Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-04-10
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Weight Bearing After Pelvis and Acetabulum Fracture Fixation
NCT07189156
Effects of Early Weight Bearing on Rehabilitation Outcomes in Patients With Traumatic Ankle and Tibial Plateau Fractures
NCT04028414
Early Weight Bearing on Supracondylar Distal Femur Fractures in Elderly Patients
NCT02475941
Full-Weightbearing Following Ankle Fractures Surgically Treated - The FAST-Mobility Trial
NCT05419154
A Study to Compare Two Different Managements After Ankle Surgery: Immediate and Delayed Weight-bearing.
NCT04429217
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigator hypothesizes that in a feasibility trial of immediate versus delayed WBAT following lower extremity, pelvis, and acetabulum fracture fixation, this trial will:
1. be able to enroll 50% of eligible patients and have a 90% follow-up at 90 days post-op of enrolled patients.
2. be able to achieve 90% correct documentation of postoperative weight bearing status and primary outcomes (reoperation or hardware failure).
Specific Aim 1 - Evaluate in a feasibility trial of immediate versus delayed WBAT following lower extremity, pelvis, and acetabulum fracture fixation whether 50% of patients can be enrolled, and 90% of those enrolled will have 90-day follow-up.
Specific Aim 2 - Evaluate in a feasibility trial of immediate versus delayed WBAT following lower extremity, pelvis, and acetabulum fracture fixation whether 90% correct documentation of postoperative weight bearing status and 90% correct documentation of primary outcomes (reoperation or hardware failure) can be obtained.
The investigator anticipates that the feasibility criteria will be met with regard to enrollment, follow-up, and documentation, which will allow us to begin a (likely multicenter) randomized controlled trial evaluating early versus delayed weight bearing following lower extremity, pelvis, and acetabulum fixation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Immediate WBAT
Recent studies have highlighted that early WBAT is may be safe following fixation of lower extremity, pelvis, and acetabulum fractures where the standard of care has been delayed WBAT, but high-quality prospective studies on this topic are needed.
Immediate WBAT
Men or women over 18 years who present with a fracture of the acetabulum, pelvis, distal femur, proximal tibia, distal tibia, who will undergo fracture fixation within 7 days of their injury and consent to the research study.
Delayed WBAT
Though immediate postoperative WBAT has become the standard of care following fixation of pertrochanteric, femoral shaft, and tibial shaft fractures, most surgeons restrict patient weight bearing following fixation of other lower extremity and pelvis/acetabulum fractures. Progression to full weight bearing varies greatly by type of fracture, fixation method, and surgeon. Weight bearing restrictions following fracture fixation have been shown to be associated with various poor outcomes (increased complications, prolonged hospital length of stay, etc.), particularly in geriatric patients. Thus, it is important for us to understand if it is safe to allow early weight bearing following lower extremity and pelvis/acetabulum fracture fixation, as this could help expedite patient mobility and return to function, and potentially reduce complications.
No Intervention: Delayed WBAT
Patients with ankle fractures will be instructed to touch-down (toe touch or foot flat) weight bear (approximately 10% of body weight) while in the boot for. Patients will be instructed to keep foot off of floor or set ball of foot or heal on ground for balance using walker or crutches at all times. After the 6 week post op visit, patients may begin weight bearing as tolerated. Patients with tibial plateau fractures will be instructed to touch down (toe touch or foot flat) weight bear (approximately 10% of body weight) for at least 6 weeks. After the 6 week post op visit, patients may begin weight bearing as tolerated until full weight bearing is achieved.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Immediate WBAT
Men or women over 18 years who present with a fracture of the acetabulum, pelvis, distal femur, proximal tibia, distal tibia, who will undergo fracture fixation within 7 days of their injury and consent to the research study.
No Intervention: Delayed WBAT
Patients with ankle fractures will be instructed to touch-down (toe touch or foot flat) weight bear (approximately 10% of body weight) while in the boot for. Patients will be instructed to keep foot off of floor or set ball of foot or heal on ground for balance using walker or crutches at all times. After the 6 week post op visit, patients may begin weight bearing as tolerated. Patients with tibial plateau fractures will be instructed to touch down (toe touch or foot flat) weight bear (approximately 10% of body weight) for at least 6 weeks. After the 6 week post op visit, patients may begin weight bearing as tolerated until full weight bearing is achieved.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Operative treatment within 7 days of injury at R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland, University of Maryland Medical System, University of Maryland Capital Region Medical Center.
* Provision of informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Cognitive ability does not allow for full understanding of study procedures ( Patient has been diagnosed with psychiatric condition, intellectually challenged without adequate family support).
* Patient has other orthopaedic or non-orthopaedic injuries that would preclude him/her from being able to weight bear immediately (e.g. open fractures, polytrauma.
* Significant impaction (\>2mm) or comminution at joint surface (e.g. with acetabulum, distal femur, tibial plateau, or tibial plafond fractures).
* Patients who would not be able to immediately weight bear or comply with weight bearing restrictions.
* Not willing to be randomized.
* Surgeon or clinical follow will not occur at participating hospital or location.
* Anticipated problems with follow up in the judgement of study personnel ( patient is homeless).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Maryland, Baltimore
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Robert O'Toole
Program Director, Orthopaedic traumatology, Director of Clinical Research, Department of Orthopaedics
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Robert O'Toole, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Maryland, Shock Trauma Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
University of Maryland, Capital Region Health
Cheverly, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cunningham BP, Ali A, Parikh HR, Heare A, Blaschke B, Zaman S, Montalvo R, Reahl B, Rotuno G, Kark J, Bender M, Miller B, Basmajian H, McLemore R, Shearer DW, Obremskey W, Sagi C, O'Toole RV. Immediate weight bearing as tolerated (WBAT) correlates with a decreased length of stay post intramedullary fixation for subtrochanteric fractures: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021 Feb;31(2):235-243. doi: 10.1007/s00590-020-02759-3. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
Gaski GE, Manson TT, Castillo RC, Slobogean GP, O'Toole RV. Nonoperative treatment of intermediate severity lateral compression type 1 pelvic ring injuries with minimally displaced complete sacral fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Dec;28(12):674-80. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000130.
Gitajn IL, Connelly D, Mascarenhas D, Breazeale S, Berger P, Schoonover C, Martin B, O'Toole RV, Pensy R, Sciadini M. Is prescribed lower extremity weight-bearing status after geriatric lower extremity trauma associated with increased mortality? Injury. 2018 Feb;49(2):404-408. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.12.012. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
Marchand LS, Horton S, Mullike A, Goel R, Krum N, Ochenjele G, O'Hara N, O'Toole RV, Eglseder WA, Pensy R. Immediate Weight Bearing of Plated Both-Bone Forearm Fractures Using Eight Cortices Proximal and Distal to the Fracture in the Polytrauma Patient Is Safe. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021 Aug 1;29(15):666-672. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-01252.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HP-00103274
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.