Fixation of the Posterior Malleolus in Medium-sized Trimalleolar AO Weber-B Fractures.

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

84 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The optimal treatment of ankle fractures with involvement of the posterior malleolus remains a subject of debate. Despite a large amount of literature on the role of the posterior malleolus in a so-called trimalleolar fracture, there are no clear guidelines for its treatment. Its size is the leading indication whether fixation of the fragment is necessary or not. Most orthopedic surgeons consider a posterior malleolar fracture fragment larger than 25% to 33% an indication for fixation. Interestingly, after careful evaluation of the available literature, there does not seem to be hard evidence for these numbers. It is generally accepted that restoration of a normal anatomic mortise and normal tibiotalar contact area are key elements for a good functional outcome. Inadequate reduction of the posterior fragment may alter the tibiotalar contact area and the joint biomechanics with altered stresses in parts of the joint, leading to the development of osteoarthritis and worse functional outcome. Traditionally, reduction of these larger fragments is indirectly, followed by percutaneous screw fixation in anterior-posterior direction. Disadvantages are that it is hard to achieve an anatomical reduction, and that fixation of smaller fragments is very difficult. Recently, a direct exposure of the posterior tibia via a posterolateral approach in prone position, followed by open reduction and fixation with screws in posterior-anterior direction or antiglide plate is advocated by several authors. This approach allows perfect visualization of the fracture, articular anatomical reduction, and strong fixation. Another advantage is that even small posterior fragments can be addressed. Several case series are published, which describe minimal major wound complications, good functional outcomes, and minimal need for reoperation. Since 2 years, in our institution we perform an open, anatomical reduction and fixation of all medium-sized posterior fragments via this approach. Although not thoroughly investigated yet, it seems to lead to better clinical outcomes than described in the literature and our retrospective cohort study.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Fixation of the Posterior Malleolus in Trimalleolar AO Weber C Fractures.

NCT02599285

Trimalleolar Fracture AO Weber C Fractures Syndesmotic Stability +1 more

UNKNOWN

Non--operative Treatment of the Medial Malleolus in bi- and Trimalleolar Ankle Fractures

NCT01441817

Ankle Malleolus Fracture Bimalleolar Fracture of Medial Malleolus Fracture of Ankle

COMPLETED NA

Unimalleolar Versus Bimalleolar Fixation in Bi- or Trimalleolar Ankle Fracture

NCT01757951

Trauma

SUSPENDED NA

Weber B Ankle Fractures With Associated Posterior Malleolus Fracture

NCT05413707

Posterior Malleolus Fractures Ankle Fractures Syndesmotic Injuries +2 more

RECRUITING NA

Functional Orthosis Versus Cast Immobilization for Partially Unstable Weber B Ankle Fractures

NCT05412693

Ankle Fractures

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Trimalleolar Fracture Posterior Malleolus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Fixation

Patients with a medium-sized posterior fragment which will be treated by open reduction and internal fixation of all fractured malleoli.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Fixation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fixation of the posterior malleolus with lag-screws or platefixation (usually by Drittelrohr plate).

No fixation

Patients with a medium-sized posterior fragment which will be treated bij open reduction and internal fixation of lateral and medial malleolus alone. No fixation of the posterior malleolus take place.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

NO Fixation

Intervention Type OTHER

NO Fixation of the posterior malleolus.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fixation

Fixation of the posterior malleolus with lag-screws or platefixation (usually by Drittelrohr plate).

Intervention Type DEVICE

NO Fixation

NO Fixation of the posterior malleolus.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age between 18 and 70 years old
* First ankle fracture of the affected side.
* Trimalleolar AO-Weber B fracture with additional medium-sized posterior fragment (5-25% of involved articular surface, AO type 44-B3)

Exclusion Criteria

* severe traumatized patients
* Multiple fractures during visit emergency department
* Ankle fracture of the same ankle in the history
* Patients with pre-existent mobility problems
* Pre-existent disability
* Patients living in another region and follow-up will take place in another hospital.
* Inability to speak the dutch language.

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No