Implementation of Digital Workflow for Complete Dentures - A Crossover Study
NCT ID: NCT06457321
Last Updated: 2025-06-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-10-30
2027-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Smart Digital Workflow Towards High Precision and Through-Put Production for Removable Partial Dentures
NCT06273449
Assessment of Wear and Muscular Efficiency of 3D Printed Versus Conventional Denture Teeth: A Cross-Over In Vivo Study
NCT07035574
Application of 3D Printed Removable Denture Prosthesis Framework for Partial Edentulous Patients
NCT04304222
Comparison Between Conventional and Digital Workflow in Dental Prosthesis
NCT06215781
Conventionally vs. Digitally Fabricated Complete Dentures: Clinical Treatment Outcome Differences
NCT02521935
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This proposal aims to 1) to evaluate the cost and time used with both digital and conventional workflows; 2) to compare clinical outcomes between digital and conventional dentures; 3) to evaluate patients' satisfaction toward the digital dentures.
The long-term goal of this study is to reduce treatment cost and time, improve service efficiency and eventually enhance oral function and overall quality of life of complete edentulous patients.
Participants will be randomized into 2 groups to determine the sequence of the workflow:
Group 1: Conventional then partial digital Group 2: Partial digital than conventional
For conventional method
1.1 Clinical Examination
Informed consent will be obtained when patients attend the first visit for examination and diagnosis. Detailed examination of the oral mucosa and alveolar ridge will be carried out during the initial visit.
For conventional workflow, primary impressions using alginate impression material will be made with a stock tray for both maxillary and mandibular arches. This impression will be poured as a preliminary stone cast for fabrication of a PMMA resin custom impression tray in a conventional dental laboratory.
Participant will also be asked to complete questionnaires to rate their current denture:
During Fabrication (Visit 1-4)
* 3D Denture Patient Questionnaire OHIP EN (Pre-issue)
* 3D Denture Patient Questionnaire VAS
1.2 Master Impression
The customized special tray will be checked in patient mouth for fit and extension followed by border moulding using low fusing impression compound. Master impressions will be taken using special trays and zinc oxide impression paste or silicone materials. Stone casts will be created using green stone in the dental laboratory. The wax base will be constructed on the master models and wax rim will be added.
1.3 Jaw Relation Registration
Adjustment of wax rim will be made by clinicians to determine the vertical jaw relation, occlusal plane, and lip support. The size and shade of the teeth will be selected. The models will be mounted in the laboratory and teeth set up will be completed.
1.4 Aesthetic Try-in
The anterior and posterior teeth setup will be verified intraorally in patient. Maxillary and mandible relation will be confirmed. The articulator will be returned to the lab technician for finishing. The final dentures will be fabricated using the polymerizing polymethylmethacrylate resin, trimmed and polished by the dental technician.
1.5 Issue of denture
Necessary adjustments may be made by clinicians to meet the retention, stability and support requirements. The finished complete dentures will be evaluated in the patient mouth. Patients will be invited to fill in the questionnaire to report on oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL) and chewing ability based on the usage of patients' existing dentures.
1.6 Follow-up visits
Patients will be followed up two times at 2 weeks and 4 weeks after dentures are issued. Necessary modifications to the dentures will be made to ensure the comfort and function of the devices. Patients' oral health related quality of life and general satisfaction with the complete dentures, including aesthetics, retention, speech, chewing and comfort will be assessed using a self-administered questionnaire .
For partial digital method
2.1 \[Clinic\] Informed consent will be obtained when the patients attend their first visit for examination and diagnosis upon being called. Detailed examination of the oral mucosa and alveolar ridge will be carried out in the initial visit. Like the conventional workflow, primary impressions with an alginate impression material will be used with a stock tray for both maxillary and mandibular arches. This impression will be used to pour a preliminary stone cast.
\[Lab\] The preliminary stone cast will be thereafter scanned digitally using a lab scanner. Design of special tray will be carried out on the computer programme and 3D printing of PMMA resin custom impression tray will be conducted using a resin printer. A wax rim can then be conventionally added on top of this resin tray for the next visit.
