Comparison of Three Approaches of Electrode Placement to Detect Changes in Motor Evoked Potentials During Spine Surgery
NCT ID: NCT05098431
Last Updated: 2024-07-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-07-01
2024-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Onset Time of Nerve Block: A Comparison of Two Injection Locations in Patients Having Lower Leg/ Foot Surgery
NCT01542840
Adductor-Canal-Blockade Versus the Femoral Nerve Block Effect on Muscle Strength and Mobilization in Healthy Volunteers
NCT01449097
Electrical Nerve Block for Amputation Pain
NCT02221934
Peripheral Regional Blockade and EMG
NCT06982027
Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block Catheter Placement for Foot Surgery
NCT01049906
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Using transcranial magnetic stimulation, evaluate the effects on compound muscle action potentials utilizing intramuscular bipolar recording vs subdermal referential recordings vs subdermal bipolar recordings.
2. Evaluated the variability of amplitude and area between the intramuscular and subdermal recording techniques.
The initial focus will be on recording techniques to obtain stable MEPs in a proximal lower limb muscle, specifically the quadriceps. Continuation research may focus on stimulation techniques to facilitate proximal MEPs and ultimately to improved specificity of MEP changes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental Arm
Receive Quadriceps MEPs during procedure
Quadriceps and Rectus Femoris MEP Recording
Participants will receive additional electrodes placed intramuscularly to facilitate three separate approaches of quadriceps MEP recording
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Quadriceps and Rectus Femoris MEP Recording
Participants will receive additional electrodes placed intramuscularly to facilitate three separate approaches of quadriceps MEP recording
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients must be undergoing thoracic or lumbar spine surgery where quadriceps MEP recording would be the standard of care
* Patients should have normal preoperative quadriceps strength
* Patients are capable of understanding the informed consent and have signed the informed consent document prior to any study-specific screening procedures or evaluations being performed
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who are non-English speakers.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Allina Health System
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jeffrey A Strommen, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Allina Health
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Abbott Northwestern Hospital
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1565509
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.