High-dose Opioid Versus Opioid-sparing Anaesthesia in Cardiac Surgery

NCT ID: NCT06437886

Last Updated: 2024-07-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-04-22

Study Completion Date

2024-07-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

BACKGROUND In cardiac surgery, high-dose opioid contributes to adverse events associated with poor postoperative outcomes. There is growing evidence that nerve block-based multi-modal anesthesia protocols may reduce intraoperative opioid consumption without compromising analgesia management and consequently improve patient's early postoperative recovery.

OBJECTIVE To determine whether opioid-sparing anaesthesia based on ultrasound-guided nerve block could improve early postoperative recovery after cardiac surgery.

DESIGN A randomised controlled trial. SETTING A tertiary hospital. PATIENTS Eighty patients aged 45 to 70 years undergoing cardiac surgery were enrolled. Key exclusion criteria included contraindication to interventions or drugs and a history of chronic pain or chronic opioid use.

INTERVENTIONS Eligible patients were randomised at a 1:1 ratio to receive either opioid-sparing anaesthesia based on ultrasound-guided nerve block (intervention group) or opioid-based anaesthesia (control group).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the global score of the 15-item Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire at 24h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included QoR-15 at 72h after surgery, postoperative pain score, the incidence of postoperative adverse events and chronic pain. Other outcomes included endotracheal intubation duration, length of hospitalization, and hospital costs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiac Surgery Patients

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

pecto-intercostal fascial block and rectus sheath block-based opioid-sparing anesthesia

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

opioid-sparing protocol

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients in the OSA group was administrated with 0.5 to 1 mcg·kg-1 sufentanil and received PIFB combined with RSB after anesthetic induction. Patients in the control group were recommended to receive 2 to 3 mcg·kg-1 opioid-based sufentanil. PIFB was conducted at the T2 to T5 levels under ultrasound guidance. Each side received 20 ml 0.3% ropivacaine containing 2.5 mg dexamethasone. Bilateral RSB was conducted after the PIFB and the needle was inserted into the plane between the rectus abdominal muscle and its posterior sheath using an in-plane approach. After verifying needle placement, 15 ml 0.3% ropivacaine containing 2.5 mg dexamethasone was delivered to each side. In the control group, patients received no procedure and were administrated with traditional anesthetic protocol. Patients received continuous intravenous sufentanil (50 to 100 mg) and tropisetron (5 to 10 mg) at 2 ml·h-1 for the first 48 hours after surgery.

high-dose opiod traditional anesthesia

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

opioid-sparing protocol

Patients in the OSA group was administrated with 0.5 to 1 mcg·kg-1 sufentanil and received PIFB combined with RSB after anesthetic induction. Patients in the control group were recommended to receive 2 to 3 mcg·kg-1 opioid-based sufentanil. PIFB was conducted at the T2 to T5 levels under ultrasound guidance. Each side received 20 ml 0.3% ropivacaine containing 2.5 mg dexamethasone. Bilateral RSB was conducted after the PIFB and the needle was inserted into the plane between the rectus abdominal muscle and its posterior sheath using an in-plane approach. After verifying needle placement, 15 ml 0.3% ropivacaine containing 2.5 mg dexamethasone was delivered to each side. In the control group, patients received no procedure and were administrated with traditional anesthetic protocol. Patients received continuous intravenous sufentanil (50 to 100 mg) and tropisetron (5 to 10 mg) at 2 ml·h-1 for the first 48 hours after surgery.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Male or female adult patients aged 45 to 70 years, awaiting elective cardiac surgery, and American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classes II or III were eligible.

Exclusion Criteria

contraindications to punctual or local anesthetic drugs, a history of chronic pain or chronic opioid use, and an inability to communicate or refuse to enroll.
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yan Fuxia

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fuwai hospital

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024-2323

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Precision Analgesia for Cardiac Surgery
NCT05612399 NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Preventing Pain After Heart Surgery
NCT01480765 COMPLETED PHASE4