Retention and Durability of the Anterior Zirconia Wing Bridge
NCT ID: NCT04378140
Last Updated: 2024-04-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
8 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-05-05
2030-12-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Twelve patients will have bridges placed and be evaluated every 6 months (ideally) to determine if the bridge is staying in place (retention) and if it is resistant to fracture (durability).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prosthetic Outcomes and Clinical Performance of Implant Supported Zirconia Crowns
NCT06417632
Single-retainer Lithium Di-silicate Versus Zirconia Resin Bonded Bridge for Replacement of an Anterior Missing Tooth.
NCT05861921
Assessment Of Inlay Retained Bridge Designs In Missing Posterior Teeth Cases. (Randomized Clinical Trial)
NCT03139396
Esthetic, Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Immediately Placed Implants (Type 1) and Early Placed Implants (Type 2)
NCT01623739
The Clinical Performance of Inlay Zirconia Bridges
NCT02995876
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Decades ago, the option for a conservative bridge was primarily found in the Maryland bridge, which had two metal wings that were cemented or bonded on to two abutments. Though conservative, the Maryland Bridge did not enjoy a high reputation because of the high rate of debonding (falling off).
In the last several decades, the use of zirconia as a restorative material in dentistry has dramatically risen due to its toughness, resemblance in color to natural teeth, and affordability. Also, composite resin bonding agents (adhesive for dental fillings) have increased in strength and effectiveness. With these two advancements, the possibility of overcoming the some of the previous shortcomings with the Maryland Bridge is more of a reality.
The type of zirconia-wing bridge we are researching in this study has two wings which generally have three countersunk holes (meaning that the circumference of the outer portion of the hole is larger than the inner part of the hole). Composite resin (dental filling material) is placed in the holes as well as under and around the wings.
In summary, the zirconia-wing bridge presents a desirable alternative to traditional options for missing anterior teeth. With the advancements in resin-bonding and zirconia, this study seeks to examine how these combined elements can be used in the zirconia-wing bridge to maximize durability and retention in clinical scenarios.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
zirconia wing bridge
The zirconia wing bridge consists of an artificial tooth made out of zirconia and porcelain on the front side with two zirconia wings that are bonded (glued) onto the back of the two adjacent teeth in the patient's mouth.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* One missing anterior tooth
* Adjacent teeth to the missing tooth must be non-restored or minimally-restored in with gums that have pockets of 4 millimeters or less
* Fluent in English or Spanish
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who are unable to attend 6-month recall appointments
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Roseman University of Health Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
David McMillan
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David G McMillan, DDS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Roseman University of Health Sciences
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Roseman University of Health Sciences
South Jordan, Utah, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1164902
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.