Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
64 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-01-01
2018-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Femoral Neck Locking Plate Vs Multiple Cannulated Cancellous Screws in Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in Young Adults: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Study
NCT06162637
Comparison of Dynamic Versus Static Lag Screw Modes for Cephalomedullary Nails Used to Fix Intertrochanteric Fragility Fractures
NCT04441723
Medial Enhancement Technique for the Treatment of Old Femoral Neck Fractures
NCT06713031
Direct Anterior Approach Versus Mini Posterior Approach Versous Lateral Approach for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures
NCT04618549
Feasibility of Implantation of Cemented Femoral Stem for Osteoporotic Femoral Neck Fracture in Elderly Patients
NCT02901938
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients were randomly allocated to a study group by permuted blocks of randomly mixed sizes and stratification according to the type of surgery (CMN or SHS). Randomization was applied using pre-prepared randomization cards, which were placed in opaque sealed envelopes and given to the surgeons to open just prior to surgery, and the designated procedure was then performed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
cephalomedullary nail
Cephalomedullary nails was inserted and fixed to the femoral head. In this study, all patients were treated with short nails (Profin®, TST).
cephalomedullary nail
For patients in the cephalomedullary nail group, an incision was made in the gluteal area from the tip of the greater trochanter in proximal orientation. A guidewire was placed into the medullary canal from slightly medial to the exact tip of the greater trochanter. The entry point of the greater trochanter and proximal medullary canal were reamed. The cephalomedullary nail was then inserted and fixed to the femoral head with a double screw. The cephalomedullary nail was then locked distally using a guide arm. These cephalomedullary nails were not locked proximally to maintain dynamization and to allow compression across the basicervical fracture line.
sliding hip screw
For patients in the sliding hip screw group, a lateral incision was made over the lateral proximal aspect of the femur. Under fluoroscopic guidance, the lag screw was placed centrally in the femoral head over the guidewire. A side plate with three holes was then attached to the hip screw.
sliding hip screw
Sliding hip screws was inserted and fixed to the femoral head. In this study, all patients were treated with a side plate with three holes (DHS plate, TST).
cephalomedullary nail
For patients in the cephalomedullary nail group, an incision was made in the gluteal area from the tip of the greater trochanter in proximal orientation. A guidewire was placed into the medullary canal from slightly medial to the exact tip of the greater trochanter. The entry point of the greater trochanter and proximal medullary canal were reamed. The cephalomedullary nail was then inserted and fixed to the femoral head with a double screw. The cephalomedullary nail was then locked distally using a guide arm. These cephalomedullary nails were not locked proximally to maintain dynamization and to allow compression across the basicervical fracture line.
sliding hip screw
For patients in the sliding hip screw group, a lateral incision was made over the lateral proximal aspect of the femur. Under fluoroscopic guidance, the lag screw was placed centrally in the femoral head over the guidewire. A side plate with three holes was then attached to the hip screw.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
cephalomedullary nail
For patients in the cephalomedullary nail group, an incision was made in the gluteal area from the tip of the greater trochanter in proximal orientation. A guidewire was placed into the medullary canal from slightly medial to the exact tip of the greater trochanter. The entry point of the greater trochanter and proximal medullary canal were reamed. The cephalomedullary nail was then inserted and fixed to the femoral head with a double screw. The cephalomedullary nail was then locked distally using a guide arm. These cephalomedullary nails were not locked proximally to maintain dynamization and to allow compression across the basicervical fracture line.
sliding hip screw
For patients in the sliding hip screw group, a lateral incision was made over the lateral proximal aspect of the femur. Under fluoroscopic guidance, the lag screw was placed centrally in the femoral head over the guidewire. A side plate with three holes was then attached to the hip screw.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* age of ≥65 year,
* an isolated fracture,
* the ability to walk independently (with or without an aid) prior to fracture,
* a fracture that had occurred less than one week prior to admission.
Exclusion Criteria
* a fracture due to malignancy,
* limited life expectancy due to medical comorbidities,
* any contraindication to surgery,
* diagnosed dementia,
* any other traumatic fracture on admission.
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Huseyin Bilgehan Cevik
Orthopaedic surgeon
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2015/514/74/7
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.