Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Compared to Passive Assisted Neurodynamics in Brachial Plexus Neuropathy

NCT ID: NCT05432973

Last Updated: 2022-06-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

11 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-04-01

Study Completion Date

2023-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Brachial plexus neuropathies, specifically of the median, radial, ulnar, suprascapular, axillary and dorsal scapular nerves, can arise when a peripheral nerve trunk or nerve root is subjected to injury, compression, inflammation or ischemia, resulting in reduced physical capabilities of the peripheral nervous system. Although pharmacological treatments provide mild symptomatic relief in the short term, they are not without side effects.

Neurostimulation techniques may be an effective treatment option for peripheral brachial plexus neuropathies. Some of these procedures are transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) or percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS). Although some case series have documented a positive effect in relation to ultrasound-guided PENS for subjects with subacromial pain syndrome or postsurgical pain, the lack of studies, to our knowledge, analyzing the effects of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, in relation to pain and paresthesias in subjects with brachial plexus neuropathy, warrants investigation for this goal.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Peripheral Neuropathy Neuropathic Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PENS

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In the PENS treatment, a biphasic continuous waveform current with a frequency of 2 Hz, a pulse width of 50 microseconds and an intensity that produces visible motor responses of the innervated muscles was used, below the patient's pain threshold. The NT6021 Percutaneous Neuromodulation equipment of the Nutek® brand distributed by Fisiolab Ibérica® was used. This equipment has the CE marking, which denotes compliance with the requirements of the legislation of Royal Decree 414/1996 of March 1, which regulates medical devices. B.O.E. of April 24, 1996

Neurodynamics and manual therapy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Neurodynamic and manual therapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The manual therapy consisted of passive-assisted mobilization and massage therapy of the muscular and fascial tissue, beginning with the cervical area, kneading while asking the patient to rotate the neck and then in the same way along the muscles and soft tissues innervated by the target nerve.

Neurodynamic was performed in a passive-assisted manner, combining the patient's cervical mobilizations with the mobility of the upper limbs adapted to each case.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation

In the PENS treatment, a biphasic continuous waveform current with a frequency of 2 Hz, a pulse width of 50 microseconds and an intensity that produces visible motor responses of the innervated muscles was used, below the patient's pain threshold. The NT6021 Percutaneous Neuromodulation equipment of the Nutek® brand distributed by Fisiolab Ibérica® was used. This equipment has the CE marking, which denotes compliance with the requirements of the legislation of Royal Decree 414/1996 of March 1, which regulates medical devices. B.O.E. of April 24, 1996

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Neurodynamic and manual therapy

The manual therapy consisted of passive-assisted mobilization and massage therapy of the muscular and fascial tissue, beginning with the cervical area, kneading while asking the patient to rotate the neck and then in the same way along the muscles and soft tissues innervated by the target nerve.

Neurodynamic was performed in a passive-assisted manner, combining the patient's cervical mobilizations with the mobility of the upper limbs adapted to each case.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects with upper limb neural symptomatology between 18 and 60 years of age, presenting two or more of the following conditions:
* Paresthesias in any territory of the shoulder girdle, arm or hand
* Pain at rest in any territory of the upper extremity.
* Pain at rest in any upper extremity territory
* Sensations of electric shock in any territory of the shoulder girdle, arm or hand.
* Allodynia or cutaneous hyperalgesia in any territory of the shoulder girdle, arm or hand.

Exclusion Criteria

* Less than 2 weeks of evolution
* Fracture in the affected upper extremity
* Suffering from another joint disorder such as osteoarthritis or rheumatic disease
* Suffering from generalized neuropathies due to neuromuscular disease or medication
* Inability to understand instructions or sign informed consent.
* Wearing a pacemaker or any electrical device implanted in the body
* Epilepsy
* Aversion or fear of needles
* Pregnant.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Josue Fernandez Carnero

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Physiotherapy and exercise center Origenkinesis

Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Víctor Navarro López, PhD student

Role: CONTACT

697371075

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Víctor Navarro López, PhD student

Role: primary

697371075

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PENS210722

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.