Immediate Weightbearing vs Delayed Weightbearing

NCT ID: NCT05595148

Last Updated: 2025-05-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-04-10

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to perform a feasibility trial of immediate versus delayed weight bearing following fixation of fractures of the lower extremity, pelvis, and acetabulum. The investigator will enroll patients from Shock Trauma over a period of 12 months, and randomize them to immediate weight bearing as tolerated (WBAT) versus delayed WBAT (non-weightbearing for 6-12 weeks). Four specific feasibility criteria will be assessed: enrollment (target 50%), follow-up (target 90% at 3 months), correct documentation of weight bearing (target 90%), correct documentation of primary outcomes, which include reoperation and hardware failure (target 90%). Target enrollment is patients with fractures where the current standard of care is delayed WBAT; for lower extremity this will include fractures of the distal femur, proximal tibia, and distal tibia, including select fractures with intra-articular extension. If feasibility criteria are met over the course of this study, the investigator hopes to move forward with a multicenter randomized controlled trial on this topic.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Weight bearing restrictions are increasingly being scrutinized, as understanding of the potential negative effects of immobilization expand. Recent studies have highlighted that early WBAT may be safe following fixation of lower extremity, pelvis, and acetabulum fractures where the standard of care has been delayed WBAT, but high-quality prospective studies on this topic are needed.

The investigator hypothesizes that in a feasibility trial of immediate versus delayed WBAT following lower extremity, pelvis, and acetabulum fracture fixation, this trial will:

1. be able to enroll 50% of eligible patients and have a 90% follow-up at 90 days post-op of enrolled patients.
2. be able to achieve 90% correct documentation of postoperative weight bearing status and primary outcomes (reoperation or hardware failure).

Specific Aim 1 - Evaluate in a feasibility trial of immediate versus delayed WBAT following lower extremity, pelvis, and acetabulum fracture fixation whether 50% of patients can be enrolled, and 90% of those enrolled will have 90-day follow-up.

Specific Aim 2 - Evaluate in a feasibility trial of immediate versus delayed WBAT following lower extremity, pelvis, and acetabulum fracture fixation whether 90% correct documentation of postoperative weight bearing status and 90% correct documentation of primary outcomes (reoperation or hardware failure) can be obtained.

The investigator anticipates that the feasibility criteria will be met with regard to enrollment, follow-up, and documentation, which will allow us to begin a (likely multicenter) randomized controlled trial evaluating early versus delayed weight bearing following lower extremity, pelvis, and acetabulum fixation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rehabilitation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Immediate WBAT

Recent studies have highlighted that early WBAT is may be safe following fixation of lower extremity, pelvis, and acetabulum fractures where the standard of care has been delayed WBAT, but high-quality prospective studies on this topic are needed.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Immediate WBAT

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Men or women over 18 years who present with a fracture of the acetabulum, pelvis, distal femur, proximal tibia, distal tibia, who will undergo fracture fixation within 7 days of their injury and consent to the research study.

Delayed WBAT

Though immediate postoperative WBAT has become the standard of care following fixation of pertrochanteric, femoral shaft, and tibial shaft fractures, most surgeons restrict patient weight bearing following fixation of other lower extremity and pelvis/acetabulum fractures. Progression to full weight bearing varies greatly by type of fracture, fixation method, and surgeon. Weight bearing restrictions following fracture fixation have been shown to be associated with various poor outcomes (increased complications, prolonged hospital length of stay, etc.), particularly in geriatric patients. Thus, it is important for us to understand if it is safe to allow early weight bearing following lower extremity and pelvis/acetabulum fracture fixation, as this could help expedite patient mobility and return to function, and potentially reduce complications.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

No Intervention: Delayed WBAT

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients with ankle fractures will be instructed to touch-down (toe touch or foot flat) weight bear (approximately 10% of body weight) while in the boot for. Patients will be instructed to keep foot off of floor or set ball of foot or heal on ground for balance using walker or crutches at all times. After the 6 week post op visit, patients may begin weight bearing as tolerated. Patients with tibial plateau fractures will be instructed to touch down (toe touch or foot flat) weight bear (approximately 10% of body weight) for at least 6 weeks. After the 6 week post op visit, patients may begin weight bearing as tolerated until full weight bearing is achieved.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Immediate WBAT

