Clinical Evaluation of Teeth Prepared With Vertical Preparation Versus Deep Chamfer

NCT ID: NCT05252689

Last Updated: 2022-04-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-03-01

Study Completion Date

2021-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

It has been demonstrated that a great amount of tooth structure is lost during the prosthetic preparations of abutments for full-coverage FDPs with tooth substance removal of 63% of 73%, this aggressive loss of tooth structure usually accompanied with pain and post-operative sensitivity. In comparison with the vertical preparation technique, there is less amount of tooth substance loss. this clinical study will provide benefits for practitioners and clinicians by guiding them to choose a more conservative treatment plan with the better marginal fit, clinical performance and satisfaction for the patients on the long term. rather than other benefits like less chair time, less risk for pulp injury, less time and cost

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A healthy relationship between dental restorations and the periodontium is of prime importance for the clinical longevity and esthetic harmony of full coverage restorations . One of the Most Common complications, derived from fixed prostheses is gingival recession, which constitutes an important clinical concern. This problem is largely associated with iatrogenic effects produced during dental preparation or as a result of poor prosthetic fit which can cause chronic inflammation leading to gingival margin recession around the restoration .

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Single Posterior Crowns Endodontically Treated Teeth Decayed Teeth

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
double blind

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

monolithic zirconia single posterior crowns with deep chamfer finish line

monolithic zirconia single posterior crowns with deep chamfer finish line fabricated by cad cam machine and cemented by self adhesive resin cement.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

monolithic zirconia single posterior crowns with deep chamfer finish line

Intervention Type OTHER

deep chamfer of 1 mm average thickness for cervical finish line, a convergence angle of 6-12° on each side and up to 20° total, in some studies, is acceptable and occlusal reduction of 1,5-2 mm

monolithic zirconia single posterior crowns with vertical finish line

monolithic zirconia single posterior crowns with vertical finish line fabricated by cad cam machine and cemented by self adhesive resin cement.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

monolithic zirconia single posterior crowns with vertical finish line

Intervention Type OTHER

using special round-ended 2 degrees tapered diamond burs a non-working tip (batt bur). It has coronal diameter of 1.2 mm, apical diameter of 0.7 mm, and non- cutting end of 1 mm, which reduces or avoids damage to the connective attachment and allows a tooth-guided preparation procedure

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

monolithic zirconia single posterior crowns with deep chamfer finish line

deep chamfer of 1 mm average thickness for cervical finish line, a convergence angle of 6-12° on each side and up to 20° total, in some studies, is acceptable and occlusal reduction of 1,5-2 mm

Intervention Type OTHER

monolithic zirconia single posterior crowns with vertical finish line

using special round-ended 2 degrees tapered diamond burs a non-working tip (batt bur). It has coronal diameter of 1.2 mm, apical diameter of 0.7 mm, and non- cutting end of 1 mm, which reduces or avoids damage to the connective attachment and allows a tooth-guided preparation procedure

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. The patients in this study will be in the range of 18-50 years
2. Have no active periodontal or pulpal diseases, have teeth with good restorations
3. Psychologically and physically able to withstand conventional dental procedures
4. Able to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation
5. No tooth mobility or grade 1 can be accepted
6. Patients with teeth problems indicated for single posterior crowns:

1. Badly decayed teeth
2. Teeth restored with large filling restorations
3. Endodontically treated teeth
4. Malformed teeth
5. Malposed teeth (Tilted, over-erupted, rotated, etc.)
6. Spacing between posterior teeth

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients under the age of 18 or being incapable of taking out a contract
2. Patient with active resistant periodontal diseases
3. Patients with any medical condition that impaired correct oral hygiene
4. a conspicuous medical or psychological history
5. bruxism, or known allergic reaction to the materials used.
6. pregnant female patients
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mai Salah Ibrahim Afifi Elgohary

Assistant lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Maha Taymour, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Cairo University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cairo University

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CEBD-CU-2019-9-2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.