The Project of Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia Screening and Prevention Center
NCT ID: NCT06383858
Last Updated: 2024-09-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
50000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-08-01
2028-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Therefore, early prediction of preeclampsia and targeted strengthening of high-risk pregnant women supervision, early intervention and diagnosis and treatment can greatly reduce the serious obstetric complications and perinatal maternal and fetal deaths caused by preeclampsia, which has significant social and clinical significance.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
China Obstetrics Alliance Cohort Study
NCT03038555
China Obstetrics Alliance Cohort Study
NCT03615560
Prediction of Preeclampsia by Comprehensive Markers.
NCT03665623
Pregnancy Outcomes in Normotensive VS stage1 Hypertension: a Prospective Observational Study
NCT06339749
Risk Prediction Model of Preeclampsia
NCT04794855
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Screening based on maternal factors
Pregnant women with low risk of pre-eclampsia assessment and no suspected pre-eclampsia symptoms in the later period are only followed up at delivery to register the outcome indicators. For pregnant women with high risk of preeclampsia evaluation, it is necessary to register the history of drug use (whether or not to use and the dosage), and follow up to register the outcome index at delivery.
Screening method
All pregnant women in the group were screened for pre-eclampsia risk according to the clinical risk factors listed in NICE Guidelines (2019).
Screening based on FMF model
Preeclampsia risk assessment should be carried out at 11-13+6 weeks and 20-36+6 weeks of pregnancy. For low-risk pregnant women (PlGF≥100pg/ml or sFlt-1 /PlGF \<38), it is suggested to closely monitor maternal blood pressure and conduct routine prenatal examination. The basic information of pregnant women, medical and obstetric history, physical examination information, ultrasonic examination data, serum markers (PlGF, sFlt-1) test results, pre-eclampsia risk assessment results, medication history and so on were registered in the study. For high-risk pregnant women (PlGF\<100pg/ml or sFlt-1/PlGF ≥ 38), we should pay close attention to the changes of maternal blood pressure and proteinuria. Dynamic monitoring of PlGF or sFlt-1/PlGF should be carried out when necessary, and baseline information should also be registered after joining the group.
Screening method
In the first trimester, pregnant women with routine MAP and PLGF (with UtA-PI detection conditions plus UtA-PI) were tested, and the risk of preeclampsia was evaluated based on Bayes rule combined with maternal factors. In the second and third trimester of pregnancy, routine determination of PLGF or sFlt-1/PLGF was used to evaluate the risk of preeclampsia.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Screening method
All pregnant women in the group were screened for pre-eclampsia risk according to the clinical risk factors listed in NICE Guidelines (2019).
Screening method
In the first trimester, pregnant women with routine MAP and PLGF (with UtA-PI detection conditions plus UtA-PI) were tested, and the risk of preeclampsia was evaluated based on Bayes rule combined with maternal factors. In the second and third trimester of pregnancy, routine determination of PLGF or sFlt-1/PLGF was used to evaluate the risk of preeclampsia.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 2\) Based on the authoritative guideline of Figo and the consensus of experts in China, pregnant women who routinely use maternal factor +MAP+PLGF±UtA-PI in the first trimester or PLGF or sFlt-1/PLGF in the second and third trimesters to assess the risk of preeclampsia.
* 3\) Meet any of the above conditions, join the group voluntarily, and sign the informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
* 2\) Those who regularly use aspirin before joining the group;
* 3\) There are obvious other abnormal signs, laboratory tests or other clinical d• iseases, which are judged by the researcher to be not suitable for participating in researchers;
* 4\) Unable to obtain follow-up and delivery information.
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dunjin Chen
Director of Guangzhou Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dunjin Chen, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
FANG HE
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
[2024] Ethics Review NO.114
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.