Digital vs Analog Impression in Cases of All-on-4 - Prosthesis
NCT ID: NCT04475913
Last Updated: 2021-03-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
56 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-07-11
2020-08-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
All participants received hybrid dentures. Bone loss, implant loss, maintenance of prosthesis were evaluated at 6m,12m, and 24 months follow up period.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Three-dimensional Accuracy of Direct Digital Scanning for All on Four Implants in Comparison to a Custom-made Verification Jig in Fully Edentulous Patients
NCT07106177
Trueness of Full Arch Scans and Generated Digital Implant Models
NCT06281002
The Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Implant Impression Techniques
NCT04908618
Digital Intraoral Scanning With and Without Prefabricated Landmarks Versus Conventional Impression Technique
NCT06592066
Digital Versus Conventional Impression CAD\CAM Constructed 4- Implant Supported Mandibular Overdenture Base
NCT06071676
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
(CIG Axial)
received 4 axial implants and conventional impression
DIG Axial
patients received 4 axial implants and digital impression
(DIG Axial)
received 4 axial implants and digital impression
DIG Tilted
received two anterior axial implants and two distal tilted implants, and digital impression
CIG Axial
patients received 4 axial implants and conventional impression
CIG Tilted
received two anterior axial implants and two distal tilted implants, and conventional impression
DIG Tilted
received two anterior axial implants and two distal tilted implants, and digital impression
(DIG Tilted)
received two anterior axial implants and two distal tilted implants, and digital impression
DIG Axial
patients received 4 axial implants and digital impression
CIG Tilted
received two anterior axial implants and two distal tilted implants, and conventional impression
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
DIG Axial
patients received 4 axial implants and digital impression
DIG Tilted
received two anterior axial implants and two distal tilted implants, and digital impression
CIG Axial
patients received 4 axial implants and conventional impression
CIG Tilted
received two anterior axial implants and two distal tilted implants, and conventional impression
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* physically and psychologically eligible participants for implants placement.
* adequate bone to receive 4 interforaminal implants.
Exclusion Criteria
* medical conditions that precludes implants placement
* smokers
* patients suffering from any parafunctional habits
50 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
October University for Modern Sciences and Arts
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dina Elawady
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Lecturer
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
OctoberUMSA
Giza, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
5
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.