Nerve Stimulator for Patients With Upper Extremity Disease, Vascular or Orthopedic Surgery

NCT ID: NCT03112642

Last Updated: 2024-03-05

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

8 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-11-30

Study Completion Date

2021-03-09

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To help determine if there is improved pain relief when a device that makes an arm muscle move (nerve stimulator) is used to place a needle in the area above the collarbone to prevent feeling of pain (anesthesia) of the upper arm.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Investigators will use the assessment of onset of motor and sensory block Q 5 minutes to distinguish the difference between blocks performed with ultrasound guidance with or without a nerve blockade monitor.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Other Biomechanical Lesions of Upper Extremity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard Group

In the Standard Group, in the absence of paresthesia and after negative aspiration, the 40 ml of local anesthetic block \[0.35% marcaine\] will be administered into the brachial plexus of the upper limb being operated on, at the supraclavicular level.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Local anesthetic block [0.35% marcaine]

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In the absence of paresthesia and after negative aspiration, the 40 ml of local anesthetic block \[0.35% marcaine\] will be administered.

Test Group

In this group, the ultrasound guided local anesthetic block into the brachial plexus at the supraclavicular level of the upper limb being operated on will be supplemented by use of a blockade monitor (Nerve stimulator device) to direct final placement of the needle for the nerve block.

Only this group of the patients will receive this intervention with sufficient detail so that it can be distinguished from the Test Group

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Local anesthetic block [0.35% marcaine]

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In the absence of paresthesia and after negative aspiration, the 40 ml of local anesthetic block \[0.35% marcaine\] will be administered.

Braun DIG-R-C Stimuplex Blockade Monitor System

Intervention Type DEVICE

The blockade system will be initially set at 1 milliamp. As the proximity of the tip of the needle to the components of the brachial plexus becomes evident by ultrasound approximation and the stimulation pattern of the hand and wrist, the output of the system will be reduced to .3-.5 milliamps. With use of the Braun DIG-R-C Stimuplex Blockade Monitor System.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Local anesthetic block [0.35% marcaine]

In the absence of paresthesia and after negative aspiration, the 40 ml of local anesthetic block \[0.35% marcaine\] will be administered.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Braun DIG-R-C Stimuplex Blockade Monitor System

The blockade system will be initially set at 1 milliamp. As the proximity of the tip of the needle to the components of the brachial plexus becomes evident by ultrasound approximation and the stimulation pattern of the hand and wrist, the output of the system will be reduced to .3-.5 milliamps. With use of the Braun DIG-R-C Stimuplex Blockade Monitor System.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

40 ml of local anesthetic block [0.35% marcaine]

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult male and females 21 through 89
* Agree to study participation and signed the informed consent
* Scheduled for upper extremity surgery with ultrasound guided supraclavicular block -

Exclusion Criteria

* Children
* Pregnant Women
* Persons with allergies to local anesthetics
* Persons with infections at or near site of needle insertion
* Patients with severe disturbance of cardiac rhythm and heart block
* Patients with severe respiratory compromise
* Patients requiring bilateral upper extremity anesthesia
* Patients with coagulopathy or medical anticoagulation
* Patients with traumatic nerve injury to neck or upper extremity
* Patients with preexisting neurological deficits in the distribution of the block
* Patients with previous surgery to the neck that may distort brachial plexus anatomy
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

89 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

William Grubb, M.D.

Principal Investigator, Associate Professor of Anesthesiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

William Grubb, DDS, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital

New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0220110040

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.