A Study on Relationship Between Resected Normal Liver Parenchymal Volume(RNLV)and Post-Hepatectomy Liver Failure (PHLF)
NCT ID: NCT06366048
Last Updated: 2024-04-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
1133 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-12-01
2024-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Machine Learning Architecture to Predict Post-Hepatectomy Liver Failure Using Liver Regeneration Biomarkers and Time-Phased Data
NCT05779098
Preoperative Evaluation of the Remaining Part of the Liver for Liver Resection
NCT04100304
Evaluating the Association Between Sphingolipid Metabolites and Post-hepatectomy Liver Failure
NCT03598465
Liver Regeneration After Liver Resection
NCT01220986
Hepatectomy Risk Assessment With Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
NCT04705194
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PHLF group
One group was defined as post-operative liver failure accroding to the PHLF definition of 50-50 criteria and ISGLS criteria.
the different definitions of PHLF according to 50-50 criteria and ISGLS criteria
Our study respectively defined the PHLF according to the 50-50 criteria and the ISGLS criteria in literature review.
No PHLF group
One group was defined as no post-operative liver failure accroding to the PHLF definition of 50-50 criteria nor ISGLS criteria.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
the different definitions of PHLF according to 50-50 criteria and ISGLS criteria
Our study respectively defined the PHLF according to the 50-50 criteria and the ISGLS criteria in literature review.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* histologically confirmed as HCC and ICC
* complete and accessible data
Exclusion Criteria
* any history of portal vein embolism (PVE)
* any history of tumor rupture
* emergency surgery
* pathologically diagnosed with neither HCC nor ICC
* concomitant resection of gastrointestinal organs, spleenectomy or other organs
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Natural Science Foundation of China
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yuan-Yuan Wang
a clinical resident of general surgery department
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yuan-yuan Wang
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University
Shanhai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ioannou GN, Green P, Kerr KF, Berry K. Models estimating risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with alcohol or NAFLD-related cirrhosis for risk stratification. J Hepatol. 2019 Sep;71(3):523-533. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 May 28.
Xie DY, Ren ZG, Zhou J, Fan J, Gao Q. 2019 Chinese clinical guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: updates and insights. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2020 Aug;9(4):452-463. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-20-480.
Renner P, Schuhbaum J, Kroemer A, Zeman F, Loss M, Lang SA, Geissler EK, Schlitt HJ, Farkas SA. Morbidity of hepatic resection for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Feb;401(1):43-53. doi: 10.1007/s00423-015-1359-y. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
Xie QS, Chen ZX, Zhao YJ, Gu H, Geng XP, Liu FB. Systematic review of outcomes and meta-analysis of risk factors for prognosis after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma without cirrhosis. Asian J Surg. 2021 Jan;44(1):36-45. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.08.019. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EHBHKY2022-K-025
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.