Permissive Weight Bearing in Displaced Intra-articular Calcaneal Fractures
NCT ID: NCT05721378
Last Updated: 2024-10-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
115 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-07-01
2026-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Full-Weightbearing Following Ankle Fractures Surgically Treated - The FAST-Mobility Trial
NCT05419154
Effects of Early Weight Bearing on Rehabilitation Outcomes in Patients With Traumatic Ankle and Tibial Plateau Fractures
NCT04028414
A Study to Compare Two Different Managements After Ankle Surgery: Immediate and Delayed Weight-bearing.
NCT04429217
Early Weightbearing Versus Non-weightbearing After Operative Treatment of an Ankle Fracture
NCT02029170
Immediate Weight-Bearing Ankle Study
NCT03032653
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective: Evidence showing which rehabilitation protocol is best for both fracture healing and quality of life for patients with Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures (DIACFs) is mostly lacking. This study has the aim to answer the question whether surgically treated patients with DIACFs following the Permissive Weight Bearing protocol (PWB) have better functional outcomes compared to patients with Restricted Weight Bearing protocol after 12 weeks (RWB) measured with the American Orthopaedic Foot \& Ankle Society (AOFAS) Score. The study hypothesizes that patients with DIACFs following the PWB protocol will have a better quality of life (HR-QOL) compared to patients who followed the RWB protocol.
The hypothesis is that there will be lower costs without any radiographic differences for surgically treated (irrespective of technique used) patients with DIACFs following a PWB protocol comparing to the current AO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen) standard care: the RWB protocol.
Study design: Multi-center randomized controlled trial
Study population: Presence of surgically (extended lateral, sinus tarsi or percutaneous approach) fixed DIACFs classified as Sanders type II to IV, age 18-67 years (labor force). Patients must be able to understand and follow weight bearing instructions. Patients will only be included after written informed consent is obtained.
Groups (intervention and control): Patients with DIACFs will be randomly allocated to one of the rehabilitation protocols, either PWB or RWB.
Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary objective: functional outcome. Secondary outcomes: quality of life, differences in radiographic parameters, complications, cost effectiveness and differences in surgical techniques.
Nature and extent of the burden: The PWB protocol aims to restore weight bearing faster than RWB protocol in DIACFs. Early postoperative weight bearing poses the risk of increased complications, such as secondary displacement of the fracture or failure of fracture fixation. Previous analysis of this protocol in other lower extremity fractures has shown a safe complication rate, although data from prospective randomized trials in calcaneus fractures are lacking. Follow-up is standardized according to current trauma guidelines, namely at time points 2, 6, 12 weeks and 6 months. The radiation exposure will not be different from standard of care. Therefore, the burden for participants is considered minimal, with no significant health risks.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Permissive Weight Bearing group
Rehabilitation following the Permissive Weight Bearing (PWB) protocol
Permissive Weight Bearing group
The Permissive Weight Bearing (PWB) protocol allows earlier post-operative permissive weight bearing, where progression of weight bearing is guided by the subjective experience (for example: pain, weight bearing tolerance) of the patient and the clinical expertise of the treating physician and therapist. Patients allocated to the PWB protocol start weight bearing after wound healing is achieved (approximately two weeks after the operation). Consequently, patients are stimulated to bear as much weight as tolerated by pain and comfort. Treatment will take place according to the PROMETHEUS protocol (treatment- and evaluation protocol). The protocol contains a number of weight bearing milestones (e.g. walking with two crutches, walking with two canes, walking with one cane and walking without any walking aids). The treating physiotherapist or physician records the dates that these milestones are reached in the study database.
