Accelerated Flap Coverage in Severe Lower Extremity Trauma
NCT ID: NCT06293469
Last Updated: 2025-10-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
356 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-11-04
2030-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Combined Randomised and Observational Study of Type B Ankle Fracture Treatment
NCT01134094
Routine Versus on Demand Removal of the Syndesmotic Screw
NCT02896998
Early vs Delayed Weightbearing After Surgical Fixation of Unstable Ankle Fractures With Syndesmosis Disruption
NCT05587842
Telerehabilitation Following Ankle Fractures
NCT04235907
Comparison of the Results of Complex Ankle Fractures Treated With and Without Ankle Arthroscopy
NCT02449096
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary objective of this trial is to determine if accelerated flap coverage (within 72 hours of injury) compared to standard flap coverage timing leads lower rates of infection and infection-related complications. The trial population includes patients 18 years and older with an acute open fracture and/or dislocation below the knee, with a diagnosed need for acute soft tissue coverage with a flap. Patients who undergo primary amputation prior to attempted flap coverage will be excluded. There will be 356 participants randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive either accelerated flap coverage (goal of flap within 72 hours from injury) or flap coverage at the time that reflects the standard of care at each institution. The timing of the trial interventions, other adjunctive treatments, the fracture fixation, and flap coverage procedures will be documented for both treatment groups. Management of the fracture or dislocation, selection of flap, and post-injury flap management will be at the discretion of the operating surgeons and documented for both treatment groups. Participants will have follow-up at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-randomization.
The primary outcome will be a composite outcome to evaluate clinical status 6 months after randomization. Components of the composite outcome will be hierarchically assessed in the following order: 1) all-cause mortality, 2) amputation related to injury, 3) re-operation for infection and/or flap complication (flap compromise, partial and/or complete flap failure), and 4) days in hospital, defined as days in an acute in-patient hospital (i.e., not rehab or nursing facility). The secondary outcomes will independently assess the individual components of the primary outcome at 6 and 12 months, the composite outcome at 12 months, and health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction over 6 and 12 months. An Adjudication Committee will review primary and secondary endpoints and a Data Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC) will review all safety events.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Accelerated Flap Coverage
Accelerated flap surgery timing at a goal of within 72 hours from injury. Management of the fracture or dislocation, selection of flap, and post-injury flap management will be at the discretion of the operating surgeons and documented for both treatment groups.
Accelerated Flap Coverage Surgery
Timing of the flap surgery is with a goal of 72 hours from injury
Standard of Care Flap Timing
The flap surgery will be performed at the standard of care timing for the institution. Management of the fracture or dislocation, selection of flap, and post-injury flap management will be at the discretion of the operating surgeons and documented for both treatment groups.
Standard of Care Flap Timing
Timing of the flap surgery is the standard of care flap timing for the participating institution.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Accelerated Flap Coverage Surgery
Timing of the flap surgery is with a goal of 72 hours from injury
Standard of Care Flap Timing
Timing of the flap surgery is the standard of care flap timing for the participating institution.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Severe lower extremity open fracture and/or dislocation below the knee requiring an acute flap for management of the musculoskeletal injury.
3. Will have all planned flap surgeries performed by a participating surgeon or delegate.
4. Able to be randomized within 48 hours of injury.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Primary amputation anticipated prior to attempted flap for management of the injury.
3. Critical limb ischemia that requires re-vascularization for limb perfusion.
4. Chronic or acute infection at or near the musculoskeletal injury site at the time of initial injury surgery.
5. Burns at the musculoskeletal injury site.
6. Incarceration.
7. Expected injury survival of less than 12 months.
8. Terminal illness with expected survival of less than 12 months.
9. Currently enrolled in a trial that does not permit co-enrollment.
10. Declined to provide informed consent.
11. Unable to obtain informed consent due to language barriers.
12. Unable to obtain informed consent because a legally authorized representative was unavailable.
13. Anticipated problems, in the judgment of research personnel, with maintaining follow-up with the patient.
14. Prior enrollment in the trial.
15. Eligible patient or LAR was not approached within screening window (missed participant).
16. Other reason to exclude the patient, as approved by the Principal Investigators.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
McMaster University
OTHER
University of Maryland, Baltimore
OTHER
Orthopaedic Trauma Association
OTHER
Foundation of Orthopedic Trauma
OTHER
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
NIH
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
OTHER_GOV
Johns Hopkins University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lily Mundy, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UC Davis Medical Center
Sacramento, California, United States
R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
John Hopkins Bayview Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
The Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
University of Maryland Capital Region Medical Center
Largo, Maryland, United States
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, United States
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
The Alfred Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Vall d'Hebron University Hospital
Barcelona, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Ara A Salibian, MD
Role: primary
Mark J Gage, MD
Role: primary
Lily R Mundy, MD
Role: primary
Lily R Mundy, MD
Role: primary
Todd Jaeblon, MD
Role: primary
Graham J DeKeyser, MD
Role: primary
Lauren M Tatman, MD
Role: primary
Lipi Shukla, MBBS, PhD
Role: primary
Jordi Tomás-Hernández, MD
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB00434587
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.