Fixation of the Posterior Malleolus in Trimalleolar AO Weber C Fractures.

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

54 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In AO Weber type C fractures, there is a combination of a proximal fibular fracture, a medial fracture or ruptured deltoid ligament, and a syndesmotic injury. Anatomical repair and reduction of the syndesmosis is essential to prevent diastasis in the ankle-joint. Widening and chronical instability of the syndesmosis is related to worse functional outcome and development of posttraumatic osteoarthritis in the ankle. There is limited biomechanical and clinical evidence that syndesmotic stability in AO Weber type C fractures with an additional posterior malleolar fracture can also be reached by fixation of the posterior malleolar fragment. Maybe, this is even superior to the usual treatment with syndesmotic positioning screws. Some authors concluded that stability of the syndesmosis in these fractures can be much more achieved by fixation of the posterior malleolar fragment than by placement of syndesmotic positioning screws alone. Another additional benefit of open reduction and fixation of the posterior malleolar fragment is that this will lead to an anatomical reconstruction of the syndesmosis. Although there is no current evidence, it is likely that a malreduction of the fibula in the tibial incisura will lead to a worse functional outcome on the long-term. No clear consensus in the literature is found as to which fragment size of the posterior malleolus should be internally fixed. The general opinion is that displaced fragments that involve more than 25% of the distal articular tibia should be fixed. Traditionally, reduction of these larger fragments is indirectly, followed by percutaneous screw fixation in anterior-posterior direction. Disadvantages are that it is hard to achieve an anatomical reduction, and that percutaneous fixation of smaller fragments is very difficult. Recently, a direct exposure of the posterior tibia via a posterolateral approach in prone position, followed by open reduction and fixation with screws in posterior-anterior direction or antiglide plate is advocated by several authors. This approach allows perfect visualization of the fracture, articular anatomical reduction, and strong fixation. Another advantage is that even small posterior fragments can be addressed. Several case series are published, which describe minimal major wound complications, good functional outcomes, and minimal need for reoperation.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Fixation of the Posterior Malleolus in Medium-sized Trimalleolar AO Weber-B Fractures.

NCT02596529

Trimalleolar Fracture Posterior Malleolus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation

UNKNOWN NA

Routine Versus on Demand Removal of the Syndesmotic Screw

NCT02896998

Anke Fracture Syndesmotic Injury

COMPLETED NA

Ziptight or Tricortical Screw Fixation of Acute Tibiofibular Syndesmotic Injury

NCT02930486

Ankle Fractures

COMPLETED NA

Screw Versus Tightrope Syndesmotic Injury Fixation in Weber C Ankle Fractures

NCT01742650

Trauma

COMPLETED NA

Operative Versus Non Operative Management Outcomes of Isolated Lateral Malleolar Weber B Ankle Fractures

NCT03625154

Ankle Fractures

UNKNOWN NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Trimalleolar Fracture AO Weber C Fractures Syndesmotic Stability Open Reduction and Internal Fixation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Fixation

Patients with a trimalleolar AO Weber C fracture with open reduction and fixation of the posterior malleolar fragment.

Fixation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fixation of the posterior malleolus with lag-screws or plate-fixation. If syndesmosis is intra-operatively stable, no syndesmotic positioning screws will be placed.

No Fixation

Patients with a trimalleolar AO Weber C fracture without open reduction and fixation of the posterior malleolar fragment.

NO Fixation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Posterior malleolus will not be fixated. Syndesmotic positioning screws will be placed.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fixation

Fixation of the posterior malleolus with lag-screws or plate-fixation. If syndesmosis is intra-operatively stable, no syndesmotic positioning screws will be placed.

Intervention Type DEVICE

NO Fixation

Posterior malleolus will not be fixated. Syndesmotic positioning screws will be placed.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age between 18 and 70 years
2. First ankle fracture of the affected side
3. Isolated, fibular fracture proximal to the syndesmosis with a posterior malleolar fragment between 5 and 25% of the involved articular surface(AO type 44-C1, 44-C2, 44-C3).

Exclusion Criteria

1. Multiple injuries
2. Ankle fracture of the same ankle in the history
3. Patients with pre-existent mobility problems
4. Pre-existent disability like wheelchair or walking aid dependency.
5. Patients living in another region of whom follow-up will take place in another hospital
6. Insufficient understanding of the Dutch language

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No