Syndesmotic Screw in Neutral Position Versus Maximum Ankle Dorsiflexion in Ankle Fractures; Comparative Study.

NCT ID: NCT06313177

Last Updated: 2024-03-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-03-10

Study Completion Date

2025-03-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Ankle fracture is one of the most common orthopedic injuries. Approximately, 20% of surgically treated ankle fractures are associated with syndesmotic instability.According to the mechanism of the injury the syndesmotic disruption should be considered in Danis-Weber C-type fractures. However, such injuries were also frequently seen in Danis-Weber B-type fractures. Failure to detect and repair syndesmotic injuries early may result in poor clinical outcomes and complications affecting ankle function, such as long-term residual pain, post traumatic arthritis, and ankle impingement syndromes. Therefore, aggressive treatment is important when facing syndesmotic instability .

The distal tibiofibular syndesmosis is important for stability of the ankle mortise and thus for weight transmission and walking. Syndesmotic injuries are most commonly associated with fibular fractures, but they can also occur in isolation or with damage to the lateral ankle ligament after traumatic supination. The need for syndesmotic fixation of the distal tibiofibular joint has been controversia. fracture does not correlate reliably with the extent of the interosseous membrane tears identified on MRI of ankle fractures, and thus estimation of the integrity of the interosseous membrane and subsequent need for trans-syndesmotic fixation cannot be based solely on the level of the fibular fracture. An intraoperative syndesmotic stress test can establish the presence or absence of syndesmotic instability, evaluating the integrity of the syndesmosis by grasping the stabilised fibula with a hook or clamp and pulling it laterally. If more than 3 or 4 mm of lateral displacement occurs, syndesmotic fixation is necessary.

Most authors recommend surgical placement of a trans-fixation screw after anatomical reduction of the syndesmosis if a disruption is diagnosed to avoid complications.The main aims of treatment for dislocation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis are to restore the original anatomy and normal function and to recreate the stability of the ankle joint. The syndesmosis is traditionally fixed with a metallic screw, which is a method that has been used for decades and demonstrates good to excellent outcomes.

Some surgeons prefer Fixation of syndesmosis with screw in maximum ankle dorsiflexion and others prefer fixation in neutral position of ankle.in this study we are going to compare between these two

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Syndesmotic Injuries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

group A

group(A) cases with ankle in neutral position during syndesmosis fixation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

syndesmosis fixation with screws

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

syndesmosis fixation with Syndesmotic screw in neutral position versus maximum ankle dorsiflexion in ankle fracture

group B

group(B) cases with ankle in dorsiflexion position during syndesmosis fixation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

syndesmosis fixation with screws

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

syndesmosis fixation with Syndesmotic screw in neutral position versus maximum ankle dorsiflexion in ankle fracture

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

syndesmosis fixation with screws

syndesmosis fixation with Syndesmotic screw in neutral position versus maximum ankle dorsiflexion in ankle fracture

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients with fracture Ankle type C and type B associated with syndesmotic injury

Exclusion Criteria

* pathologic fractures
* Maisonneuve fractures
* medical illness or mental disorders affecting the follow-up examination
* loss to follow-up
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sohag University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mahmoud Asaad Mahmoud

Resident-orthopedic department-sohag hospital university

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sohag university Hospital

Sohag, , Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

mahmoud asaad, resident

Role: CONTACT

01114377005

Elshazly s Mosa, professor

Role: CONTACT

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

van Zuuren WJ, Schepers T, Beumer A, Sierevelt I, van Noort A, van den Bekerom MPJ. Acute syndesmotic instability in ankle fractures: A review. Foot Ankle Surg. 2017 Sep;23(3):135-141. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 Apr 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28865579 (View on PubMed)

Cornu O, Manon J, Tribak K, Putineanu D. Traumatic injuries of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Feb;107(1S):102778. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.102778. Epub 2020 Dec 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33333279 (View on PubMed)

Corte-Real N, Caetano J. Ankle and syndesmosis instability: consensus and controversies. EFORT Open Rev. 2021 Jun 28;6(6):420-431. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210017. eCollection 2021 Jun.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34267932 (View on PubMed)

Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 1994 Jul;15(7):349-53. doi: 10.1177/107110079401500701.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7951968 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Soh-Med-24-03-03MS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Fixation of Medial Malleolar Fractures .
NCT07148375 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA