Razavi P, Magne P. Effect of luting agent on the load to failure and accelerated-fatigue resistance of lithium disilicate laminate veneers. Dent Mater. 2017 Dec;33(12):1392-1401. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
Skapska A, Komorek Z, Cierech M, Mierzwinska-Nastalska E. Comparison of Mechanical Properties of a Self-Adhesive Composite Cement and a Heated Composite Material. Polymers (Basel). 2022 Jun 30;14(13):2686. doi: 10.3390/polym14132686.
Falacho RI, Marques JA, Palma PJ, Roseiro L, Caramelo F, Ramos JC, Guerra F, Blatz MB. Luting indirect restorations with resin cements versus composite resins: Effects of preheating and ultrasound energy on film thickness. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022 Jun;34(4):641-649. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12851. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
Goujat A, Abouelleil H, Colon P, Jeannin C, Pradelle N, Seux D, Grosgogeat B. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM inlay/onlay restorations: A systematic review of in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Apr;121(4):590-597.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
Schmidlin PR, Zehnder M, Schlup-Mityko C, Gohring TN. Interface evaluation after manual and ultrasonic insertion of standardized class I inlays using composite resin materials of different viscosity. Acta Odontol Scand. 2005 Aug;63(4):205-12. doi: 10.1080/00016350510019973.
Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing: a fundamental procedure for indirect bonded restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2005;17(3):144-54; discussion 155. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2005.tb00103.x.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
ISO-4049:2019 standard: The polymer-based luting materials covered by this document are intended for use in the cementation or fixation of restorations and appliances such as inlays, onlays, veneers, crowns and bridges.
Sealed Envelope Ltd. 2012. Power calculator for binary outcome superiority trial. \[Online\]
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20240137
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.