A Comparison Between Posterior, Lateral and Medial Approaches for Ultrasound-guided Popliteal Block
NCT ID: NCT06489210
Last Updated: 2024-07-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-04-01
2021-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Onset Time of Nerve Block: A Comparison of Two Injection Locations in Patients Having Lower Leg/ Foot Surgery
NCT01542840
Analgesic Efficacy of Blocking Nerve to Vastus Lateralis Muscle Versus Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve After Knee Surgeries
NCT06809842
The Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Adductor Canal Block Versus 4 in 1 Block in Patients Undergoing Knee Surgeries: A Comparative Randomized Double Blinded Study .
NCT05794685
Effectiveness of Peripheral Blocks Under Ultrasound Control With and Without Electrical Nerve Stimulation
NCT05054881
Ultrasound Plus Nerve Stimulator Versus Nerve Stimulator Guided Lumbar Plexus Block
NCT02020096
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
popliteal block posterior approach group
through posterior approach ultrasound guided sciatic nerve block at popliteal fossa 20ml of the selected local anesthetic mixture (10ml of 0.5% bupivacaine mixed with 10ml of 2% lidocaine, each with 1:200,000 epinephrine) was injected incrementally
popliteal block
using ultrasound to detect sciatic nerve and popliteal fossa through different approaches using 20ml of the selected local anesthetic mixture (10ml of 0.5% bupivacaine mixed with 10ml of 2% lidocaine, each with 1:200,000 epinephrine) was injected incrementally
popliteal block lateral approach group
ultrasound guided sciatic nerve block at popliteal fossa through lateral approach 20ml of the selected local anesthetic mixture (10ml of 0.5% bupivacaine mixed with 10ml of 2% lidocaine, each with 1:200,000 epinephrine) was injected incrementally
popliteal block
using ultrasound to detect sciatic nerve and popliteal fossa through different approaches using 20ml of the selected local anesthetic mixture (10ml of 0.5% bupivacaine mixed with 10ml of 2% lidocaine, each with 1:200,000 epinephrine) was injected incrementally
poplitea block medial approach group
ultrasound guided sciatic nerve block at popliteal fossa through medial approach 20ml of the selected local anesthetic mixture (10ml of 0.5% bupivacaine mixed with 10ml of 2% lidocaine, each with 1:200,000 epinephrine) was injected incrementally
popliteal block
using ultrasound to detect sciatic nerve and popliteal fossa through different approaches using 20ml of the selected local anesthetic mixture (10ml of 0.5% bupivacaine mixed with 10ml of 2% lidocaine, each with 1:200,000 epinephrine) was injected incrementally
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
popliteal block
using ultrasound to detect sciatic nerve and popliteal fossa through different approaches using 20ml of the selected local anesthetic mixture (10ml of 0.5% bupivacaine mixed with 10ml of 2% lidocaine, each with 1:200,000 epinephrine) was injected incrementally
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* weighing 70-85 kg,
* undergoing elective below knee surgeries
Exclusion Criteria
* those having an allergy to local anesthetics
* peripheral neuropathy, coagulopathy
* diabetes mellitus
* severe hepatic
* renal impairment
* infection, mass and crush injury or open wound at the nerve block site
* patients receiving chronic analgesic therapy.
21 Years
50 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Helwan University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Adel Ali Hassan
lecturer of anaesthesia, intensive care and pain management
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Zagazig University Hospitals
Zagazig, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
4428-4-3-2018
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.