Men or women over 18 years who present with a fracture of the acetabulum, pelvis, distal femur, proximal tibia, distal tibia, who will undergo fracture fixation within 7 days of their injury and consent to the research study.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

No Intervention: Delayed WBAT

Patients with ankle fractures will be instructed to touch-down (toe touch or foot flat) weight bear (approximately 10% of body weight) while in the boot for. Patients will be instructed to keep foot off of floor or set ball of foot or heal on ground for balance using walker or crutches at all times. After the 6 week post op visit, patients may begin weight bearing as tolerated. Patients with tibial plateau fractures will be instructed to touch down (toe touch or foot flat) weight bear (approximately 10% of body weight) for at least 6 weeks. After the 6 week post op visit, patients may begin weight bearing as tolerated until full weight bearing is achieved.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Fracture of the acetabulum, pelvis, distal femur, distal tibia, including those with intra- articular extension, that meets surgical indications.
* Operative treatment within 7 days of injury at R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland, University of Maryland Medical System, University of Maryland Capital Region Medical Center.
* Provision of informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Non English Speaking.
* Cognitive ability does not allow for full understanding of study procedures ( Patient has been diagnosed with psychiatric condition, intellectually challenged without adequate family support).
* Patient has other orthopaedic or non-orthopaedic injuries that would preclude him/her from being able to weight bear immediately (e.g. open fractures, polytrauma.
* Significant impaction (\>2mm) or comminution at joint surface (e.g. with acetabulum, distal femur, tibial plateau, or tibial plafond fractures).
* Patients who would not be able to immediately weight bear or comply with weight bearing restrictions.
* Not willing to be randomized.
* Surgeon or clinical follow will not occur at participating hospital or location.
* Anticipated problems with follow up in the judgement of study personnel ( patient is homeless).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Maryland, Baltimore

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Robert O'Toole

Program Director, Orthopaedic traumatology, Director of Clinical Research, Department of Orthopaedics

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Robert O'Toole, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Maryland, Baltimore

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Maryland, Shock Trauma Center

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

University of Maryland, Capital Region Health

Cheverly, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cunningham BP, Ali A, Parikh HR, Heare A, Blaschke B, Zaman S, Montalvo R, Reahl B, Rotuno G, Kark J, Bender M, Miller B, Basmajian H, McLemore R, Shearer DW, Obremskey W, Sagi C, O'Toole RV. Immediate weight bearing as tolerated (WBAT) correlates with a decreased length of stay post intramedullary fixation for subtrochanteric fractures: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021 Feb;31(2):235-243. doi: 10.1007/s00590-020-02759-3. Epub 2020 Aug 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32797351 (View on PubMed)

Gaski GE, Manson TT, Castillo RC, Slobogean GP, O'Toole RV. Nonoperative treatment of intermediate severity lateral compression type 1 pelvic ring injuries with minimally displaced complete sacral fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Dec;28(12):674-80. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000130.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24740110 (View on PubMed)

Gitajn IL, Connelly D, Mascarenhas D, Breazeale S, Berger P, Schoonover C, Martin B, O'Toole RV, Pensy R, Sciadini M. Is prescribed lower extremity weight-bearing status after geriatric lower extremity trauma associated with increased mortality? Injury. 2018 Feb;49(2):404-408. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.12.012. Epub 2017 Dec 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29249533 (View on PubMed)

Marchand LS, Horton S, Mullike A, Goel R, Krum N, Ochenjele G, O'Hara N, O'Toole RV, Eglseder WA, Pensy R. Immediate Weight Bearing of Plated Both-Bone Forearm Fractures Using Eight Cortices Proximal and Distal to the Fracture in the Polytrauma Patient Is Safe. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021 Aug 1;29(15):666-672. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-01252.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34030171 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HP-00103274

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Early Weight Bearing in Distal Femur Fractures
NCT06806839 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA