Clinical Evaluation of CAD/CAM vs. Conventional Veneer Restorations
NCT ID: NCT06969911
Last Updated: 2025-05-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-05-05
2032-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Minimally Invasive Treatment of Worn Dentition With Innovative CAD-CAM Composites
NCT02828696
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of CAD/CAM and Conventionally Fabricated Singl Implant Abutments.
NCT01229995
Clinical Evaluation of Teeth Prepared With Vertical Preparation Versus Deep Chamfer
NCT05252689
Comparison of Two Implant Prosthetic Pathways
NCT02905838
Evaluation of Chewing Efficiency of Conventional Complete Denture in Comparison to Reinforced Poly Amide Denture
NCT03391063
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conventionally fabricated all-ceramic veneer restorations reveal a long history of clinical success in minimally invasive rehabilitation of the anterior dentition. Nevertheless, conventional manufacturing techniques are prone to fabrication mistakes and must be handled by experienced dental technicians and dentists which results in very high fabrication costs. Therefore, access to minimally invasive restorations is currently restricted for most of the patients. Innovative CAD/CAM techniques have revolutionised restorative treatment options over the last decades and have made all-ceramic restorations more affordable for patients. With further improvements of the CAD/CAM milling devices the machinability of high-strength glass ceramic is now possible.
The aim of both treatment procedures will be to avoid any extensive additional tooth structure removal, to provide long-term survival and success of the integrated restorations and to improve patient´s satisfaction. Up to now scientific evidence on the clinical performance of CAD/CAM fabricated veneers is very limited. Aim of this trial is to evaluate if the clinical performance of anterior restorations after minimally invasive therapeutic intervention with CAD/CAM veneers compared to conventionally fabricated veneers. Functional and aesthetic treatment results will be assessed for five years and evaluated with regard to failure and succes veneer restorations as well as patient satisfaction.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control Group: Conventional veneer restoration
Therapeutic intervention with minimally invasive traditionally fabricated all-ceramic anterior veneers.
Laminate Veneer Convetional
Minimally invasive therapeutic intervention with CAD/CAM veneers
Study Group: CAD/CAM veneer restoration
Therapeutic intervention with minimally invasive CAD/CAM all-ceramic anterior veneers.
Laminate veneer CAD/CAM
Minimally invasive therapeutic intervention with CAD/CAM veneers
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Laminate veneer CAD/CAM
Minimally invasive therapeutic intervention with CAD/CAM veneers
Laminate Veneer Convetional
Minimally invasive therapeutic intervention with CAD/CAM veneers
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients that reveal indication for a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 6 anterior veneer restorations
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Heinrich-Heine University
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.