Comparison Between Conventional and Digital Workflow in Dental Prosthesis
NCT ID: NCT06215781
Last Updated: 2024-01-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-01-07
2023-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* fully digital workflow
* combined digital and conventional workflow
* fully conventional workflow For each patients were evaluated the interproximal (IC) and occlusal contact (OC) and impression time (IT) and the patient satisfaction through a VAS scale.
The null hypothesis is that are no differences between the three groups for each parameter.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Full-Digital Workflow in Single-Tooth Implant Rehabilitation
NCT05011604
The Use of a Fully Digital Workflow in Immediate Implants With Immediate Restoration
NCT07294820
Complete Digital Workflow
NCT07091786
Passive Fit of Implant-Supported Complete-Arch Prostheses Using Digital Workflows
NCT07315620
Digital vs Conventional Prosthetic Rehab & Occlusal Analysis in Edentulous Patients
NCT07164066
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Inclusion criteria were good oral health, absence of parafunction, no dental caries or presence of periodontitis, and healthy general conditions.
Exclusion criteria were bad oral health, parafunctions, dental caries or periodontitis, and general health comorbidities that don't allow surgical treatment.
The 60 patients are divided into three groups:
* fully digital workflow: each patient in this group was treated with an exclusively digital workflow, from digital planning of the surgical phase to digital impression and digital manufacturing of prosthetic crowns.
* combined digital and conventional workflow: each patient of this group was subjected to digital planning, and then, the impressions were taken with traditional analogical materials, so the plaster model was converted into a digital model, and there finally was performed a digital manufacturing of prosthetic crown.
* entirely conventional workflow: each patient was treated with an analogical technique. No digital phase was performed.
After prosthetic delivery, each patient were evaluated for interproximal (IC) and occlusal contact (OC), impression time (IT), and patient satisfaction through a VAS scale.
The null hypothesis is that there are no significant differences between the three groups.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Fully digital workflow
Patients of this group are subjected to entire digital workflow, from the digital planning to the delivery of definitive zirconia fixed dental prosthesis
Fully digital workflow of prosthetic fixed dental crown
The intervention that was administered was a full digital workflow. It includes an initial digital planning, an optical impression with intraoral scanner and a CAD-CAM milled zirconia crown. No analog materials were used.
Combined digital-conventional workflows
Patients of this group were subjected to every digital steps as the "fully digital workflow" arm, except for the impression that includes analog material (silicones).
Combined digital and conventional workflows of prosthetic fixed dental crown
The intervention that was administered was a combined digital and traditional workflow. The initial planning was digital, then the impression was performed with analog impression material (silicones) and the final zirconia crown was CAD-CAM milled, with a digital procedure.
Fully conventional workflow
Patients of this group follow the entire analog protocol. All the procedures exclude digital involvement.
Fully conventional workflow of prosthetic fixed dental crown
The intervention that was administered was a conventional workflow that doesn't provide any digital step. The impression was taken with analog material (silicones) and the final prosthesis was a metal-ceramic crown, realized on plaster cast.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fully digital workflow of prosthetic fixed dental crown
The intervention that was administered was a full digital workflow. It includes an initial digital planning, an optical impression with intraoral scanner and a CAD-CAM milled zirconia crown. No analog materials were used.
Combined digital and conventional workflows of prosthetic fixed dental crown
The intervention that was administered was a combined digital and traditional workflow. The initial planning was digital, then the impression was performed with analog impression material (silicones) and the final zirconia crown was CAD-CAM milled, with a digital procedure.
Fully conventional workflow of prosthetic fixed dental crown
The intervention that was administered was a conventional workflow that doesn't provide any digital step. The impression was taken with analog material (silicones) and the final prosthesis was a metal-ceramic crown, realized on plaster cast.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* good general health conditions
* no contraindication to oral surgery and fixed prosthesis
* patients who completed the 6 months follow-up
Exclusion Criteria
* bad general health conditions (with multi-drug therapy)
* periodontitis or dental caries susceptibly
* parafunctions presence
* TMJ disorders
* didn't accept the informed consent / treatment planning
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Massimo Corsalini
Prof
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Massimo Corsalini, Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro"
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Massimo Corsalini
Bari, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UOC Odontostomatologia
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.