Ziptight or Tricortical Screw Fixation of Acute Tibiofibular Syndesmotic Injury

NCT ID: NCT02930486

Last Updated: 2019-11-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-31

Study Completion Date

2019-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Treatment of syndesmotic injury with Weber C fracture. A randomized study comparing ZipTight suture endobutton and one tricortical 3,5 mm syndesmotic screw.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Syndesmotic injuries are common and often associated with unstable ankle fractures. The most common treatment is with a syndesmotic screw through the fibula and tibia which is later removed, usually after 10-12 weeks. The ZipTight suture endobutton (Biomet) is used for the same indication. It does not need removal and thus avoids subsequent surgery. This trial will compare these two methods and see if they are equal.

patients 18-70 years presenting to one of the three hospitals with and acute syndesmotic injury are eligible for inclusion. 120 patients are randomized to two treatment groups. One group will be treated with a ZipTight suture endobutton fixation and the other receives a tricortical screw fixation. Neither suture endobutton or screw is routinely removed. Follow up intervals are at 6 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months with clinical and-points. Standardized CT scans are taken postoperatively and at 12 and 24 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ankle Fractures

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ZipTight

ZipTight suture endobutton

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ZipTight suture endobutton

Intervention Type DEVICE

Zimmer Biomet ZipTight suture endobutton

Syndesmotic screw

Tricortical 3.5 mm syndesmotic screw

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Tricortical 3.5 mm syndesmotic screw

Intervention Type DEVICE

Depuy Synthes 3.5 mm screw

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ZipTight suture endobutton

Zimmer Biomet ZipTight suture endobutton

Intervention Type DEVICE

Tricortical 3.5 mm syndesmotic screw

Depuy Synthes 3.5 mm screw

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 to 70 years
* Acute syndesmotic injury with Weber type C fracture

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior injury og the same ankle
* Severe injury of the same leg affecting rehabilitation
* Symptomatic osteoarthritis of same ankle
* open injury
* Decubital injury affecting surgical site
* Dementia or unable to sign informed consent
* neuropatic conditions affecting same leg
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Oslo University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ostfold Hospital Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Vestre Viken Hospital Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Baerum Hospital, Vestre Viken

Sandvika, Gjettum, Norway

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Raeder BW, Stake IK, Madsen JE, Frihagen F, Jacobsen SB, Andersen MR, Figved W. Randomized trial comparing suture button with single 3.5 mm syndesmotic screw for ankle syndesmosis injury: similar results at 2 years. Acta Orthop. 2020 Dec;91(6):770-775. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1818175. Epub 2020 Sep 10.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32907456 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Syndesmose2016

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.