Rivanna Ultrasound for Neuraxial Block

NCT ID: NCT03214640

Last Updated: 2021-07-28

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

128 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-10-23

Study Completion Date

2019-04-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

We hypothesize that the Rivanna Accuro or similar U/S device would reduce time to success of identifying epidural and/or intrathecal spaces as compared to conventional palpation method.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Administration of (neuraxial blocks) spinal and epidural blocks is commonly achieved by first palpating the landmarks for midline with spinous process and iliac crest for L3-4-5 intervertebral spaces. With an epidural block, a loss of resistance in a pressurized syringe is used to incrementally advance the epidural needle until identification of epidural space with loss of resistance in the pressurized syringe. With a spinal block, the spinal needle is advanced incrementally until a noted "feel" of dural puncture together with return of spinal fluid via the spinal needle. The palpation technique and somewhat "blind" technique to identify the spinal and epidural spaces become more difficult and less reliable particularly with the increasing prevalence of the morbid and super-morbid obese patients. Ultrasound devices have become common and successful with non-neuraxial blocks and venous accesses, both involving mostly non-bony, soft tissues. Application of conventional ultrasound for neuraxial blocks has been limited by its bulkiness, limited imaging for bony structures and lack of automated artificial intelligent algorithm for pattern recognition. Recent technological advancement has addressed the aforementioned limitations. Rivanna Accuro is one such device that has gained FDA approval and may have helped in addressing some of these issues. It is a handheld (pocket size) U/S device with real time pattern recognition for bony structures such as the spine while providing 3-D overlay for recognition of the midline spinous process and epidural spaces and distance. The investigators hypothesize that the Rivanna Accuro or similar U/S device would reduce time to success of identifying epidural and/or intrathecal spaces as compared to conventional palpation method. We will compare placement of neuraxial block between palpation method versus ultrasound method. We will compare placement of spinal block for cesarean delivery with palpation versus with ultrasound method, and then comparing placement of neuraxial analgeisa block (combined spinal epidural analgesia) for labor analgesia with palpation versus ultrasound method.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Analgesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

There are 4 arms for this study--two are active comparators and two are experimental. The first arm is palpation with spinal block. The second arm is palpation with neuraxial block. The third arm is ultrasound with spinal block. The fourth arm is ultrasound with neuraxial block. Randomization is done twice - first for randomization of spinal block subjects between using palpation versus ultrasound method; and again randomization for neuraxial block (combined spinal epidural) subjects between using palpation versus ultrasound method. There will be a total of 120 planned evaluable subjects. This consists of planned evaluable randomized 60 subjects receiving spinal block for cesarean delivery (30 for palpation and 30 for ultrasound); and planned evaluable randomized 60 subjects receiving neuraxial (combined spinal epidural) block for labor analgesia.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Palpation with spinal block (Group C-P)

insertion will be identified by palpation using conventional landmarks (spinous process and iliac crest) for placement of spinal block for cesarean delivery

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Palpation

Intervention Type OTHER

When the subject is ready for neuraxial procedure, the location for the epidural or spinal needle insertion will be identified with Palpation method using conventional landmarks (spinous process and iliac crest). For subjects in group C-P or L-P, the needle insertion site will be the site identified by the Palpation method. After placement of spinal for Cesarean or epidural for labor, the usual standard dose of medication will be administered as in usual manner for patients regardless in this study or not.

Spinal Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Spinal anesthetic medications will be utilized in providing surgical block for cesarean delivery as is standard of care

Palpation with neuraxial block (Group L-P)

the needle insertion site for the neuraxial block will be identified with palpation for labor analgesia, using the spinous process and iliac crest for reference

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Palpation

Intervention Type OTHER

When the subject is ready for neuraxial procedure, the location for the epidural or spinal needle insertion will be identified with Palpation method using conventional landmarks (spinous process and iliac crest). For subjects in group C-P or L-P, the needle insertion site will be the site identified by the Palpation method. After placement of spinal for Cesarean or epidural for labor, the usual standard dose of medication will be administered as in usual manner for patients regardless in this study or not.

Neuraxial Analgesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Labor analgesia will be provided utilizing the standard medications to provide labor analgesia

Rivanna Accuro Ultrasound Device with spinal block (Group C-R)

insertion will be identified with Rivanna Accuro U/S device for placement of spinal block for cesarean delivery

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Rivanna Accuro US Device

Intervention Type DEVICE

When the subject is ready for neuraxial procedure, the location for the epidural or spinal needle insertion will be identified with Rivanna Accuro U/S device. For subjects in group C-R or L-R, the needle insertion site will be the site identified by the Rivanna Accuro U/S device. After placement of spinal for Cesarean or epidural for labor, the usual standard dose of medication will be administered as in usual manner for patients regardless in this study or not.

Spinal Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Spinal anesthetic medications will be utilized in providing surgical block for cesarean delivery as is standard of care

Rivanna Ultrasound Device with neuraxial block (Group L-R)

insertion will be identified with Rivanna Accuro U/S device for placement of neuraxial block (combined spinal epidural) for labor analgesia

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Rivanna Accuro US Device

Intervention Type DEVICE

When the subject is ready for neuraxial procedure, the location for the epidural or spinal needle insertion will be identified with Rivanna Accuro U/S device. For subjects in group C-R or L-R, the needle insertion site will be the site identified by the Rivanna Accuro U/S device. After placement of spinal for Cesarean or epidural for labor, the usual standard dose of medication will be administered as in usual manner for patients regardless in this study or not.

Neuraxial Analgesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Labor analgesia will be provided utilizing the standard medications to provide labor analgesia

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Rivanna Accuro US Device

When the subject is ready for neuraxial procedure, the location for the epidural or spinal needle insertion will be identified with Rivanna Accuro U/S device. For subjects in group C-R or L-R, the needle insertion site will be the site identified by the Rivanna Accuro U/S device. After placement of spinal for Cesarean or epidural for labor, the usual standard dose of medication will be administered as in usual manner for patients regardless in this study or not.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Palpation

When the subject is ready for neuraxial procedure, the location for the epidural or spinal needle insertion will be identified with Palpation method using conventional landmarks (spinous process and iliac crest). For subjects in group C-P or L-P, the needle insertion site will be the site identified by the Palpation method. After placement of spinal for Cesarean or epidural for labor, the usual standard dose of medication will be administered as in usual manner for patients regardless in this study or not.

Intervention Type OTHER

Neuraxial Analgesia

Labor analgesia will be provided utilizing the standard medications to provide labor analgesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Spinal Block

Spinal anesthetic medications will be utilized in providing surgical block for cesarean delivery as is standard of care

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* BMI \>30
* Female requesting analgesia for delivery, be it via vaginal or cesarean delivery

Exclusion Criteria

* Allergy to ultrasound gel
* Contraindication to receiving neuraxial analgesia
* Under the age of 18
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Peter Pan, MD, MSEE

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Professor, Anesthesiology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm?ID=K132736

510(k) clearance for the Rivanna Accuro handheld ultrasound device

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB00044968

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Ultrasound for Neuraxial Anesthesia
NCT02553746 COMPLETED NA