Early vs Delayed Weightbearing After Surgical Fixation of Unstable Ankle Fractures With Syndesmosis Disruption
NCT ID: NCT05587842
Last Updated: 2025-10-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-02-10
2027-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Early Weight Bearing for Unstable Ankle Fractures Undergoing Operative Stabilization
NCT02779244
Effects of Early Weight Bearing on Rehabilitation Outcomes in Patients With Traumatic Ankle and Tibial Plateau Fractures
NCT04028414
Ankle Fracture vs Ankle Fracture-Dislocation
NCT02198768
Early Weight Bearing for Ankle Fractures
NCT02736370
Full-Weightbearing Following Ankle Fractures Surgically Treated - The FAST-Mobility Trial
NCT05419154
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
With syndesmotic injury, the goal of management is to restore and maintain the normal tibiofibular relationship to allow healing of the ligamentous structures of the syndesmosis. If syndesmotic injury is not detected nor treated long term, residual displacement of the ankle mortise will lead to persistent pain and early arthritis. Although most indications for surgical intervention for syndesmotic injuries are clear, certain elements of the post-operative protocol remain controversial. There is still controversy regarding using screws vs suture buttons to fix the syndesmosis, with studies showing similar functional outcomes and post-operative complications. However, screws have a significantly lower initial implant cost but inconclusive results on long term cost-effectiveness. For surgeons who use screws, two screws are better than one and recent literature shows that there is no need to remove screws routinely unless symptomatic. A recent systematic review shows there is little difference in functional outcome scores between immobilization versus early motion of surgically treated ankle fractures with syndesmotic injury. However, postoperative care in respect to when to initiate weightbearing still remains controversial.
Conventional postoperative care in regards to when to allow weightbearing varies by surgeon. Some prefer to keep the patient non-weightbearing for 6-12 weeks +/- immediate to early ankle motion, after which the patient begins protected weight bearing in a short leg walking cast for 2 weeks, followed by use of a soft ankle brace for 4-8 weeks. Others allow only touch toe weightbearing immediately postoperatively and only advance to full weight bearing once the syndesmosis screws have been removed, usually at 6 to 12 weeks. There is still no well-done evaluation to guide post op weightbearing.
A recent metanalysis of outcomes of early (EWB) versus delayed (DWB) postoperative weightbearing in patients undergoing surgical fixation of ankle fractures included seven randomized control trials, one quasi randomized trial, one prospective cohort study with retrospective matches, and one retrospective matched cohort study reported 10-point improvement in OMA scores at 6 weeks post-operatively for patients in the EWB group compared to the DWB group (p=0.02). With regards to time off work, there was a trend towards reduction of 15 days in the EWB group (p=0.08). Complication rates were similar, with no difference in rates of nonunion, malunion, or wound complications. Another systematic review does suggest that EWB after surgically treated ankle fractures would be appropriate for patients with good bone stock, minimal commination, and anatomical reduction, and may facilitate quicker rehabilitation and early return to work. Results show no significant difference in overall complication rates, including hardware failure, malunion, or nonunion. However, EWB may increase risk of superficial wound infection, but the studies had no statistical comparison.
There have been few studies to show outcomes of early protected weightbearing in patients who underwent surgical screw fixation of the syndesmosis. A recent retrospective review with 42 patients shows that EWB on a fixed syndesmosis appears to be safe, with no measurable clinical or radiographic consequences regarding ankle joint function. Even with screw breakage and loosening, loss of reduction was seldom observed. Another retrospective review was conducted on 89 patients who underwent open reduction internal fixation with syndesmotic stabilization using syndesmotic screws. The results showed maintenance of fracture reduction on all patients at 12 months and a complication rate of 11.7%, which is similar to previous early weightbearing trials on ankle fractures without syndesmotic stabilization.
No study has prospectively compared a traditional post-operative non-weightbearing protocol allowing ankle range of motion to early post-operative weightbearing as tolerated allowing ankle range of motion for unstable ankle injuries after surgical fixation of the syndesmosis. We will exclude the most severe injuries, including tibial plafond fractures with articular impaction and high-grade open ankle fractures. Implications of this study will be far reaching. Safe, early weightbearing will not only facilitate rehabilitation but it has been shown that early weightbearing reduces the time to return to work thus decreasing cost to the healthcare system and society.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Non-weightbearing Group
At 0 weeks to 2 weeks post operation, subjects will be provided CAM (controlled ankle motion walking) boot and instructed to be non-weightbearing on the ankle, using crutches for assistance. During 2nd week, subject will visit clinic where staples/stitches will be removed, with instructions to continue non-weightbearing w/ crutches. Instructions for limited range of motion to be given, passive/active range of motion out of boot will be allowed. Between 2 to 6 weeks, the subject will continue with non-weightbearing and follow range of motion instructions. After 6 weeks, the subject will begin weightbearing as tolerated. Instructions for limited range of motion to be given, and be weaned from orthosis.
At each follow-up visit, as part of the subject's standard of care, a physical examination and radiographic assessments will be completed, and that data collected for research purposes. Subject will also be requested to complete outcome questionnaires during their participation.
Delayed Weightbearing management post operation (Traditional)
Subjects will be instructed to be non-weightbearing on their ankle until at least 6 weeks. After 6 weeks, the subject will be instructed to be weightbearing as tolerated.
Early weightbearing (as tolerated) Group
At 0 weeks to 2 weeks post operation, subjects will be provided CAM (controlled ankle motion walking) boot and instructed to be non-weightbearing on the ankle, using crutches for assistance. During 2nd week, subject will visit clinic where staples/stitches will be removed, with instructions to be weightbearing as tolerated. Instructions for limited range of motion to be given, passive/active range of motion out of boot will be allowed. Between 2 to 6 weeks, subject will continue with weightbearing as tolerated in orthosis, following range of motion instructions. After 6 weeks, the subject will continue with weightbearing as tolerated, and be weaned from orthosis.
At each follow-up visit, as part of the subject's standard of care, a physical examination and radiographic assessments will be completed, and that data collected for research purposes. Subject will also be requested to complete outcome questionnaires during their participation.
Early Weightbearing management post operation
Subjects will be instructed to be weightbearing, as tolerated, on their ankle starting at two weeks post operation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Early Weightbearing management post operation
Subjects will be instructed to be weightbearing, as tolerated, on their ankle starting at two weeks post operation.
Delayed Weightbearing management post operation (Traditional)
Subjects will be instructed to be non-weightbearing on their ankle until at least 6 weeks. After 6 weeks, the subject will be instructed to be weightbearing as tolerated.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Surgical fixation of syndesmosis and/or ankle within two weeks of injury
* Closed or low grade open (Gustilo-Anderson grade I \& II low-energy injuries without gross contamination) fractures
* Skeletally mature patients with closed physis
Exclusion Criteria
* Bilateral ankle fractures or concurrent other lower extremity injuries/major injuries that would affect recovery time
* Inability to co-operate with post-op protocol (advanced dementia, polytrauma patient, developmental delay, etc.)
* Non-ambulatory pre-injury
* Tibial plafond fractures including articular impaction requiring elevation
* Peripheral neuropathy
* BMI over 45
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Arizona
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michael McKee
Professor and Chairman, Department of Orthopedic Surgery
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Banner - University Medical Center, Phoenix campus
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2011244166
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.