Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Robotic vs Laparoscopic Right Colon Cancer: a 10-year Single-center Retrospective Study

NCT ID: NCT06454253

Last Updated: 2024-06-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1879 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-12-01

Study Completion Date

2024-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the short-term outcomes and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted right colon group for cancer compared to laparoscopic-assisted right colon group. This is a large sample study based on ten years of clinical data. The main question it aims to answer is: What are the advantages of da Vinci robot right hemicolectomy compared to laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, and is there a difference in long-term efficacy between the two methods.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is highly prevalent worldwide. In China, CRC ranks high among the population of men and women with cancer. The incidence and mortality rates of CRC are rising quickly in developing countries, and it is the fourth most deadly cancer in the world. In particular, the right colon cancer (RCC) is continuously growing in China, and the early symptoms of RCC are not typical. one of the most useful ways for RCC is surgical is a surgical operation. Along with the development of minimally invasive surgery, the use of laparoscopy for colon cancer is widely accepted and has become one symbolic surgical technology. Studies have demonstrated that laparoscopic colonic surgery is related to reduced pain after operation, shorter rehabilitation time, shorter length of hospital stay, reduced the time of ileus after surgery, and reduced surgical site infection.

Nevertheless, laparoscopic surgery also has its shortcoming, including a limited range of motion, slow learning and growth, and physiological tremor cannot be eliminated.The emergence of robots has broken the inherent disadvantage of laparoscopy. It has achieved similar or better results in previous studies. Based on these advantages, robotic surgery has received much attention from the surgeons. With the first robotic surgery in the field of colon cancer was reported in 2002, there are some studies proved the safety and feasibility by using robot,However, most studies with small sample sizes and with cases at a relatively early stage.

Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes between RARC and LARC in the treatment of right colon cancer in our center.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Robotic Laparoscopic Colon Cancer Long-term Outcomes Short-term Outcomes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

robot-assisted right colon group

Robot assisted radical surgery for right colon cancer

Da Vinci Robot Surgical System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Performing surgery on right colon cancer patients using the da Vinci robotic surgical system or laparoscopic surgical system

laparoscopic-assisted right colon group

Laparoscopic assisted radical surgery for right colon cancer

Da Vinci Robot Surgical System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Performing surgery on right colon cancer patients using the da Vinci robotic surgical system or laparoscopic surgical system

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Da Vinci Robot Surgical System

Performing surgery on right colon cancer patients using the da Vinci robotic surgical system or laparoscopic surgical system

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Laparoscopic surgical system

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. The age is more than 18 years old and less than or equal to 85 years old
2. No distant metastasis (including pelvic cavity, peritoneum, liver, lung, brain, bone, distant lymph node metastasis, etc.) is judged by ultrasound, CT, PET-CT, etc
3. Preoperative colonoscopy showing that the tumor was located in the ileocecal region, ascending colon, hepatic flexure, or transverse colon with pathology showing malignancy
4. signed informed consent. -

Exclusion Criteria

1. multiple primary colorectal cancer
2. recurrent right colon cancer
3. preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy
4. emergency surgery for intestinal obstruction, bleeding or perforation
5. incomplete data and missing follow-up data. -
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Taiyuan Li

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Taiyuan Li

the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IIT2023015

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.