2.2 Master Impression + Maxillomandibular Registration
\[Clinic\]The customized special tray will be checked in patient mouth for fit and extension followed by border moulding using low fusing impression compound. Master impressions will be taken using special trays and an addition polymerization silicone material. The OVD and maxillomandibular relationship will also be recorded using the wax rims and bite registration material during this visit.
\[Lab\] The master impression on the intaglio surface and registered wax rim will be scanned using an intra-oral scanner. Subsequently, the digital set-up of the denture teeth will be done. This preliminary teeth set up is then printed in resin for a try in during the next visit.
2.3. Aesthetic Try-in
\[Clinic\] The anterior and posterior teeth setup will be verified intraorally in patient. Maxillomandibular relationship and aesthetics relation will be verified. If changes are required, clinicians will be able to trim the resin teeth and base to achieve adequate maxillary and mandible relationship.
\[Lab\] The eventual verified MMR relationship will be scanned again. Adjustments to the digital teeth set up can be adjusted where necessary. The final dentures will be printed using the polymerizing polymethylmethacrylate resin, trimmed and polished by the dental technician.
2.4 Issue of denture
Necessary adjustments may be made by clinicians to meet the retention, stability and support requirements. The finished complete dentures will be evaluated in the patient mouth. Patients will be invited to fill in the questionnaire to report on oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL) and chewing ability based on the usage of patients' existing dentures.
2.5 Follow-up visits
Patients will be followed up two times at 2 weeks and 4 weeks after dentures are issued. Necessary modifications to the dentures will be made to ensure the comfort and function of the devices. Patients' oral health related quality of life and general satisfaction with the complete dentures, including aesthetics, retention, speech, chewing and comfort will be assessed using a self-administered questionnaire .
Sequence of issue
The patients will be randomised into 2 groups, determining the sequence in which the 2 sets of dentures from both workflows will be issued. The initial denture treatment stages from both workflows will be done concurrently. However, depending on which group they have been randomised into, they will be issued the conventional of the partial digital denture first.
After reviewing the patient thrice (at 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 2 months) for adjustments where necessary, the second set of denture from the other workflow will be issued and reviewed at the same time intervals. This allows ample time for the patient to test out and adapt to each set of denture from both workflows.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
Group 1: Participants receive denture made from Conventional method, followed by denture made from partial digital method Group 2: Participants receive denture made from partial digital method, followed by denture made from conventional method
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Receive conventionally made denture first then denture made from partial digital method.
Participants will be receiving their Denture 1 made from conventional method first and provide feedback at the 1-month and 2-month Denture 1 post-issue review visits.
Participants will then return the Denture 1 to the attending clinician and receive the Denture 2 made from partial digital method and provide feedback at the 1-month and 2-month post-issue Denture 2 review visits.
Sequence in receiving the fabricated dentures made using the conventional and partial digital method
Participants is not informed on the sequence they have been randomized hence they are not able to determine which denture is fabricated from which method. This would reduce bias when collecting the participants' responses in the satisfaction questionnaire during the review visits.
Receive denture made from partial digital method first then conventionally made denture.
Participants will be receiving their Denture 1 made from partial digital method first and provide feedback at the 1-month and 2-month Denture 1 post-issue review visits.
Participants will then return the Denture 1 to the attending clinician and receive the Denture 2 made from conventional method and provide feedback at the 1-month and 2-month post-issue Denture 2 review visits.
Sequence in receiving the fabricated dentures made using the conventional and partial digital method
Participants is not informed on the sequence they have been randomized hence they are not able to determine which denture is fabricated from which method. This would reduce bias when collecting the participants' responses in the satisfaction questionnaire during the review visits.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sequence in receiving the fabricated dentures made using the conventional and partial digital method
Participants is not informed on the sequence they have been randomized hence they are not able to determine which denture is fabricated from which method. This would reduce bias when collecting the participants' responses in the satisfaction questionnaire during the review visits.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Prior denture experience.
* Above the age of 21 years.
* Medically fit (ASA classification of physical status I-III);
* Able to write/read English or Chinese well.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients require surgical interventions to correct ridge anatomy.
* Patients with a history of maladaptation to denture use.
* Patients with maxillofacial defects.
* Patients unable to response to the English/Chinese questionnaires.
* Patients with enlarged tuberosity, minimal bone resorption resulting in limited restorative space
* Patients with enlarged tori
* Patients with flabby ridge
* Patients with severely resorbed ridges
* Patients with severe skeletal relationship discrepancy
21 Years
99 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Dental Centre, Singapore
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
370-2022
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.