Pregnancy Outcomes in Normotensive VS stage1 Hypertension: a Prospective Observational Study

NCT ID: NCT06339749

Last Updated: 2024-07-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

626 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-04-25

Study Completion Date

2026-02-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In 2017, the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines built on evidence that elevated blood pressure increases cardiovascular mortality in the general population, Reclassification of BP; however, these diagnostic definitions do not include pregnant women, and whether newly diagnosed stage 1 hypertension affects pregnancy complications remains unclear. In this study, the combination of maternal factors, MAP and PLGF was used to comprehensively analyze the risk factors of preeclampsia through the "Bayesian rule" developed by the British Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF). According to the guidelines and consensus, the pregnant women were considered to be at high risk when the calculated risk was higher than 1% of the population. To compare the pregnancy outcomes of women with normal blood pressure in the first trimester and stage 1 hypertension in different risk groups, and to find out whether screening for preeclampsia can be omitted for women with normal blood pressure in the first trimester, while screening for preeclampsia should still be performed for women with stage 1 hypertension as an independent moderate risk factor, and finally to optimize the screening strategy for preeclampsia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Based on first-trimester BP measurements, pregnant women were reclassified as normotensive (systolic BP \< 120mmHg and diastolic BP \<80mmHg on at least two occasions) and stage 1 hypertensive (systolic BP 130-139 mmHg and/or diastolic BP 80-89 mmHg on at least two occasions, without a diagnosis of chronic hypertension and/or elevated BP). At the same time, based on the 2019 FIGO pre-eclampsia screening guidelines, it is recommended that all pregnant women should be screened for pre-eclampsia in the first trimester. In this study, pregnant women who combined maternal factors, MAP and PLGF were analyzed by the "Bayesian rule" developed by the British Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF). Its online computing website: https://fetalmedicine.org/research/assess/preeclampsia/first-trimester. The individual risk of preterm PE was calculated at 11-14+1 weeks of gestation using the British Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) algorithm. Previous risk was calculated based on maternal demographic characteristics and obstetric history. Therefore, 1/100 was selected as the cut-off value, ≥1/100 was registered as high risk of preeclampsia, \< 1/100 was registered as low risk of preeclampsia. For people with high risk of preeclampsia (≥1/100) evaluated in the first trimester, low-dose aspirin prevention for preeclampsia is recommended between 12 and 28 weeks of gestation (preferably before 16 weeks). And continued until 36 weeks. To compare the pregnancy outcomes of women with normal blood pressure in the first trimester and stage 1 hypertension in different risk groups, and to find out whether screening for preeclampsia can be omitted for women with normal blood pressure in the first trimester, while screening for preeclampsia should still be performed for women with stage 1 hypertension as an independent moderate risk factor, and finally to optimize the screening strategy for preeclampsia.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

stage1 Hypertension Preeclampsia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Main study objective Groups: normotensive group

Main study objective Groups: normotensive group

blood pressure

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Based on first-trimester BP measurements, pregnant women were reclassified as normotensive (systolic BP \< 120mmHg and diastolic BP \<80mmHg on at least two occasions) and stage 1 hypertensive (systolic BP 130-139 mmHg and/or diastolic BP 80-89 mmHg on at least two occasions, without a diagnosis of chronic hypertension and/or elevated BP).

Main study objective Groups: Stage 1 hypertension group

Main study objective Groups: Stage 1 hypertension group

blood pressure

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Based on first-trimester BP measurements, pregnant women were reclassified as normotensive (systolic BP \< 120mmHg and diastolic BP \<80mmHg on at least two occasions) and stage 1 hypertensive (systolic BP 130-139 mmHg and/or diastolic BP 80-89 mmHg on at least two occasions, without a diagnosis of chronic hypertension and/or elevated BP).

Secondary objective grouping: Stage 1 hypertension low-risk group

Secondary objective grouping: Stage 1 hypertension low-risk group

blood pressure

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Based on first-trimester BP measurements, pregnant women were reclassified as normotensive (systolic BP \< 120mmHg and diastolic BP \<80mmHg on at least two occasions) and stage 1 hypertensive (systolic BP 130-139 mmHg and/or diastolic BP 80-89 mmHg on at least two occasions, without a diagnosis of chronic hypertension and/or elevated BP).

Clinical protocols for preeclampsia risk screening

Intervention Type OTHER

In this study, the risk factors of preeclampsia in pregnant women with combined maternal factors, MAP and PLGF were comprehensively analyzed by the "Bayesian rule" developed by the British Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF). The online calculation website is: https://fetalmedicine.org/research/assess/preeclampsia/first-trimester.

Secondary objective grouping: Stage 1 hypertension high-risk group

Secondary objective grouping: Stage 1 hypertension high-risk group

blood pressure

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Based on first-trimester BP measurements, pregnant women were reclassified as normotensive (systolic BP \< 120mmHg and diastolic BP \<80mmHg on at least two occasions) and stage 1 hypertensive (systolic BP 130-139 mmHg and/or diastolic BP 80-89 mmHg on at least two occasions, without a diagnosis of chronic hypertension and/or elevated BP).

Clinical protocols for preeclampsia risk screening

Intervention Type OTHER

In this study, the risk factors of preeclampsia in pregnant women with combined maternal factors, MAP and PLGF were comprehensively analyzed by the "Bayesian rule" developed by the British Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF). The online calculation website is: https://fetalmedicine.org/research/assess/preeclampsia/first-trimester.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

blood pressure

Based on first-trimester BP measurements, pregnant women were reclassified as normotensive (systolic BP \< 120mmHg and diastolic BP \<80mmHg on at least two occasions) and stage 1 hypertensive (systolic BP 130-139 mmHg and/or diastolic BP 80-89 mmHg on at least two occasions, without a diagnosis of chronic hypertension and/or elevated BP).

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Clinical protocols for preeclampsia risk screening

In this study, the risk factors of preeclampsia in pregnant women with combined maternal factors, MAP and PLGF were comprehensively analyzed by the "Bayesian rule" developed by the British Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF). The online calculation website is: https://fetalmedicine.org/research/assess/preeclampsia/first-trimester.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age ≥18 years old;
2. single live fetus with normal NT at 11-14+1 weeks of gestation;
3. Blood pressure \< 140/90 mmHg before 14+1 week of gestation;
4. Plan to have prenatal examination and delivery in our hospital;
5. Sign informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

Underlying diseases (chronic hypertension, type 1 or type 2 diabetes, kidney disease, autoimmune disease).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

FANG HE

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

FANG HE

Chief Physician/Professor of the Obstetrics Department

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Fang He, M.D

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

FANG HE

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Fang He, M.D

Role: CONTACT

+86 13724831279

Yafei Wang, Master

Role: CONTACT

+86 18716442633

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Fang He, M.D

Role: primary

+86 13724831279

Yafei Wang, Master

Role: backup

+86 18716442633

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

[2024] Ethics Review NO.040

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.