Maternal Serum Markers Predicting Preeclampsia At Early Gestations
NCT ID: NCT05131282
Last Updated: 2024-11-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
18000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-01-01
2024-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
We hypothesize that specific circulating protein markers may serve as reliable biomarkers for PE risk prediction. Our PE predictor is a standalone blood test designed for early gestation screening to identify pregnancies at risk. This test measures concentrations of four proteins between 11 weeks and 13 weeks+6 days of gestation.
Based on the levels of these analytes, the test generates a risk score to classify patients as either low or high risk for PE.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prediction of Preeclampsia by Comprehensive Markers.
NCT03665623
Predictive Value of Maternal Blood Protein Signatures in Preterm Birth
NCT06664554
Predicting Late-onset Preeclampsia at 10-14 Weeks of Pregnancy
NCT04075708
Prediction of Early Pre-eclampsia From Maternal Factors, Biophysical and Biochemical Markers at First Trimester
NCT02990767
Prediction of Preeclampsia (PE) at 11-13 Week
NCT03554681
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Preeclampsia (PE) is a severe medical condition that affects 2-4% of pregnant women globally and is characterized by high blood pressure along with organ damage, particularly to the liver and kidneys. It is one of the leading causes of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Early detection and preventative management of PE, including the use of low-dose aspirin, are essential for safeguarding the health of both the mother and the developing fetus. The British National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) use risk factor-based guidelines to identify women at high risk for PE. These guidelines treat each risk factor independently, leading to additive detection rates but low overall sensitivity. NICE guidelines detect only 40% of preterm PE and 35% of all PE cases with an 11% false positive rate, while ACOG detects just 5% of preterm and 2% of term PE. ACOG recommends low-dose aspirin only for women with a history of preeclampsia in multiple pregnancies or preterm delivery before 34 weeks, covering just 0.3% of all pregnancies, 5% of preterm PE, and 2% of term PE. The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) PE test is utilized in several studies for screening and assessing the risk of developing PE during the first trimester. This test measures biochemical markers, such as pregnancy associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) and placental growth factor (PlGF), in maternal blood to calculate individual risk scores. However, its limitations have highlighted the need for more effective and reliable alternatives. Performance varies across clinical sites, with sensitivity reported as low as 39-40%, and its positive predictive value (PPV) is relatively low, typically around 10-20%. This results in a significant number of false positives and negatives, which can lead to unnecessary anxiety for pregnant women and may result in missed diagnoses for those at risk. Furthermore, the FMF test requires specialized equipment and techniques, such as ultrasound for measuring the uterine artery pulsatility index (UAPI), making it less accessible in resource-limited settings and inaccuracy due to variance from different operators. These constraints limit its widespread use, underscoring the urgent need for improved blood tests to enhance prediction accuracy and reduce false results.
Clinical significance and potential impact of the test:
Advancements in medical research and technology are paving the way for more effective blood tests to improve pre-eclampsia care management. By integrating additional biomarkers and employing cutting-edge diagnostic tools such as genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, we aim to enhance the precision and reliability of preeclampsia predictions. Our current research showcases the use of four blood serum protein markers to assess the risk of pre-eclampsia in women during early gestation (11-13 weeks), well before clinical symptoms arise.
To further validate the prediction and diagnosis performance of the novel preeclampsia test, we will enroll patients and initiate a large, multi-center observational clinical trial, including four diverse Asia cohorts, to test whether this standalone solution could bypass the need for complex maternal assessments.
Objectives and primary hypothesis of the study:
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the predictive performance of the test for preterm preeclampsia (PE), specifically assessing its sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Additionally, the study aims to examine the test's predictive performance for overall PE, using the same performance metrics. We hypothesize that specific circulating protein markers may serve as reliable biomarkers for identifying pregnancies at risk for PE.
TRIAL DESIGN:
This trial is a multicenter observational study conducted in real-world clinical settings.
OUTCOMES:
The primary outcome is the diagnosis of PE during pregnancy, following the America College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG, 2019) criteria. This diagnosis will be based on a systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg, measured on multiple occasions after 20 weeks of gestation, alongside proteinuria (dipstick urinalysis ≥ 1+ or a protein/creatinine ratio ≥ 30 mg/mmol \[0.3 mg/mg\]) or other signs of maternal organ dysfunction. PE will be categorized by gestational age at delivery as early-onset (\<34 weeks), preterm (\<37 weeks), or term (≥37 weeks).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PE group
Women with a confirmative diagnosis of PE
Blood test of PE risk
A blood test is applied to women between 11weeks and 13 weeks+6 days of GA at the first visit to evaluate risk of developing PE
Normal pregnancy group
Normal pregnant women
Blood test of PE risk
A blood test is applied to women between 11weeks and 13 weeks+6 days of GA at the first visit to evaluate risk of developing PE
Blood test of Preterm PE risk
A blood test is applied to women between 11 weeks and 13 weeks+6 days of GA at the first visit to evaluate risk of developing Preterm PE
Preterm PE group
Women with a confirmative diagnosis of Preterm PE
Blood test of Preterm PE risk
A blood test is applied to women between 11 weeks and 13 weeks+6 days of GA at the first visit to evaluate risk of developing Preterm PE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Blood test of PE risk
A blood test is applied to women between 11weeks and 13 weeks+6 days of GA at the first visit to evaluate risk of developing PE
Blood test of Preterm PE risk
A blood test is applied to women between 11 weeks and 13 weeks+6 days of GA at the first visit to evaluate risk of developing Preterm PE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Gestational age between 11 weeks and 13 weeks+6 days of GA at the first visit, as confirmed by ultrasound.
3. Control group: Pregnancies with no risk factors for preterm delivery, preeclampsia, or fetal growth restriction, selected during routine prenatal care between 11 weeks and 13 weeks+6 days of GA.
4. Informed consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
6. Pregestational diabetes.
7. Chronic hypertension.
8. Systemic diseases (e.g., chronic kidney disease, autoimmune disorders).
9. Any maternal or fetal condition necessitating pregnancy termination.
10. Known major fetal anomalies or fetal demise.
11. Active vaginal bleeding.
12. Serious medical illnesses (e.g., renal insufficiency, congestive heart failure, chronic respiratory insufficiency).
13. Asthma requiring systemic corticosteroids.
14. Use of anti-platelet or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
15. Active hepatitis.
16. Lack of informed consent.
18 Years
40 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Shenzhen Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital
OTHER
Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
OTHER
Women's Hospital, of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
UNKNOWN
Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
OTHER
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
OTHER
Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital
OTHER
HBI Solutions Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jianmin Niu
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jianmin Niu, Master
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Shenzhen Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital
Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
the Eighth Affiliated Hospital
Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
Zhengzhou, Henan, China
Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital
Changsha, Hunan, China
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
Jinan, Shandong, China
Women's Hospital, of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PE_001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.