Comparison of Short-term Outcomes of Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgery in Patients With Different Body Mass Index for Mid and Low Rectal Cancer

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1413 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-01

Study Completion Date

2024-04-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Numerous comparison studies on the outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer have been undertaken and reported. But there aren't many studies that compare the safety and effectiveness of the two surgery procedures used to treat people with mid and low rectal cancer who have different body mass indexes (BMIs). This study was done to organize the clinical data we had at our hospital so we could compare the perioperative effectiveness of two minimally invasive approaches for people with different BMIs.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Comparison of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Visceral Obesity in Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

NCT06397053

Visceral Obesity Rectal Cancer Robotic Surgery

COMPLETED

Assessing the Benefits of Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgery for Mid and Low Rectal Cancer in Patients: The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)

NCT06396845

Robotic Laparoscopic Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer

COMPLETED

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Middle and Low Rectal Cancer: a Target Trial Emulation

NCT06814093

Rectal Cancer

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Comparison of Short- and Long-term Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Hemicolectomy of Right Colon Cancer : A Multicenter Propensity Score Matching Analysis

NCT07029464

Robotic Surgical Procedures Right Colon Tumors Cancer +1 more

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Gender Differences in Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: a Retrospective Study

NCT06391060

Rectal Cancer Gender Complication,Postoperative +1 more

COMPLETED

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CROSSOVER

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

laparoscopic surgery

robotic surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

robotic surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

robotic surgery

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

robotic surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

The inclusion decision was made based on the following criteria: the results of the preoperative evaluation revealed the existence of adenocarcinoma in the middle to lower rectum (less than 10 centimeters distant from the anal edge); received a drastic operation that might have been laparoscopic or robotic and was based on the principle of TME; distant metastases that are non-conformist or heteroclinic, and there are no additional malignant tumors present at the same time as the operation.

Exclusion Criteria

a high tumor location that was more than 10 centimeters away from the anal margin; surgery was unsuccessful in completing anal preservation due to invasion of the external anal sphincter; cancerous obstruction or perforation; severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction classified as stage IV according to the ASA score; and poor preoperative anal function; any resection that is performed in combination, rather than being a R0 resection.

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No