A Comparative Study Between Positional and Lag Screws for the Fixation of Medial Malleolar Fractures
NCT ID: NCT05573516
Last Updated: 2022-10-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
34 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-08-18
2022-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Percutaneous Cannulated Screws Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Displaced Isolated Medial Malleolar Fractures in Adults
NCT06883435
Comparison of Patients Who Underwent Open and Minimally Invasive Fixation in Lateral Malleolar Fractures
NCT06753656
Fixation of Medial Malleolar Fractures .
NCT07148375
Comminuted Fractures of the Midshaft of the Tibia; (Interlocking Nail +/- Blocking Screws or Locked Plating With Predicted Distribution of Locking Screws) Choice Based on Finite Element Analysis Correlated With Clinical Outcome and Union.
NCT04388462
Tension Band Wiring Versus Cannulated Screws in Fixation of Medial Malleolus in Ankle Fracture
NCT04301037
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A study conducted by parker et al. comparing the use of partially threaded and positional(fully threaded) screws of the same length found that compression force was in favor of the fully threaded screws. This could be due to threads of the fully threaded screws obtaining purchase in the dense physeal scar area while in the partially threaded screw, the threads bypass this physeal scar. Despite all this evidence and the widespread of this fracture among the population, the number of studies comparing lag vs positional screws in medial malleolar fractures is scarce and to our knowledge as of the time of the submission of this study, only a single study was made by Sayyed-Hosseinian et al., was performed as a pilot study comparing both fixation methods, due to the relatively small sample size , it indicates that further clinical trials are necessary to reach a reliable conclusion. The conduction of a clinical trial with a proper sample size should be done to assess if lag screws are actually a superior method to be considered the main recommendation, as the AO suggests, to treat medial malleolar fractures or if alternatively, positional screws are better, as some biomechanical tests mentioned prior have shown. This study will compare both methods to decide the superior fixation method in terms of achieving a better and faster quality of life post-surgery and and the least risk for potential complication for medial malleolar fractures by obtaining the AOFAS, MOXFQ and OMAS scores and comparing complications in both study groups.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Fixation with 4mm lag screws
Open reduction and internal fixation
unicortical fully threaded 4mm screws will be used as positional screws after completely reducing the fracture
Fixation with 4mm fully-threaded positional screws
Open reduction and internal fixation
unicortical fully threaded 4mm screws will be used as positional screws after completely reducing the fracture
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Open reduction and internal fixation
unicortical fully threaded 4mm screws will be used as positional screws after completely reducing the fracture
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Age \<18 or \> 70,
* Pathological fractures,
* Patients with DM,
* Type A and D fractures according to the Herscovici system(As these fractures would require screws to be positioned horizontally),
* associated tibial plafond fractures
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kasr El Aini Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ahmed Omar Sabry
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kasr Al Ainy-Cairo University- Faculty of Medicine
Cairo, Manial, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AOS12345
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.