Restrictive Weight Bearing group
Rehabilitation following the Restrictive Weight Bearing (RWB) protocol
Restricted Weight Bearing group
The Restrictive Weight Bearing (RWB) protocol consists of 8 to 12 weeks of postoperative restricted weight (0-10%) bearing, following the current AO Guidelines (7). After 8 weeks of restricted weight bearing, the weight bearing will be increased with 25% per week for 4 weeks. Every time the patient and the treating physical therapist or physician have contact, the weight bearing advice given to the patient at that point in time is recorded (unloaded; partial weight bearing + clarification; full weight bearing). Also, any additional advice given to the patient is recorded.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Permissive Weight Bearing group
The Permissive Weight Bearing (PWB) protocol allows earlier post-operative permissive weight bearing, where progression of weight bearing is guided by the subjective experience (for example: pain, weight bearing tolerance) of the patient and the clinical expertise of the treating physician and therapist. Patients allocated to the PWB protocol start weight bearing after wound healing is achieved (approximately two weeks after the operation). Consequently, patients are stimulated to bear as much weight as tolerated by pain and comfort. Treatment will take place according to the PROMETHEUS protocol (treatment- and evaluation protocol). The protocol contains a number of weight bearing milestones (e.g. walking with two crutches, walking with two canes, walking with one cane and walking without any walking aids). The treating physiotherapist or physician records the dates that these milestones are reached in the study database.
Restricted Weight Bearing group
The Restrictive Weight Bearing (RWB) protocol consists of 8 to 12 weeks of postoperative restricted weight (0-10%) bearing, following the current AO Guidelines (7). After 8 weeks of restricted weight bearing, the weight bearing will be increased with 25% per week for 4 weeks. Every time the patient and the treating physical therapist or physician have contact, the weight bearing advice given to the patient at that point in time is recorded (unloaded; partial weight bearing + clarification; full weight bearing). Also, any additional advice given to the patient is recorded.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age between 18 and 67 years old (labor force)
* Being able to understand the questionnaires and measurement instructions
* Indication for open/closed reduction and internal fixation
* Written Informed Consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Open calcaneal fractures (excluding medial wound without compromising surgical approach)
* Bilateral fractures of the lower extremities
* Unable to comply to the PWB protocol due to pre-existing conditions of the arms and legs (e.g. unable to use crotches due to hemiparalysis)
* Severe non-fracture related comorbidity of the lower extremity
* Pre-existent immobility (loss of muscle function of one or both legs)
* Dependent in activities of daily living (e.g. due to dementia, Alzheimer, New York Heart Association class IV angina, heart failure or oxygen-dependent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease)
* Rheumatoid arthritis of the lower extremities
* Severe psychiatric comorbidities that lead to inability to comply with the treatment protocol
* Pathologic fractures (metastasis, secondary osteoporosis)
* Peripheral neuropathy and/or diabetes
* Alcohol- or drug abuse preventing adequate follow-up
* Primary indication for arthrodesis subtalar joint
* Two or more fractures of the upper and/or lower extremities
18 Years
67 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Maastricht University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Amsterdam University Medical Center
Amsterdam, , Netherlands
Rijnstate Hospital
Arnhem, , Netherlands
Amphia Hospital
Breda, , Netherlands
Catharina Hospital
Eindhoven, , Netherlands
Groene Hart Hospital
Gouda, , Netherlands
Maastricht University Medical Center +
Maastricht, , Netherlands
Radboud University Medical Center
Nijmegen, , Netherlands
Maasstad Hospital
Rotterdam, , Netherlands
Zuyderland Medical Center
Sittard, , Netherlands
Haaglanden Medical Center
The Hague, , Netherlands
Elisabeth-Twee Steden Hospital
Tilburg, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Tim Schepers
Role: primary
Albert Pull ter Gunne, MD
Role: primary
Niels Berende, MD
Role: primary
Alexander van der Veen, MD
Role: primary
Jan Siert Reinders, MD
Role: primary
Martijn Poeze, Prof.
Role: primary
Erik Hermans, MD
Role: primary
Kees van der Vlies, MD
Role: primary
Raoul van Vugt, MD
Role: primary
Jochem Hoogendoorn, MD
Role: primary
Hilco Theeuwes, MD
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Verstappen C, Driessen MLS, Kalmet PHS, Brandts L, Kimman M, Edwards M, Hermans E, Poeze M. Permissive weight bearing versus restrictive weight bearing in surgically treated trauma patients with displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (the PIONEER study): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2024 Nov 18;25(1):778. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08617-5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PIONEER
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.