Two-stage ORIF Vs Ex. Fix. in Complex Pilon Fractures

NCT ID: NCT05141227

Last Updated: 2024-04-09

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 60 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2021-12-01
• Study Completion Date: 2024-02-01

Brief Summary

This study aims to compare the clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes of two-stage open reduction and internal fixation with single-stage external fixation in the treatment of comminuted tibial pilon fractures.

Detailed Description

A pilon fracture ( also known as tibial plafond fractures) is a fracture of the distal end of the tibia with comminution, intra-articular extension and significant soft tissue injury.Pilon injury accounts for about 5% to 10% of all tibial fractures, and for <10% of lower extremity injuries. The incidence rate is relatively low. However, with the high incidence of high energy trauma and accidental falls, the number of comminuted fractures has increased in recent years.Among all pilon fractures, about 30% are complex pilon fractures (AO/ OTA 43C type) caused by high-energy injuries.

Most complex pilon fractures are associated with severe soft tissue injuries, making the treatment challenging. Optimal treatment of comminuted pilon fractures requires precise anatomical reduction accompanied by early functional exercise. Several methods have been advocated to manage complex pilon fractures, but an optimal fixation technique remains controversial.

In 1979, Ruedi and Allgower first reported satisfactory results with primary open reduction and internal fixation.However, many authors have noted significant complications when open reduction and internal fixation was applied to severe pilon fractures, including an infection rate as high as 55%, wound necrosis and skin sloughing. These complications arose from the internal fixation, leading many orthopaedic surgeons to choose external fixation as an alternative.

Although external fixation decreased wound necrosis and skin sloughing, high rates of pin site infection and malalignment with subsequent non-union occurred. Therefore, orthopaedic surgeons made great efforts to establish methods that provided good results and decreased postoperative complications.

With the accumulation of surgical experience and the development of surgical techniques, two-stage open reduction and internal fixation and limited internal fixation combined with external fixation were established, and these two methods are now widely advocated for the treatment of comminuted tibial pilon fractures.

Two-stage open reduction and internal fixation involves closed reduction and external fixation followed by conversion to open reduction and internal fixation after the condition of the surrounding soft tissues has improved. This technique focuses on the soft tissue condition and potentially decreases the incidence of soft tissue complications.Thus, this method is widely considered the standard of care for high-energy pilon fractures.

However, other surgeons have recommended limited internal fixation combined with external fixation for these severe fractures as an alternative to open reduction and internal fixation to reduce the risk of postoperative complications.

The CT based four-column classification has been adopted by many surgeons as a guide for the treatment of comminuted pilon fractures.

The four-column classification can be summarized as lateral column (the distal fibula), posterior column (the posterior part of the intermalleolar line with the distal tibial shaft), anterior column (the anterior part of the intermalleolar line with the distal tibial shaft) and medial column (the medial one-third of the tibial plafond with the distal tibial shaft) Till now, there's no randomized prospective controlled trials confirmed which method either two-stage open reduction and internal fixation or single-stage external fixation is superior regarding clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes.

Conditions

Pilon Fracture

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: NONE

Study Groups

two stage ORIF

Two-stage Open reduction and internal fixation

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Two-stage Open reduction and internal fixation ( ORIF) using plates & screws

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Two stage ORIF using initially temporary spanning fixator then conversion to plates \& screws

single stage Ex. Fix

Single-stage external fixation with minimal internal fixation if needed

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

single-stage external fixation (EX.FIX.) with minimal internal fixation using cannulated screws if needed

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Single stage Ex.Fix. Using illizarov \& minimal fixation of the articular surface using cannulated screws through mini open approaches

Interventions

Two-stage Open reduction and internal fixation ( ORIF) using plates & screws

Two stage ORIF using initially temporary spanning fixator then conversion to plates \& screws

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

single-stage external fixation (EX.FIX.) with minimal internal fixation using cannulated screws if needed

Single stage Ex.Fix. Using illizarov \& minimal fixation of the articular surface using cannulated screws through mini open approaches

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Skeletally mature patients
• Both males and females
• Closed or open (grade 1&2) pilon fractures according to Gustilo and Anderson classification
• AO/OTA type C fractures
• Compromised soft tissue not allowing for primary open reduction and internal fixation
• Unilateral or bilateral
• Isolated or polytrauma patients

Exclusion Criteria

• Skeletally immature patients
• Open grade 3 pilon fractures
• Patients eligible for primary open reduction and internal fixation
• Ipsilateral lower limb fractures
• Pathological fractures
• Pre-existing symptomatic ankle arthritis

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Sponsors

Ain Shams University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Mohamed Osama Mohamed Eissa

principal investigator

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Salah Abou-Seif, Professor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Faculty of medicine, Ain Shams University

Locations

El-Demerdash hospital Ain shams university

Cairo, , Egypt

Countries

Egypt

References

Mauffrey C, Vasario G, Battiston B, Lewis C, Beazley J, Seligson D. Tibial pilon fractures: a review of incidence, diagnosis, treatment, and complications. Acta Orthop Belg. 2011 Aug;77(4):432-40.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 21954749 (View on PubMed)

Ruedi TP, Allgower M. The operative treatment of intra-articular fractures of the lower end of the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979 Jan-Feb;(138):105-10.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 376196 (View on PubMed)

Michelson J, Moskovitz P, Labropoulos P. The nomenclature for intra-articular vertical impact fractures of the tibial plafond: pilon versus pylon. Foot Ankle Int. 2004 Mar;25(3):149-50. doi: 10.1177/107110070402500307.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 15006336 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Complex pilon fractures

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id