A Prospective Observational Study Comparing Computer-Assisted Paramedian Approach Versus Conventional Midline Approach for Lumbar Puncture

NCT ID: NCT06418841

Last Updated: 2024-05-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

84 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-10-28

Study Completion Date

2025-10-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of CMPAT and MAT in patients undergoing LP. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the CMPAT treatment group (group A) or the MAT treatment group (group B). Researchers will compare CMPAT treatment group and the MAT treatment group to see if the number of needle insertion attempts required for a successful LP, the puncture success rate, pain assessment in the back, head, and legs, and the occurrence of complications have different.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Puncture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Computer-Assisted Paramedian Approac Technique

The L3-4 inter-laminar space will be selected as the target for puncture, and in the longitudinal direction, 1.0-1.5cm will be opened beside the upper edge of the spinous process (tip) of the lower vertebra as the entry point. The lumbar puncture needle will be inserted vertically along the axis of the anesthesia needle. The puncture path will be maintained completely perpendicular to the skin until the needle reached the PLTLF (posterior layer of the thoracolumbar fascia), where some resistance will be felt. The puncture direction is adjusted as needed. The tip of the needle will be tilted 20±10° in the sagittal direction and 15±5° inward such that the tip will point at the midpoint of the spinal canal. After the needle reaches the PLTLF, it will be further inserted 3-7 cm.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Computer-Assisted Paramedian Approach Technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Computer-Assisted Paramedian Approach Technique

Conventional Midline Approach Technique

Puncture will be performed on the posterior median line near the midpoint of the L3-4 Space of spinous process. The lumbar puncture needle will be inserted vertically along the axis of the anesthesia needle, or the tip of the needle will be tilted 15° in the sagittal direction toward the head, so that the needle path is parallel to the space of spinous process.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Conventional Midline Approach Technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional Midline Approach Technique

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Computer-Assisted Paramedian Approach Technique

Computer-Assisted Paramedian Approach Technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional Midline Approach Technique

Conventional Midline Approach Technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aged 18-99 years. Indication for lumber puncture (diagnostic lumbar puncture, analysis of cerebrospinal fluid composition, measurement of cerebrospinal fluid pressure, release of cerebrospinal fluid, lumbar cistern drain-age or intrathecal injection).

Body mass index between 18.5 and 35 kg/m2.

Exclusion Criteria

* Cerebral hernia or known high cerebrospinal fluid pressure prone to cerebral hernia.
* Oral anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy (≤3 days) or coagulation dysfunction, various factors lead to a higher risk of bleeding.
* Active infection or prior infection at the surgical site.
* Skin breakdown.
* Previous spine fusion surgery.
* Cauda equina syndrome.
* Pregnancy or breast feeding.
* Severe comorbid medical or psychiatric disorder.
* Unwilling to adhere to any of the required procedures.
* Cognitive impairment interfering with participant's ability to give full and - - informed consent or complete the baseline or follow-up assessments.
* Survival expectation less than 1 month.
* Moving abroad in 1 month.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fujian Medical University Union Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Yuan-Dong Zhuang

Role: CONTACT

15260866029

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ChiCTR2300067936

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

CMP vs Fascia Iliaca Block
NCT04426058 UNKNOWN NA
Pre-post Spinal Popliteal Block
NCT05354791 TERMINATED