A Comparative Study Between Positional and Lag Screws for the Fixation of Medial Malleolar Fractures

NCT ID: NCT05573516

Last Updated: 2022-10-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

34 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-08-18

Study Completion Date

2022-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A clinical trial comparing the outcomes of fixation of medial malleolar fractures either by fully threaded uni-cortical 4mm positional screws vs 4mm lag screws.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Ankle fractures are one of the most common traumatic injuries an orthopedic surgeon encounters during their clinical practice, Hence looking into the best management of them and conducting extensive research to determine the best methods of their fixation would be justifiable. Malleolar fractures and in particular medial malleolar involve the articular surface of the ankle joint and hence a displacement beyond \> 2mm requires careful anatomical restoration through open reduction and internal fixation. The medial malleolus is characterized with it's porous cancellous bone, and hence a lack of a secure fixation method is a major issue and is responsible for post-operative complication and delayed healing. The AO recommends fixation of these fractures with 4mm partially threaded lag screws. Some studies have arisen that may challenge this AO philosophy and raise the question if this actually is the best choice of treatment for medial malleolar fractures. The problem with lag screws is that they have a higher chance of unravelling. and other studies have shown that constructs fixated with fully threaded screws provide higher stability and provides higher shear resistanceand a higher pull-out strength. The other alternative to using a partially threaded lag screw would be a fully threaded lag screw of virtually the same length however it would act as a positional screw and hence the fracture displacement must be perfectly reduced with bone reduction forceps before inserting the fully threaded screws to achieve their property as positional screws.

A study conducted by parker et al. comparing the use of partially threaded and positional(fully threaded) screws of the same length found that compression force was in favor of the fully threaded screws. This could be due to threads of the fully threaded screws obtaining purchase in the dense physeal scar area while in the partially threaded screw, the threads bypass this physeal scar. Despite all this evidence and the widespread of this fracture among the population, the number of studies comparing lag vs positional screws in medial malleolar fractures is scarce and to our knowledge as of the time of the submission of this study, only a single study was made by Sayyed-Hosseinian et al., was performed as a pilot study comparing both fixation methods, due to the relatively small sample size , it indicates that further clinical trials are necessary to reach a reliable conclusion. The conduction of a clinical trial with a proper sample size should be done to assess if lag screws are actually a superior method to be considered the main recommendation, as the AO suggests, to treat medial malleolar fractures or if alternatively, positional screws are better, as some biomechanical tests mentioned prior have shown. This study will compare both methods to decide the superior fixation method in terms of achieving a better and faster quality of life post-surgery and and the least risk for potential complication for medial malleolar fractures by obtaining the AOFAS, MOXFQ and OMAS scores and comparing complications in both study groups.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Medial Malleolus Fracture Ankle Fractures

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Fixation with 4mm lag screws

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Open reduction and internal fixation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

unicortical fully threaded 4mm screws will be used as positional screws after completely reducing the fracture

Fixation with 4mm fully-threaded positional screws

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Open reduction and internal fixation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

unicortical fully threaded 4mm screws will be used as positional screws after completely reducing the fracture

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Open reduction and internal fixation

unicortical fully threaded 4mm screws will be used as positional screws after completely reducing the fracture

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

•Displaced medial malleolar fractures (Herscovici type B and C) that can be fixed with screws.

Exclusion Criteria

* Open fractures,
* Age \<18 or \> 70,
* Pathological fractures,
* Patients with DM,
* Type A and D fractures according to the Herscovici system(As these fractures would require screws to be positioned horizontally),
* associated tibial plafond fractures
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kasr El Aini Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ahmed Omar Sabry

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kasr Al Ainy-Cairo University- Faculty of Medicine

Cairo, Manial, Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ahmed O Sabry, MBBS

Role: CONTACT

+201117632926

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ahmed O Sabry, MBBS

Role: primary

+201117632926

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AOS12345

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.