Comparison of Perineural Catheter Depth for the Continuous Popliteal Nerve Block Using Ultrasound Guidance and Dermabond

NCT ID: NCT01591603

Last Updated: 2015-07-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

83 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-05-31

Study Completion Date

2015-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study will investigate the difference in success rate between popliteal peripheral nerve catheters placed at 1 centimeter compared to 5 centimeters past the tip of a Tuohy needle.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Traditionally for the lower extremity, peripheral nerve catheters have been threaded greater than or equal to 5 centimeters past the tip of the Tuohy needle. The major rational for this practice is to reduce dislodgement. However, the greater the distance that a catheter is advanced, the greater the risk of contacting undesired structures, kinking, looping and knotting. For the continuous popliteal nerve block, the catheter is threaded perpendicular to the course of the nerve. This could result in the tip of the catheter being a significant distance from the targeted nerve which may lead to a decrease in the success rate or efficacy of the block.

Greater efficacy may be seen if the needle is closer to its target. This may be quantified by documenting a faster onset of motor and sensory changes and/or a lower catheter infusion rate required to maintain pain control. The study will investigate the difference in success rate between popliteal peripheral nerve catheters placed at 1 centimeter compared to 5 centimeters past the tip of a Tuohy needle.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neuromuscular Inhibition

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

1 cm

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A Tuohy needle will be advanced in-plane with the bevel cephalad to a point that lies between the tibial and common peroneal branches of the sciatic nerve. The catheter will be advanced 1 cm past the tip of the Tuohy

Group 2

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

5 cm

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A Tuohy needle will be advanced in-plane with the bevel cephalad to a point that lies between the tibial and common peroneal branches of the sciatic nerve. The catheter will be advanced 5 cm past the tip of the Tuohy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

1 cm

A Tuohy needle will be advanced in-plane with the bevel cephalad to a point that lies between the tibial and common peroneal branches of the sciatic nerve. The catheter will be advanced 1 cm past the tip of the Tuohy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

5 cm

A Tuohy needle will be advanced in-plane with the bevel cephalad to a point that lies between the tibial and common peroneal branches of the sciatic nerve. The catheter will be advanced 5 cm past the tip of the Tuohy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

18 gauge 100mm Contiplex Tuohy needle 20-gauge non-stimulating catheter 18 gauge 100mm Contiplex Tuohy needle 20-gauge non-stimulating catheter

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Will be having a popliteal nerve blocks

Exclusion Criteria

* \< 18 years old
* BMI \> 35
* Pregnant patients
* Diabetes mellitus or patients with known neuropathy
* Amputations \& polytrauma patients
* Patients allergic to local anesthetics
* Chronic Pain patients
* Patients in whom communication is a problem
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Vanderbilt University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Clifford Bowens

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clifford Bowens, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bowens C Jr, Badiola IJ, Allen BFS, Canlas CL, Gupta RK, Jaeger LM, Briggs ER, Corey JM, Shi Y, Schildcrout JS, Malchow RJ. Color Doppler ultrasonography of an agitated solution is predictive of accurate catheter placement for a continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block. Perioper Med (Lond). 2021 Dec 15;10(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13741-021-00229-w.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34906248 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

120382

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.