Bone Evaluation by Ultrasound Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS) vs Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA)
NCT ID: NCT06371755
Last Updated: 2025-09-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
296 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-11-19
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Clinical Center involved in the study:IRCCS Orthopedic institute Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio The clinical study will evaluate the intra- and inter-operator repeatability of the REMS,(Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry) ultrasound diagnostic technology implemented in the EchoStation device (Echolight Spa, Lecce) and the diagnostic accuracy in comparison with DXA (used as standard reference).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Performance of REMS Bone Densitometry in a British Population
NCT06151353
Clinical Study to Estimate Bone Mineral Density With the POROUS Ultrasound Device
NCT07187518
Smallest Significant Value in Osteodensitomery in an Obese Population
NCT04301427
Clinical Study to Predict the Risk of Bone Fractures With the POROUS Ultrasound Device
NCT06567054
Evaluation of Agreement Between CT Scan and 3D-DXA Measurements on the Lombar Spine
NCT03638674
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To determine the short-term intra-operator precision and inter-operator repeatability of radiofrequency echographic multi-spectrometry (REMS) at the lumbar spine (LS) and proximal femur (FEM). All patients will undergo an ultrasound scan of the LS and FEM. Both precision and repeatability, expressed as root-mean-square coefficient of variation (RMS-CV) and least significant change (LSC) will be evaluated using data from two consecutive REMS acquisitions by the same operator or two different operators, respectively. The precision will be also assessed in the cohort stratified according to BMI classification.
To evaluate the comparison between REMS and DXA diagnostic results, spinal DXA reports were processed separately from femoral ones. According to spinal DXA reports, each patient was classified as osteoporotic\^ if lumbar T-score≤ -2.5 and as non-osteoporotic if lumbar T-score \> -2.5. An independent classification employing the same threshold was adopted on the basis of femoral neck T-score values obtained from femoral DXA reports. In both cases the non-osteoporotic patients were further classified as osteopenic if -2.5 \< T-score \< -1.0 or healthy\^ if T-score≥ -1.0.
The whole classification process was independently repeated on the basis of the corresponding lumbar and femoral neck T-score values obtained from REMS scans.
Diagnostic accuracy of the REMS approach was then assessed by assuming DXA outputs as the standard reference. The diagnostic concordance between the two methods was assessed, by calculating the percentage of patients being classified in the same diagnostic category (osteoporotic, osteopenic, or healthy) by both DXA and REMS together with the degree of correlation between DXA and REMS T-score values.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Execution of additional diagnostic examination
The proposed study is defined as interventional because it introduces an ultrasound examination in the standard clinical routine. The diagnostic approach does not vary during the study and the prescription of any therapeutic treatment is performed on the basis of the conventional DXA diagnosis. This ultrasound examination does not involve additional risks for the patient with the benefit of not using ionizing radiation; it lasts only few minutes and can be performed without moving the patient from the same bed on which he is already positioned for DXA examination.
Ultrasound examination with REMS technology
The proposed study is defined as interventional because it introduces an ultrasound examination in the standard clinical routine. The diagnostic approach does not vary during the study and the prescription of any therapeutic treatment is performed on the basis of the conventional DXA diagnosis. This ultrasound examination does not involve additional risks for the patient with the benefit of not using ionizing radiation; it lasts only few minutes and can be performed without moving the patient from the same bed on which he is already positioned for DXA examination.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ultrasound examination with REMS technology
The proposed study is defined as interventional because it introduces an ultrasound examination in the standard clinical routine. The diagnostic approach does not vary during the study and the prescription of any therapeutic treatment is performed on the basis of the conventional DXA diagnosis. This ultrasound examination does not involve additional risks for the patient with the benefit of not using ionizing radiation; it lasts only few minutes and can be performed without moving the patient from the same bed on which he is already positioned for DXA examination.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* female sex,
* age range 30-80 years (for repeatability study), age range 50-70 years (for accuracy study),
* absence of severe obesity (BMI \< 40 kg/m2),
* absence of severe walking difficulties,
* cognitive underwriting of informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* severe walking difficulties,
* age below 30 years or over 80 years,
* severe obesity (BMI \> 40 kg/m2),
* declared pregnancy.
30 Years
80 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio
OTHER
Paola Pisani
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Paola Pisani
Clinical Director
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Luca M. Sconfienza, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
IRCCS
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio
Milan, MI, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ULTRADXA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.