Clinical Assessment of Two Inlay -Retained Bridge Designs

NCT ID: NCT03224273

Last Updated: 2017-09-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-12-31

Study Completion Date

2019-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

in the last years, dentistry is going to the concept of conservatism to preserve the most amount of tooth structure, so the evolution of new ceramic materials with invasive designs like (inlay- shaped and proximal box shaped) inlay retained bridge, the investigators can restore single missing posterior teeth with less invasive techniques and less rate of restoration fracture.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

It has been demonstrated that a great amount of tooth structure is lost during the prosthetic preparations of abutments for full-coverage FDPs with tooth substance removal of 63% of 73%, this aggressive loss of tooth structure usually accompanied with pain and postoperative sensitivity. In comparison With the inlay-retained bridge, there is less amount of tooth substance loss. this clinical study will provide benefits for practitioners and clinicians by guiding them to choose a more conservative treatment plan with the better marginal fit, clinical performance and satisfaction for the patients on the long term. rather than other benefits like less chair time, less risk for pulp injury, less time and cost

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tooth Fractures

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

( proximal box design)

The proximal box at least ( 1mm wide and has 6◦ divergences, and extend 2 mm apical to the isthmus floor.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

proximal box inlay retained bridge

Intervention Type OTHER

inlay retained bridge is the less invasive type to restore single missing teeth in the posterior area

( inlay shaped design)

The occlusal inlay has a preparation depth of 2.0 mm for the ceramic. The occlusal preparation ( 4 mm wide and extend 4mm for premolar and 6 mm for molar mesiodistally

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

proximal box inlay retained bridge

Intervention Type OTHER

inlay retained bridge is the less invasive type to restore single missing teeth in the posterior area

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

proximal box inlay retained bridge

inlay retained bridge is the less invasive type to restore single missing teeth in the posterior area

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

all ceramic inlay retained bridge

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Absence of periapical or periodontal or diseases
* sound abutment teeth or with small caries or filling on occlusal or proximal surfaces
* Maintenance of good oral hygiene
* No tooth mobility or grade 1 can be accepted
* Sufficient occluso-gingival tooth height (5mm)
* Good alignment of abutment teeth
* mesiodistal edentulous space preferred not exceed 12mm

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients under the age of 18 or being incapable of taking out a contract
* Patients with any medical condition that impaired correct oral hygiene
* Endodontic ally treated abutment teeth
* a conspicuous medical or psychological history
* bruxism, or known allergic reaction to the materials used
* limited vertical space for the required connector height of 4mm
* pregnant female patients
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

51 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gomaa soliman

Assistant lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Gomaa Abdallah Soliman, MDS

Role: CONTACT

+201145794545

Mohamed Mahmoud Abdelgawad, MDS

Role: CONTACT

+201221583708

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CEBD-CU-2017-07-14

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.