Milled Versus Printed CAD/CAM Complete Dentures

NCT ID: NCT04873219

Last Updated: 2025-03-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

15 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-09-15

Study Completion Date

2020-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A crossover clinical trial investigates two novel CAD/CAM techniques for complete removable dental prostheses for edentulous patients, milling and rapid prototyping (3D-printing) in a clinical setting of an undergraduate student clinic. Outcome parameters concern the dentures' trueness, retention, stability, esthetics and occlusion. Secondary outcome parameters include willingness to pay and prosthetic maintenance need.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The process of fabricating complete removable dental prostheses (CRDPs) by novel CAD/CAM manufacturing technique has in the recent years gained immense popularity with clinicians as well as dental technicians worldwide. CRDPs can be manufactured by a subtractive process (milling technique) or by an additive process (rapid prototyping or 3D printing). The milling technique is the frequently employed technique for fabricating CRDPs; it is well documented in terms of precision, material properties, and a few clinical trials have even demonstrated good patient and clinician satisfaction. The rapid prototyping (3D printing) method however, is still in the developing stages for this particular application. Although both methods seem to yield clinically acceptable results, there are no studies in current literature which compare the CRDPs manufactured by the two CAD/CAM methods.

The proposed single-center, double-blind, randomized crossover clinical trial specifically aims to test the following hypothesis that:

• there is no difference between the two types of CRDPs (milled, and rapidly prototyped) in terms of trueness, denture quality, patient satisfaction, prosthodontic maintenance and adjustments requirements and incurred costs.

Fifteen pre-doctoral final year dental students and their respective completely edentulous patients will be recruited in this RCT. A traditional clinical complete denture protocol will be followed to record the clinical steps. Two sets of CRDPs will be manufactured (CAD/CAM milling and 3D printing). The CRDPs will be randomized before denture insertion and then delivered to the patient. Each CRDPs will be worn by the patient for a period of 6 weeks, before crossing over. Clinical examinations and data collection will be performed at baseline (T0), at denture insertion stage (T1), and at the end of 6 weeks (T2) for each of the investigated CRDPs. Assessments will comprise of comparison of trueness of denture intaglio surfaces against the corresponding master cast, denture quality assessments, patient satisfaction scores, prosthodontic maintenance needs and willingness-to-pay analysis and cost minimization analysis.

This RCT will contribute significantly in the development of CAD/CAM treatment concepts for fabricating complete removable dental prostheses (CRDPs). The study would highlight the differences, if any, between the two manufacturing methods for CRDPs, in terms of trueness, quality of the prostheses, clinician and patient satisfaction and also incurred costs. Clinically, the planned RCT hopes to demonstrate the feasibility of these novel treatment concepts in frail elderly edentates. A significant reduction in the treatment times, maintenance visits, and costs along with high patient satisfaction with these newer CRDPs would be added advantages when treating the elderly edentates.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Denture, Complete Jaw, Edentulous

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

double blind single center cross-over design
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators
neither the patients, nor the operator knew which type of denture was inserted

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CAD/CAM milled complete denture

the dentures were milled out of a block of pre-polymerized PMMA resin (Avadent, Global dental Science, Netherlands)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

manufacturing a complete dental prosthesis

Intervention Type DEVICE

dental treatment to replace missing teeth

CAD/CAM rapid prototyped complete denture

the dentures will be 3D-printed from a liquid PMMA, including the teeth (NexDent, Netherlands)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

manufacturing a complete dental prosthesis

Intervention Type DEVICE

dental treatment to replace missing teeth

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

manufacturing a complete dental prosthesis

dental treatment to replace missing teeth

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

complete denture manufacturing

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patient of undergraduate student at the University clinics of dental medicine Geneva
* completely edentulous
* requesting novel complete dentures

Exclusion Criteria

* not willing to sign informed consent
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Geneva, Switzerland

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Frauke Müller

Prof Dr med dent Dr hc Frauke Müller

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Frauke Mueller, Prof Dr Dr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

clinique universitaire de médecine dentaire

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University clinics of dental medicine

Geneva, Canton of Geneva, Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MDGPA_03

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.