Comparison of Gait in Syndesmosis Injuries Treated With Screw Fixation vs Suture Button

NCT ID: NCT04972578

Last Updated: 2026-01-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

21 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-10-01

Study Completion Date

2026-01-09

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Injuries to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis are common and occur in an estimated 25% of all rotational ankle fractures. Anatomic reduction of the syndesmosis has been associated with improved functional outcome as well as decreased rates of posttraumatic arthritis. Both screw fixation and suture fixation have become accepted standards of care for treatment of syndesmotic injuries. Recent literature would suggest trends favoring suture fixation over screw fixation with improved quality of syndesmotic reduction, postoperative range of motion, and improved maintenance of syndesmotic reduction. However, the evidence remains heterogeneous, and patient reported outcomes have failed to show a superiority of one method over the other. Additionally, there have been no studies that demonstrate objective gait outcomes comparing screw versus suture fixation for syndesmotic injuries.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This will be a prospective randomized study. Patients with isolated rotational ankle injuries with syndesmotic instability will be randomized to either screw fixation or suture fixation for treatment of their syndesmotic injury. Patients will be followed postoperatively for one year following surgery with documentation of both clinical outcomes and subjective patient reported outcomes. Additionally, postoperative gait patterns will be measured and compared between patients who had syndesmotic injuries treated with screw fixation versus suture fixation

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Disruption of Ankle Syndesmosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Screw Fixation

Traditional fixation method of placing one or two screws across the syndesmosis.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Suture Button vs Screw Fixation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Syndesmotic fixation utilizing suture button fixation versus Screw Fixation (placing one or two screws across the syndesmosis)

Suture Button

Suture button implants which use a suture and anchor to repair the syndesmosis

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Suture Button vs Screw Fixation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Syndesmotic fixation utilizing suture button fixation versus Screw Fixation (placing one or two screws across the syndesmosis)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Suture Button vs Screw Fixation

Syndesmotic fixation utilizing suture button fixation versus Screw Fixation (placing one or two screws across the syndesmosis)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 19 years of age and older
* Isolated rotational ankle injury
* Syndesmotic instability (determined either pre- or intra-operatively)
* Length-stable fibula fracture pattern

Exclusion Criteria

* Open fracture
* Length-unstable fracture pattern (including Maisonneuve fracture pattern)
* Syndesmotic stability (determined either pre- or intra-operatively)
* Lower extremity neuropathy
* History of prior trauma or surgery to injured ankle
* Non-ambulatory
* Use of ambulatory assistive device prior to injury
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Nebraska

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sarah M Putnam, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Nebraska

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nebraska Medicine, Bellevue Health Center

Bellevue, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Lauritzen Outpatient Center

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Village Point Outpatient Center

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0146-21-FB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Ankle Fracture Tourniquet Utilization
NCT06863688 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA