Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Implants in Protective Occlusion
NCT ID: NCT07256379
Last Updated: 2025-12-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
28 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-09-01
2025-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Protective occlusion
According to the literature, Misch introduced the concept of implant-protective occlusion (IPO) (Misch and Bidez, 1994) based on basic prosthetic concepts, bone biomechanical principles and finite element analysis, which refers to an occlusal scheme designed for implant restoration, promoting the conditions for less biomechanical complications by reducing the stress to the implant interface and enhancing the longevity of the implant and prosthesis. It mainly entails the elimination of premature occlusal contacts or interferences.
Protective occlusion
To evaluate crestal bone loss, chewing efficiency and prosthetic complications after single posterior implant restoration in protective occlusion in comparison to maximum intercuspation occlusion.
Maximum Intercuspation
Maximum Intercusption
to evaluate crestal bone loss, chewing efficiency and prosthetic complications after single posterior implant restoration in protective occlusion in comparison to maximum intercuspation occlusion.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Maximum Intercusption
to evaluate crestal bone loss, chewing efficiency and prosthetic complications after single posterior implant restoration in protective occlusion in comparison to maximum intercuspation occlusion.
Protective occlusion
To evaluate crestal bone loss, chewing efficiency and prosthetic complications after single posterior implant restoration in protective occlusion in comparison to maximum intercuspation occlusion.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Adults above the age of 18.
* Good oral hygiene.
* Patient accepts to provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant and lactating females.
* Medically compromised patients.
* Patients with untreated active periodontal diseases.
* Patients with parafunctional habits.
18 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
International Dental Contiuing Education
NETWORK
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
International Dental Continuing Education
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IDCE-16112025
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id