Percutaneous Autologous Bone-marrow Grafting for Open Tibial Shaft Fracture

NCT ID: NCT00512434

Last Updated: 2018-10-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

85 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-09-30

Study Completion Date

2013-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The treatment of open tibial shaft fracture is often complicated by delayed union or non-union. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of autologous concentrated bone-marrow to accelerate healing of open tibial shaft fractures and to reduce the need for secondary intervention.

In a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study, 186 patients with an open tibial will be randomized to receive either the standard of care (fixation by nail or external fixator and routine soft-tissue management), or the standard of care with percutaneous injection, one month after fracture, of autologous concentrated bone-marrow. Randomization will be stratified by severity of the open wound. The primary outcome measure will be the proportion of patients requiring secondary intervention because of delayed union or nonunion within twelve months post-fracture.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study will be conducted at 13 University Hospitals in France. The protocol has been approved by the institutional review board. After written informed consent, patients will be randomized, in the days after the fracture in 2 groups of 93 patients : 1) the control group (standard of care only: fixation by nail or external fixator and routine soft-tissue management) and 2) the study group (standard of care with percutaneous injection, one month after fracture, of autologous concentrated bone-marrow). Randomization will be stratified by severity of the open wound and by center. For the wound, strata A comprise Gustilo-Anderson types I, II and III-A and strata B, type III-B.

For the study group, the injection is scheduled at 1 month ± 5 days after the fracture. The techniques have been described by Hernigou (J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006; 88(sup 1 part 2): 322-327). There are 3 steps: marrow aspiration (300 - 500 g) from iliac crest under general anesthesia, centrifugation in cell therapy unit to obtain a concentrated buffy coat of about 50 ml containing progenitor cells and other mononuclear cells, percutaneous injection in the fracture site of 20-30 ml of the buffy coat under fluoroscopy control.

Apart from the injection, the standard of care is the same for the 2 groups. Patients will be followed for 12 months, with assessments at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.

All analysis will be based on the intent to treat the population. The primary outcome measure will be the proportion of patients requiring secondary intervention because of delayed union or nonunion within twelve months post fracture. An independent panel of surgeons will evaluate all secondary procedure with the potential of promoting fracture-healing.

An independent evaluation of fracture union will be conducted by a radiology panel blinded to treatment allocation and all other patient data.

An outcome will be considered to be successful when the fracture heal, according to the investigator, without secondary intervention and is radiographically united during patient follow-up.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tibial Fractures Fractures, Open

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control in arm fields

Standard treatment Intervention no'Osteosynthesis'

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Osteosynthesis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Nail or external fixator Intervention 'Osteosynthesis'

IMOCA

Intervention 'Osteosynthesis' Percutaneous autologous bone-marrow grafting - surgical technique (ref: Hernigou Ph et al J Bone Joint Surg Am ,2006; 88 (sup 1 part 2): 322-327

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Osteosynthesis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Nail or external fixator Intervention 'Osteosynthesis'

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Osteosynthesis

Nail or external fixator Intervention 'Osteosynthesis'

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 17 years or more
* Open tibial shaft fracture with Gustilo-Anderson type I, II, III A or B
* Written informed consent
* Affiliated to French Social Security

Exclusion Criteria

* Circumferential bone loss
* Vascular or nerve injury
* Injury, other than tibial fracture, interfering with weight bearing
* Infection (skin, soft-tissue or bone)
* Disease or treatment interfering with bone union: head injury with coma, pathologic fracture
* Medical history on iliac wing contraindicating bone-marrow aspiration
* Corticoid or immunosuppressive therapy more than one week
* Pregnancy at the day of inclusion in study
* History of positive serology for HIV1+2, HBs, HCV
* Adult in the care of a guardian
* Impossibility to meet at the appointments for the follow-up
Minimum Eligible Age

17 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Tours

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Philippe Rosset, Pr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Service d'orthopédie II - CHRU de Tours

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UH Angers

Angers, , France

Site Status

UH Besançon Jean Minjoz

Besançon, , France

Site Status

UH Brest Cavale Blanche

Brest, , France

Site Status

UH Clermont Ferrand Gabriel Montpied

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

UH Grenoble Michallon Hospital

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

UH Grenoble South Hospital

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

UH Nancy Central Hospital

Nancy, , France

Site Status

UH Nantes Hôtel Dieu

Nantes, , France

Site Status

UH Pitié Salpétrière AH HP

Paris, , France

Site Status

UH Tours CHRU Trousseau

Tours, , France

Site Status

UHTOURS

Tours, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ID RCB 2007 - A00032 - 51

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

PHRN/06/PR/IMOCA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Surgery of the Pilon Fractures
NCT03367169 TERMINATED NA